Re: again: ; bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender
On Fri Jul 27 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: I just enter the article (by hitting 'n', 'SPC' or mouse in the *Summary* buffer). OK, it seems you are using bbdb-mua-auto-update which by default displays both sender(s) and recipients. Similarly bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender should operate on sender(s) only, but never on recipients. Alas, this is not what I observe. I cannot reproduce this. Can you check more carefully what is happening in your case? -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
Re: again: ; bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender
On Wed Jul 25 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: I set bbdb-message-all-addresses to t so that I see both the sender of a message and all the CC recipients. Which command do you use to see these records? With bbdb-mua-display-records you get sender and recipients, whereas bbdb-mua-display-sender gives you senders only. And bbdb-mua-display-recipients gives you recipients only. (Here the only exception is specified by bbdb-message-try-all-headers.) This should be independent of your setting for bbdb-message-all-addresses. This variable only affects whether these commands take the first record for the first sender or recipient, or whether they take all recors for all senders / recipients. However, when I hit ;, I want to edit the notes of the _sender_ only (and it did work like that until recently), not of all the other recipients Similarly bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender should operate on sender(s) only, but never on recipients. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
Re: again: ; bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2012-07-27 04:39:26 -0500]: On Wed Jul 25 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: I set bbdb-message-all-addresses to t so that I see both the sender of a message and all the CC recipients. Which command do you use to see these records? I just enter the article (by hitting 'n', 'SPC' or mouse in the *Summary* buffer). (and it did work like that until recently), not of all the other recipients Similarly bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender should operate on sender(s) only, but never on recipients. Alas, this is not what I observe. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://think-israel.org http://honestreporting.com http://www.memritv.org http://palestinefacts.org http://memri.org Perl: all stupidities of UNIX in one. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
again: ; bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender
I set bbdb-message-all-addresses to t so that I see both the sender of a message and all the CC recipients. However, when I hit ;, I want to edit the notes of the _sender_ only (and it did work like that until recently), not of all the other recipients (as I just noticed actually happens now). This is an unfortunate change in behavior, although, yes, this new behavior could be desirable and it makes sense to enable it on, say, C-u ;. Since this has been discussed recently, I might be missing something, I am sorry if this is the case. Please remind me how to get the original behavior. Thanks. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://openvotingconsortium.org http://pmw.org.il http://memri.org UNIX is as friendly to you as you are to it. Windows is hostile no matter what. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
