Hi Hans-Jürgen,
One reason why I would favor to have an XQuery implementation first is
because it would allow us to define the semantics behind this
function. There are currently lots of questions that are unclear to
me, so it’s mostly conceptual questions that would need to be solved
before such
Hi Hans-Jürgen,
Sounds like an interesting idea. As the output of xquery:parse is XML,
the xquery:data-paths function could probably be written in XQuery
itself?
Best,
Christian
_
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Hans-Juergen Rennau wrote:
>
Dear BaseX team,
perhaps I hear an opinion about the following idea.
(1) The function xquery:parse is already immensely useful as it allows to
*validate* XPath expressions, as for example used in configuration data. (A
practical example: the XPath expressions used in JMeter [1] test plans in
> The problem was that I wanted to add files to the /webapp directory, but
> once the Dockerfile defines it as volume you can't modify it as part of
> the container definition, you can only mount to it from outside.
>
> My general approach is to have two images, one without the volumes, for
> use
The problem was that I wanted to add files to the /webapp directory, but
once the Dockerfile defines it as volume you can't modify it as part of
the container definition, you can only mount to it from outside.
My general approach is to have two images, one without the volumes, for
use in defining
Hi Eliot,
> Looks like this version addresses the issue I had
> (creating volumes in the base container made it impossible to add repos or
> webapps in using Dockerfiles).
that's also one of the issues the earlier Dockerfile of Dirk and Michael
had -- and I also had issues with that when I
Cool--I'll try it as soon as I can. I have my own BaseX-based container
with a custom Web app working now, but based on my own small mod of an
earlier Dockerfile. Looks like this version addresses the issue I had
(creating volumes in the base container made it impossible to add repos or
webapps in
Dear BaseX community,
over the last weeks, interest in Docker utilization with BaseX hevily
increased, and several images have been proposed. I've already made some
experience running a BaseX pet project in BaseX for about a year now,
and together with the BaseX core team created an image based
> Christian Grün :
>> Could it be something to do with the namespacing in the document?
> If your document has namespaces, you can use a wildcard for your prefix…
> • count(//*:A/*), count(//*:B/*)
> • for $c in /*:Top/* return count($c/*)
> or define the prefix
I suspect that using the REST API directly is the answer, although if I
understand the Ruby client code, it's using direct socket connections,
which would be more efficient.
Not a critical issue at the moment but something I need to understand more
fully before too long.
Cheers,
E.
Eliot
> Hmm. Is there a way to send other encodings to the server via the remote
> API?
A difficult one for me to answer, because I have never worked with
Ruby before… Maybe there are some other users on the list who can
reply on this?
> I'm on my way to Japan for a workshop where we'll be using my
Hmm. Is there a way to send other encodings to the server via the remote
API?
I'm on my way to Japan for a workshop where we'll be using my system and
Japanese-language documents are more efficiently stored in UTF-16 so my
expectation is that users will either already have documents in that
Wow. You guys don't stop to amaze. Chris's suggestion would've worked.
Andy's suggestion was what I actually had in mind when I wrote the
post.
So he reads my mind, Chris adds a new feature and all that before the
clock of 10 less than 12 hours after the post. And that, probably,
with a good
> a base-uri set. I wonder if there is a case for adding base-uri to the
> xquery:eval options map to handle this in a cleaner way?
…now there is [1,2]. New features in the documentation will be marked
with 8.5, but they will already available in the snapshots and patch
versions.
[1]
> Could it be something to do with the namespacing in the document?
If your document has namespaces, you can use a wildcard for your prefix…
• count(//*:A/*), count(//*:B/*)
• for $c in /*:Top/* return count($c/*)
or define the prefix in the query prolog:
declare namespace abc = 'http:...';
15 matches
Mail list logo