On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Tony Wright ton...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently trying to get ASP.Net working with ADAM (which is the
lightweight Active Directory for Applications) on a Windows XP SP3 machine.
I have configured ASP.Net membership and role providers in the
Hi Tony,
I'm not intent on winning any argument and I think you really
fundamentally misunderstand my position.
I have only suggested that people should accept a multitude of viewpoints
and not accept something being given to them them prima facie. Current
pro-AGW research is far from beyond
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote:
I wasn't trying to win an argument. My position remains flexible and
nuanced.
Mm, I think I need to add this as a disclaimer to the end of all of my emails.
--
David Connors (da...@codify.com)
Software Engineer
On 24 February 2010 08:56, Craig van Nieuwkerk crai...@gmail.com wrote:
really eye popping reading. Conspiracy to delete data, fudge data and
models, ensuring the deletion of mail at Hadley and uPen on impending
If you take 10 years of emails and correspondence between people in an
Greetings all,
Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one
question in an email? In fact, I'll generalise that and say people
often don't read an entire email. I had this today (already) but this
happens to me all the time (it's probably more like 25% of the time
but I think
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:41 AM, David Richards
ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com wrote:
Greetings all,
Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one
question in an email? In fact, I'll generalise that and say people
often don't read an entire email. I had this today (already)
It is funny you should say this. One of the guys i work with at a
partner company and I always say include only one fact per email. :)
I try to do that but when requirements get complicated it can get hard.
--
David Connors
Software Engineer
Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com
Phone: +61 (7)
My rule of thumb is if the email starts to get too complicated pick up the
good old phone :-)
On 26 February 2010 08:25, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote:
It is funny you should say this. One of the guys i work with at a
partner company and I always say include only one fact per email. :)
People don't read more than the first 2 lines of emails. For example I
stopped reading after I'll generalise :)
Regards
Arjang
On 26 February 2010 08:41, David Richards ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com wrote:
Greetings all,
Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one
The problem with using emails as requirements documents...
Q: Where are the requirements for the cruise control software?
A: I'll forward you the email trail of the discussions I had with Toyota.
a year or so goes by
Q: Don't you know the cruise control should disengage when you brake?
A: Sorry
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I remember a post on this forum about framework for ditributed stuff
( aka intresting stuff ).
Distributed how?
You mean Parallel Linq? And other such things? http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/
Or do you
You mean that's not the norm? :)
Requirements docs are like bigfoot. You are assured it exists but when
you see it, you are disappointed to find it is little more than just
do it. Plus its wearing a digital watch.
David
If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes
will fall like a
what are the Tools/Methodologies to categorise/Implement business
rules in .net?
In the book Wisdom of the Gurus in Business Rules chapter by James
J. Odell the fact that most of times business rules are actually by
product of how a system should behave has been mentioned.
My Question is how is
What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and
versioning built into the email client.
Then you can say. Ahh. Jim changed this line of the email on this date and
then Jane changed it again a week later.
It will save millions of dollars in bandwidth costs too.
On Fri,
Ah...
_That_ already exists. It's called Google wave.
https://wave.google.com/wave/
--
noonie
On 26 February 2010 12:00, Jonathan Parker jonathanparkerem...@gmail.comwrote:
What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and
versioning built into the email client.
Surely there must be some sort of canonical form to implementation,
otherwise we are not software makers and just duct taping hodge podge
together.
So there is a canonical form to bridge implementation. That explains why all
bridges look the same. No?
I studied both Computer Science and
Silky,
I have to disagree with you...
C#/VB is not the cure to all problems; there are other languages out there!
I have not used a business rules language as such, but I can see real value
in a language where you can show an end user the source code of a set of
business rules like...
Well, I believe you can read the current random port that it wants
to use from the config (so if you desired, you could do that).
However, you should be able to simply change the project properties so
that instead of using the inbuilt asp.net webservice, it uses your
local IIS one. Infact, you
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Greg Harris harris.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
Silky,
I have to disagree with you...
Be my guest.
C#/VB is not the cure to all problems; there are other languages out there!
I never said otherwise.
I have not used a business rules language as such, but I
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jonathan Parker
jonathanparkerem...@gmail.com wrote:
What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and
versioning built into the email client.
Then you can say. Ahh. Jim changed this line of the email on this date and
then Jane changed
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish I could agree with that, but how does what we as software
engineers do differs from the building or bridge engineers, surely
they don't build bridges or building on what they perceive to be the
right way.
But you're pretty fool.
--Original Message--
From: silky
To: Geoff Appleby
Cc: ausDotNet
ReplyTo: michaelsli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: unit testing in visual studio
Sent: Feb 26, 2010 14:45
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Geoff Appleby geoff.appl...@gmail.com wrote:
Heh.
I'm a fool.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Geoff Appleby geoff.appl...@gmail.com wrote:
But you're pretty fool.
...
So, what system are you using to run the unit tests though? Test Driven.NET?
I'm now slightly intrigued as to why it's randomly changing the port on you.
--
silky
Just the built in test projects that are part of 2008 team developer.
--Original Message--
From: silky
To: Geoff Appleby
Cc: ausDotNet
ReplyTo: michaelsli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: unit testing in visual studio
Sent: Feb 26, 2010 14:51
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Geoff Appleby
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Geoff Appleby geoff.appl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just the built in test projects that are part of 2008 team developer.
ohhh, I see. Well, I've never used that.
Have you looked at things like this?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404693(VS.80).aspx
--
You should use Invoke to open the splash form on the main UI thread.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zyzhdc6b.aspx
Nathan
From: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Anthony
Sent: Friday, 26 February 2010 12:50 PM
To: 'ausDotNet'
No I hadn't. But it have me an idea. Inside that file that I'd never thought
to look inside. In there the web service URL had a port specified of 0. So in
notepad I changed it to and its all behaving as expected now.
Cheers :)
--Original Message--
From: silky
To: Geoff Appleby
And how many times have you said that? :)
--Original Message--
From: silky
To: Geoff Appleby
Cc: ausDotNet
ReplyTo: michaelsli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: unit testing in visual studio
Sent: Feb 26, 2010 15:18
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Geoff Appleby geoff.appl...@gmail.com wrote:
No
Hi Anthony, I've just send you OFFLIST a copy of my splash screen class from
a few years ago. Just in case it might help.
The main form creates an instance of the splash class which runs its own
message loop in an STA thread. You can call methods of the class to display
progress messages from
I agree. I also think people are beginning to imagine email to be the
same as things like IM, SMS, etc. Obviously it's not.
I can take my original question/statement and expand it to include
instructions in email. More often than not (not an exaggeration this
time) people don't read my
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Geoff Appleby geoff.appl...@gmail.com wrote:
No I hadn't. But it have me an idea. Inside that file that I'd never thought
to look inside. In there the web service URL had a port specified of 0. So in
notepad I changed it to and its all behaving as
31 matches
Mail list logo
