You can also specify the methods to expose,
using the -m option.
Tony
Tim K. wrote on 01/12/2004 19:21:04:
Vy Ho wrote:
I wonder if you declare an interface for this service, then use
it to
generate wsdl.
This shields you from how you implement your service.
Right, that's the
Which in effect does the same thing, it creates an interface for you
with only those methods, right?
Personally I prefer defining the interface myself rather than doing it
via command line options, you get more compile time checking and catch
mistakes early than deal with sometimes obscure
Thanks Tim. The problem was that I changed some method from protected
to public so in essence public methods will be turned into Web
Methods. Since those methods take HTTPServletRequest and MessageContext
as parameters and no custom serializers were written to serialize such
types, therefore the
I wonder if you declare an interface for this service, then use it to
generate wsdl.
This shields you from how you implement your service.
Vy Ho wrote:
I wonder if you declare an interface for this service, then use it to
generate wsdl.
This shields you from how you implement your service.
Right, that's the way to do it, just create an interface for only the
methods you want exposed. The class can have a lot more stuff in it that
