SK == Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SK SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
SK .h.moc.cpp:
SK $(MOC) -o $@ $
SK On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:02:28PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
I have never tried it but it is somewhat hard to imagine some versions
of make accepting a suffix with two '.'s in
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:29:26PM -0600, Brian wrote:
The following doesn't seem to work:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
.moc.cpp:.h
$(MOC) -o $@ $
it's an explicit rule, which creates file .moc.cpp from file .h.
You have to use this:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
.h.moc.cpp:
$(MOC) -o
Can't wait to try this out. Thanks Stepan!
Brina
On 9/6/05, Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:29:26PM -0600, Brian wrote:
The following doesn't seem to work:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
.moc.cpp:.h
$(MOC) -o $@ $
it's an explicit rule, which creates
I am trying to find a portable way to replace this rule as given in AutoQt
[1], which the autotools warn against using:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
%.moc.cpp:%.h
$(MOC) -o $@ $
The following doesn't seem to work:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
.moc.cpp:.h
$(MOC) -o $@ $
The only other
I hate to say it, but it is more than ugly. As a maintainer, when forced
with the choice of leaving it as it is, which were it portable would be an
elegant solution, or replacing it with hundreds of rules that I will have to
maintain, I will leave it as it is.
If the autotools were to
Brian == Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian The following doesn't seem to work:
Brian SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
I have never tried it but it is somewhat hard to imagine some versions
of make accepting a suffix with two '.'s in it.
Brian The only other alternative I see is to enumerate a rule
Brian == Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian If the autotools were to recognize these pattern rules, scan
Brian the source and automatically generate portable rules for me, I
Brian would be a very happy customer indeed :)
Sorry, I thought that was what we were talking about.
In terms of just
