On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(bbdb-search-simple nil who)
Ronan It does actually use this function, if you trace down the chain of
Ronan calls. However, I can't actually see offhand why it'd fail a
Ronan case-insensitive search. Can you set a debug
for testing, so I tried
(bbdb-search-simple nil [EMAIL PROTECTED])
and the it turned correctly the entry
- I did it again with
(bbdb-search-simple nil [EMAIL PROTECTED])
and the it turned correctly the entry.
So far so good.
So I tried edebug-defun on spam-check-BBDB (I
Ted == Ted Zlatanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ted On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(bbdb-search-simple nil who)
hi
using edebug, I think the error occurs in this line
(intern-soft who bbdb-cache))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following gets evaluated.
Hello
(bbdb-search-simple nil who)
(Bbdb/gnus-show-sender seem not to use this function.)
Ronan It does actually use this function, if you trace down the chain of
Ronan calls. However, I can't actually see offhand why it'd fail a
Ronan case-insensitive search. Can you
. However, I can't actually see offhand why it'd fail a
Ronan case-insensitive search. Can you set a debug breakpoint at
Ronan bbdb-search-simple (it's in bbdb.el) and give me a stack trace on a
Ronan failing address?
Hi
I tried to use edebug-defun on spam-check-BBDB
I then made g to get
On December 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(bbdb-search-simple nil who)
(Bbdb/gnus-show-sender seem not to use this function.)
It does actually use this function, if you trace down the chain of
calls. However, I can't actually see offhand why it'd fail a
case-insensitive search. Can you set a
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will not be recognised, by the bbdb based splitting method (however
when applying bbdb/gnus-show-sender the address is correctly
associated with the bbdb entry) , even if I put it explicitly in the
Hello
I am using gnus+bbdd+spam-split
As you may be know gnus comes with the nnimap-split-fancy backend that
allows to use bbdb as a white list.
A typical setting is:
(setq
nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy
nnimap-split-inbox INBOX
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004, Uwe Brauer said:
On 2 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the rise of the spam plague, I've been finding it difficult to
figure out how to configure BBDB's auto-address snarfing.
My problem is the following: if I use bbdb-ignore-most-messages,
then I get
how about this one:
http://www.deas.harvard.edu/climate/eli/Downloads/rmail-spam-filter/#bbdb
From: Robert P. Goldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bbdb-info [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question about using BBDB in spam-laden days
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:59:31 -0500
With the rise of the spam plague, I've
On August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
With the rise of the spam plague, I've been finding it difficult to
figure out how to configure BBDB's auto-address snarfing.
Because of the fact that everyone has different criteria for what they
do and don't want to file, BBDB has always allowed you
With the rise of the spam plague, I've been finding it difficult to
figure out how to configure BBDB's auto-address snarfing.
My problem is the following: if I use bbdb-ignore-most-messages, then
I get practically nothing. But if I use bbdb-ignore-some-messages, I
end up with a BBDB clogged
On Friday, July 11, 2003 at 12:39:09, Ted Stern wrote:
When reading a mailing list in CVS Gnus via Gmane
(gmane.comp.tex.pdftex), I run into some problems when I display an
article written by somebody who is already in my .bbdb file. That's
because this gmane group has settings to
Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've had the discussion before -- the mailing list works fine for
me. I just filter the crap. I use statistical spam filtering for
Gnus, but I also have a very simple splitting rule that does away
with all Korean mails. Try it. It works
Stefan Reichör [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Alex Schroeder told this:
We've had the discussion before -- the mailing list works fine for
me. I just filter the crap. I use statistical spam filtering for
Gnus, but I also have a very simple splitting rule that does away
From my gnus nnmail-split-fancy value:
;; anything in character sets I can't read anyway.
(content-type
charset=\?\\(big5\\|ks_c_5601-1987\\|ISO-2022-KR\\|gb2312\\|euc[-_]kr\\|koi8-r\\)
spam)
(subject .*=\\?\\(ks_c_5601-1987\\|gb2312\\|euc-kr\\|koi8-r\\) spam)
doesn't catch
We've had the discussion before -- the mailing list works fine for
me. I just filter the crap. I use statistical spam filtering for
Gnus, but I also have a very simple splitting rule that does away with
all Korean mails. Try it. It works. :)
Alex
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Alex Schroeder told this:
We've had the discussion before -- the mailing list works fine for
me. I just filter the crap. I use statistical spam filtering for
Gnus, but I also have a very simple splitting rule that does away
with all Korean mails. Try it. It works
in our
factory.
FONT color=#ff size=-1 face=Century GothicBWe are the
oldest and largest canned food manufacturer and exporter in China
since 1923
Great. They spam for Spam. Spam, Spam, Spam and Eggs.
This List is getting more chinesespam than me. Perhaps it's time to
surrender
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:49:17 +0100 Ronan Waide wrote:
Ronan On June 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
can the admin please change this list so that only subscribers can
post? the spam is annoying as hell.
Ronan The admin, who has been slack of late (combination of vacation, new
Ronan job, and broken
Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Subject =?ks_c_5601-1987 mail.spam)
Maybe Patrick's SO is Korean...
kai
--
Silence is foo!
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas
can the admin please change this list so that only subscribers can
post? the spam is annoying as hell.
-p
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com
I am not getting that much spam in my BBDB folders. I see you are
using VM, not Gnus, so I cannot help you with your filtering, but one
of the most effective filters I ever used is the one that goes by
weird coding sets. At the moment this rule seems to catch most of my
mailing list spam
I installed bbdb some year ago and only recently remembered about it
long enough to turn it on... Very nice. 1098 contacts in my database in
a week and a half...
Alas, lots of lame spam. No set of filters is perfect.
What I'd really like to do is be able to rank every sender and have
"Ronan" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronan Noah Friedman has some generic vcard stuff on splode.com that may
Ronan serve as a starting point. As for not picking up spam addresses,
That's what I have installed now.
Ronan please read the section of the ma
On February 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
That's what I have installed now.
Someone on the list mentioned hacking vcard support some time ago, but
I've not seen any followup on it. Feel free to rectify this.
Yes, I knew that I could filter like that.
I asked about ranking
ronan One of BBDB's provided hook functions allow you to create a
ronan two-part filter, whereby certain things are accepted by
ronan default, certain are rejected by default, and the remainder are
ronan optionally offered for your attention. See recent mailing list
ronan traffic (search the
27 matches
Mail list logo
