Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-02-09 Thread john1
On 8 Feb 2007 at 10:39, Also Sprach Matt Sergeant: On 6-Feb-07, at 7:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I have some lengthy processes coming up in the near future. Should I wait for the job server to be written or will I have to implement the above? Assuming the latter :) Yeah

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-02-08 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 6-Feb-07, at 7:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I have some lengthy processes coming up in the near future. Should I wait for the job server to be written or will I have to implement the above? Assuming the latter :) Yeah :-( If I were you I'd have some sort of job-server (mod_perl

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-02-03 Thread Wayde Nie
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:20:37 +0100 Jörg Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I know there is no finished code yet. You'd have to write a plugin that calls fop somehow. Writing a simple plugin is easy, it should not take longer than an hour. Thanks, Can anyone suggest an existing

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-01-31 Thread Lars Skjærlund
Hi, Another point: Alternatively you could do what MailChannels do - talk to a mod_perl server to do slow stuff. I find that's probably a rather complicated way to do things, but I guess it works for them. That's exactly what I do as well ;-) Regards, Lars -- Lars Skjærlund Consultant

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-01-30 Thread john1
On 27 Jan 2007 at 13:20, Also Sprach Jörg Walter: So while a simple plugin would be enough for development purposes, when you go live you have to enhance that plugin to support asynchronous operation. That's not too hard, we're still talking about no more than 100 lines of code, but it's

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-01-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Jan 2007 at 13:20, Also Sprach Jörg Walter: So while a simple plugin would be enough for development purposes, when you go live you have to enhance that plugin to support asynchronous operation. That's not too hard, we're still talking about no more than 100

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-01-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
Matt Sergeant wrote: Yes. Though you have to be careful to close the listening socket in the forked child otherwise it might try and process connections (i.e. port 80 connections). Another point: Alternatively you could do what MailChannels do - talk to a mod_perl server to do slow stuff. I

Re: Axkit2 and Apache fop?

2007-01-27 Thread Jörg Walter
On Friday, 26. January 2007 22:50, Wayde Nie wrote: I didn't see anything in the archives, but can Axkit2 be used to process xml into pdf using Apache fop like Axkit1 was able to do? If so, can anyone provide a couple of pointers? I've currently got Axkit2 and fop (and their prerequisites)