On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:34 PM Akibu Flash wrote:
>
>
> I backup a couple of Windows machines to a linux machine via rsync. However,
> the backup for one of the Windows machines never finishes and results in a
> partial backup. In the CGI user interface Count column, the backup always
>
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:29 AM Kim Scarborough wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently started using BackupPC, and I'm pretty happy with it. I don't
> understand, however, the point of full backups beyond the initial one. Once
> you've got everything, shouldn't incremental backups be sufficient going
Hi Akibu
One of two ways.
1. On the Win10 machine: set up a new shares with paths describing
parts of the drive e.g. d:\Documents and d:\not_Documents rather than
just d:\ And on backuppc create new hosts with the new share names
under 'RsyncShareName'.
2. Or leave the Win10 share the
Hello,
I recently started using BackupPC, and I'm pretty happy with it. I don't
understand, however, the point of full backups beyond the initial one.
Once you've got everything, shouldn't incremental backups be sufficient
going forward?
___
Thanks George for responding.
With respect to your reference to: “split the host into two”, how does one
actually do that? My host references a certain computer consisting of various
drives to be backed up. How does one split that host into two separate hosts
and (presumably) back up each of
Hi,
Yes you could create several rsyncsharename sections for the different folders.
Or you could explicit exclude some folders from 1 share and create a seperate
share to create a backup. You can even create multiple 'hosts' with each it's
own share to backup different shares. In that case
Thanks Micha.
This may be a silly question, but how does one split the backup into several
parts? Does that involve designating certain folders from a particular drive
for backup instead of the entire drive?
From: Micha Kersloot
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 9:28 AM
To: General list for user
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:02 AM wrote:
>
> ACLs are not supported in 3.x but are supported in 4.x
> Not sure --fake-super is supported but --super is supported.
Yeah, I've just noticed that I'm not on v4, it didn't click until now.
I'm attempting an upgrade to 4 now.
Just out of curiosity, why use 'rsyncd' rather than 'rsync' which to
me seems more secure as well as easier to set up and support?
George King wrote at about 15:44:03 + on Thursday, March 3, 2022:
> No great suggestions for resolution from me but I have some sympathy
> with you having had
ACLs are not supported in 3.x but are supported in 4.x
Not sure --fake-super is supported but --super is supported.
ralph strebbing wrote at about 10:35:24 -0500 on Thursday, March 3, 2022:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm attempting to set-up BackupPC for use with our linux server
> infrastructure, using
No great suggestions for resolution from me but I have some sympathy
with you having had similar issues occasionally in the past.
I have a number of rsyncd hosts set up on my main Win10 desktop -
basically one for each disk or part of to keep the backups down to a
reasonable duration. I'm
Hi All,
I'm attempting to set-up BackupPC for use with our linux server
infrastructure, using either rsync or rsyncd. I'm currently running
the Ubuntu package of BackupPC (Version 3.3.2-3), with rsync_bpc
version 3.1.3.0 protocol version 31.
So far things work great! However, I'm running into
Hi,
you could try to split the backup in several parts?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Kersloot
[ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ]
[ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ]
[ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ https://www.zimbra-nederland.nl/
| www.zimbra-nederland.nl ] | Volg [
Just bumping this up... any suggestions for a resolution? Thanks.
From: Akibu Flash
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 4:32 PM
To: BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied
Dear All,
I backup a couple of Windows machines to a linux
14 matches
Mail list logo
