Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-05-08 Thread David Kelly
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:23:34AM -0600, Dennis Clark wrote: Why don't you both just use AVRMacPack? I didn't even KNOW about MacPack! Ditto. The site talks about using it with XCode, I use Eclipse, that shouldn't affect anything will it? I'll have to read up on this site,

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-05-08 Thread Rick Mann
On May 8, 2008, at 16:09:10, Dennis Clark wrote: I do wonder about the tool chain though - Is that not in the package? That is as much a hassle as the compiler to build. I've not looked, does this include the libs as well as the compiler? They tend to be related. I don't think it

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-05-08 Thread David Kelly
On May 8, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Rick Mann wrote: On May 8, 2008, at 16:09:10, Dennis Clark wrote: I do wonder about the tool chain though - Is that not in the package? That is as much a hassle as the compiler to build. I've not looked, does this include the libs as well as the compiler?

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-05-08 Thread Joshua Perry
Glad to see others working with AVR on the Mac! Good question about the source, maybe I'll send them an email about that. Though technically, like RedHat, they don't need to provide perfectly build-able source. libusb is for avrdude to be able to use the JTAG ICE and other usb connected

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-29 Thread Dave N6NZ
Rick Mann wrote: On Apr 28, 2008, at 17:14:38, Dave N6NZ wrote: Can someone point me to the simplest way to get the avr-gcc 4.2.2 tool chain running on OS X, with patches that sync up to the linux sticky thread in avrfreaks? I got it working using the scripts in the linux sticky thread

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-29 Thread Rick Mann
On Apr 28, 2008, at 23:57:56, Dave N6NZ wrote: So, the Bingo scripts worked as-is? I was under the impression that the standard 10.5 installation was at least missing tools. Um, well...I honestly don't recall! I would try them as-is. I think I slightly modified mine...they're enclosed.

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-28 Thread Steve Franks
Dave, You could steal the patches from FreeBSD's ports collection - most things that compile in a BSD variant are ready for OS X, no? Now mind you, I just looked in ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports and the whole thing is one big .tar.gz file, covering some 2 ports, but if you have the

RE: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-28 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Steve Franks Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today? Dave, You could steal

Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-28 Thread Dave N6NZ
Well, OS X, especially the new 10.5 release has just enough things missing and/or in odd places that most things build eventually not straight out of the box. I seem to recall seeing mac build instructions somewhere, but now it escapes me. I really just want to match the results I get on

RE: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today?

2008-04-28 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Dave N6NZ Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:33 PM To: AVR-GCC Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] OS X 4.2.2 -- simplest way today? Well, OS X, especially the new 10.5 release has just enough