Bill,
Yes, you are right, the extraction needs to apply to ~temp/t.jt .
The 'c' likely needs to be to ~addons/t.jt -- not ~temp/t.jt -- also.
But when I do that, the file shows up in ~addons as t.jt and I cannot
change the name to ~addons/math/misc . I am missing some steps,
clearly.
On Mon, Jun
I made a couple of sloppy typos in the instructions. I will repeat them
below with the typos corrected. Please try again. It helps to have an
overview of what is going on and to have an understanding of tar and how jt
provides similar facilities. That is 'c' creates, 'x' extracts, and 't'
tests
Eric,
Ok, I see what I was not doing: anything involving jattach. I was attaching
t.jt to the email.
But now I have a different problem. The jattach.html file is so large with
math/misc that it does not fit in the copy buffer. How is that problem worked
around?
Thanks,
---
(B=)
It worked for me so there is something limiting in your environment or
there is something wrong with the steps.
Which copy buffer? On your desktop or on the iPad?
If you have not already done so, please get familiar with successfully
moving several single files from your desktop to your iPad
On my ipad, in gmail, I do not see the attachment in safari. I see it
it gmail. I do not use mail exactly, I use gmail.
The attachment is an html file.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Eric Iverson eric.b.iver...@gmail.com wrote:
To repeat with emphasis: the jattach step and attaching the
You see the attachment jattach.html in your email message. Tap it and you
should see your stuff in a browser page that you can then tap and hold and
copy.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Brian Schott schott.br...@gmail.comwrote:
On my ipad, in gmail, I do not see the attachment in safari. I
Try the following on your iPad:
jh'a href=http://www.jsoftware.com/docs/help701/dictionary/vocabul.htm
vocab/a'
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
I only raised it because it is so bad compared to everyone else I've
looked at, including mine. An original copy of my result and my
implementation code are available on request. Please note, I cannot
speak for others but I didn't take a Hilbert matrix into account in
writing mine.
Paul
Don't you become even a bit suspicious when the answers don't agree?
Consider the number on the lower right hand corner:
PLJsAPL: 2815820646.25489
Dyalog: 2815825985
NARS2000:2815820182
J Rational: 2815827300 (true answer).
If you are proud of implementation X, I can bring it down
