Re: [Babel-users] [babel] draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-02

2017-06-06 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> I have implemented support for subtlvs and the mandatory bit in > Bird[1][2] and confirmed that it correctly discards source-specific > updates from Matthieu's branch. Thanks, Toke! I should be a little more free starting this week-end, I'll try to get mandatory bits in all remaining

Re: [Babel-users] Basic questions about babeld setup for Battlemesh

2017-06-06 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017, at 20:41, Jehan Tremback wrote: > No, our only way to configure nodes for any given protocol is a shell > script. I could make it write out a file, but I was trying to keep it > simple. Would a file help? No, I was looking for things outside of your message that might be

Re: [Babel-users] Basic questions about babeld setup for Battlemesh

2017-06-06 Thread Jehan Tremback
No, our only way to configure nodes for any given protocol is a shell script. I could make it write out a file, but I was trying to keep it simple. Would a file help? On Tuesday, June 6, 2017, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017, at 19:00, Jehan Tremback wrote: >

Re: [Babel-users] Basic questions about babeld setup for Battlemesh

2017-06-06 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017, at 19:00, Jehan Tremback wrote: > > > babeld -d 1 \ -C $command \ -C 'redistribute local deny' \ wlan1 Do you have a /etc/babeld.conf file by any chance? -- Gabriel ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Babel-users] Basic questions about babeld setup for Battlemesh

2017-06-06 Thread Jehan Tremback
Hi everyone, I volunteered to set up babeld for the Battlemesh testbed, since nobody else was going to do it. The testbed consists of some 2.4/5ghz wifi routers. The 2.4ghz radio is used for management, while the 5ghz radio runs the protocol being tested. Each routing protocol needs to have a

Re: [Babel-users] [babel] source sub-tlv

2017-06-06 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Juliusz Chroboczek writes: > I support (3). Last time I spoke to him, Toke supported (4). I am > opposed to (2). I can live with (1). Well, I can see the point in retaining wildcard requests for speeding up convergence when a new node joins a network. Don't recall expressing a