[Jbeta] glgridscroll in new grid?

2006-07-21 Thread bill lam
J504 has command glgridscroll row col ; scrolled rows and columns what is its equivalent in J601 grid control? -- regards, bill -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

RE: [Jbeta] glgridscroll in new grid?

2006-07-21 Thread Henry Rich
What I do to set the vertical scroll position in the grid x is: Scrollr__x =: desired_scroll_position show__x '' Henry Rich -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bill lam Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 3:55 AM To: Beta forum Subject:

[Jbeta] D. broken

2006-07-21 Thread John Randall
As Philip Viton noted in the General forum, D. gives strange results. This is true even for rank 0 functions. f=:% (f d. (i.6)) 1 1 _1 2 _6 24 _120 (f D. (i.6)) 1 1 _1 1.9984 111022 _3.33067e12 7.77156e19 This is not a new problem: the same occurs with J504. I assume there is some

Re: [Jbeta] another ole crash

2006-07-21 Thread Eric Iverson
At first I assumed another utf-8 bug. But I have stepped through the code very carefully and can't find anything wrong. My regretful (and possibly incorrect) conclusion is that this is a bug in the control and that for successful use you must set subitems in order. The fact that j504 always

[Jbeta] x m} y

2006-07-21 Thread Roger Hui
The amend page of the dictionary http://www.jsoftware.com/books/help/dictionary/d530n.htm currently reads: If m is not a gerund, x m} y is formed by replacing by x those parts of y selected by m{ . In the next J6.01 beta, it has been changed to read: If m is not a gerund, x m} y is formed

Re: [Jbeta] x m} y

2006-07-21 Thread greg heil
On 7/21/06, Roger Hui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If m is not a gerund, x m} y is formed by replacing by x those parts of y selected by m{ (an error is signalled if such selection requires fill). i like that: it will expose any problems in users code, and open the way in the future for new

Re: [Jbeta] another ole crash

2006-07-21 Thread Oleg Kobchenko
Thank you for looking into it. As I said, it's a wierd mystery. I was suspecting maybe passing a slightly off value, like incorrect BSTR. But, let me try first to mock the indexer and see what it gets. - Original Message From: Eric Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Beta forum

[Jbeta] Re: x m} y

2006-07-21 Thread Mark D. Niemiec
Roger Hui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The amend page of the dictionary http://www.jsoftware.com/books/help/dictionary/d530n.htm currently reads: If m is not a gerund, x m} y is formed by replacing by x those parts of y selected by m{ . In the next J6.01 beta, it has been changed to read:

Re: [Jbeta] another ole crash

2006-07-21 Thread Oleg Kobchenko
I tried the mock and didn't find anything plausible. BSTR is OK. J retains the ownership of the argument of property_put, so the callee is supposed to make a copy. But that doesn't contradict with other uses: Scripting.Dictionary works fine with that; ListView itself makes its own separate copies