In my report last week
with subject header "eudc conversion to bbdb (in bbdb3.1.2?)"
I noted
bbdd-version => 3.1.2
and I claimed I was using the MELPA bbdb.
That was actually inaccurate - I had failed to snip a setting of
load-path pointing to a directory for bbdb that I had populated via gi
Thomas Fitzsimmons writes:
> "Roland Winkler" writes:
>
>> One option could be to incorporate the core of BBDB into GNU Emacs
>> and keep the loose ends in savannah.nongnu.org. BBDB has a long
>> history of having a core plus many add-ons.
>
> I really like this idea. Then we could count on BB
On Sat Nov 21 2015 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Didn't BBDB have some copyright issues that precluded its
> distribution with Emacs or under the same license? (Apologies if
> I'm misremembering.)
No, you are perfectly right. BBDB v2 *did* have copyright issues.
BBDB v3 on savannah.nongnu.org is essent
On Sat Nov 21 2015 John Wiegley wrote:
> I would much prefer this to be in "tarball ELPA", so that it is
> included in the distribution, but not a focus for the other
> developers. Would there be any need to include it within core
> itself?
The question is to what extent one wants to consider BBD
On Sat Nov 21 2015 George McNinch wrote:
> That was actually inaccurate - I had failed to snip a setting of
> load-path pointing to a directory for bbdb that I had populated via git
> (and that seemed to be the version of bbdb being used).
Which git repository did you use? The "official" reposito
On Sat Nov 21 2015 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> I guess was thinking that having a stable and ration API, rather
> than just exporting some internal functions etc, might encourage
> people to build good conduits to/from Google Contacts, Android,
> iPhone, skype, etc etc.
Sure, this was really wha
On Sat, Nov 21 2015, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I might add to this a clearer API for the "noticing" functionality of
> BBDB -- ie, make it easier to write the hooks for "doing things to
> BBDB records when you receive mails from/compose mails to those
> records.
I didn't see your posting on the bbd
Hi--
RW> On Sat Nov 21 2015 George McNinch wrote:
>> That was actually inaccurate - I had failed to snip a setting of
>> load-path pointing to a directory for bbdb that I had populated
>> via git (and that seemed to be the version of bbdb being used).
RW> Which git repository
Roland Winkler writes:
> On Sat, Nov 21 2015, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> I might add to this a clearer API for the "noticing" functionality of
>> BBDB -- ie, make it easier to write the hooks for "doing things to
>> BBDB records when you receive mails from/compose mails to those
>> records.
>
> I
On Sat Nov 21 2015 George McNinch wrote:
> This behavior of a MELPA install is what I was trying to report.
> Surely there is *some* way to have the MELPA install process
> "properly make" BBDB?
I do not know many details about MELPA. Yet it uses an automated
scheme where I was told it was not re
10 matches
Mail list logo