To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
but flash generally doesn't allow deep linking
How do you work that out?
On 10/15/07, ~:'' ありがとうございました。 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
apologies, can be a bit blunt if not downright wrong at times
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *cisnky
*Sent:* 27 October 2007 16:32
*To:* backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
but flash generally doesn't allow deep linking
How do you work that out?
On 10/15/07, ~:'' ありがとうございました。 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ~:''
Sent: 15 October 2007 09:21
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
Simon Jason,
maybe you are considering the webcam question doesn't need to be switch
accessible?
of course that makes the user
] On Behalf Of Jason Cartwright
Sent: 29 October 2007 09:55
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
Sound?
J
On 29/10/2007, Simon Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
sorry for late reply, I've been on holiday. I agree that the splash
16:32
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
but flash generally doesn't allow deep linking
How do you work that out?
On 10/15/07, ~:'' ありがとうございました。 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon,
apologies, can be a bit blunt if not downright wrong at times...
peepo.com
] On Behalf Of Adam
Sent: 29 October 2007 10:35
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
Jonathan,
Looks good however it is pretty pointless for the next year or so until SVG and
video tag support is available in any of the browser releases.
I'm extremely
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ~:''
Sent: 15 October 2007 09:21
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
Simon Jason,
maybe you are considering the webcam question doesn't need to be switch
accessible?
of course
Works fine for me... Camino on OSX.
J
On 13/10/2007, ~:'' ありがとうございました。 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some BBC staff have been known to trumpet the accessibility features
of flash.
the BBC is also known to have tied itself into this commercial vendor.
Can someone explain why on my OS X machine
Of ~:''
Sent: 13 October 2007 06:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: [backstage] flash accessibility
Some BBC staff have been known to trumpet the accessibility features of
flash.
the BBC is also known to have tied itself into this commercial vendor.
Can someone explain why on my
made flash unavailable.
S.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ~:''
Sent: 13 October 2007 06:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: [backstage] flash accessibility
Some BBC staff have been known to trumpet the accessibility
] On Behalf Of ~:''
Sent: 13 October 2007 06:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: [backstage] flash accessibility
Some BBC staff have been known to trumpet the accessibility features of
flash.
the BBC is also known to have tied itself into this commercial vendor.
Can someone
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ~:''
Sent: 15 October 2007 09:21
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
Simon Jason,
maybe you are considering the webcam question doesn't need to be switch
accessible?
of course
Subject: Re: [backstage] flash accessibility
Simon Jason,
maybe you are considering the webcam question doesn't need to be switch
accessible?
of course that makes the user dependent on others and is 'frustrating'
to say the least...
Camino 2007101201 2.0a1pre, the smaller window pops open, but seems
Some BBC staff have been known to trumpet the accessibility features
of flash.
the BBC is also known to have tied itself into this commercial vendor.
Can someone explain why on my OS X machine at least the supposedly
switch accessible:
14 matches
Mail list logo
