Hello all,
I have a problem that my DHCPv6 DDNS update which works reliably with
IPv4 doesn't work at all when we implemented
the dual-stack operation. There is not even a warning, notice or error
in the log. No syntax errors in the config /etc/dhcp/dhcpd6.conf file.
We are running Debian 10
Hello all,
I have a problem that my DHCPv6 DDNS update which works reliably with
IPv4 doesn't work at all when we implemented
the dual-stack operation. There is not even a warning, notice or error
in the log. No syntax errors in the config /etc/dhcp/dhcpd6.conf file.
We are running Debian 10
. It would prevent people from using Internet on all
of our locations. Windows 10 just doesn't know how to use the second
nameserver in DHCP list, if first is not performing well. The system
became unusable campus-wide ...
Mirsad
On 6/4/2022 12:36 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mirsad Goran Todorovac
stfromrdataset:
error reading /var/cache/bind/keys/Kalu.hr.+013+43987.private: file
not found
Hope these pointers help.
- Matthijs
On 01-06-2022 23:14, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Dear All,
I have tried to switch from manually signed DNSSEC zone to
dnssec-policy "standard", and
Dear All,
I have tried to switch from manually signed DNSSEC zone to dnssec-policy
"standard", and BIND9 server started
behaving odd. Here is the manual signing conf:
include "/etc/bind/keys/domac.alu.hr-tsig.key";
zone "alu.hr" in {
type master;
file
, which of course is not much security at all. I've
never had luck getting AD admins to offer anything better. I'm
definitely no AD expert myself.
One possibility of course is to secure at the IP layer, a.k.a. IPsec.
You could secure all traffic between the servers with transport mode
AH. Th
documented features, but right now
I am presented
with a problem I can't seem to solve because it is not an open system.
Thanks for any help.
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
--
Mirsad Goran Todorovac
CARNet sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
--
CAR
documented features, but right now
I am presented
with a problem I can't seem to solve because it is not an open system.
Thanks for any help.
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
--
Mirsad Goran Todorovac
CARNet sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
--
CAR
documented features, but right now
I am presented
with a problem I can't seem to solve because it is not an open system.
Thanks for any help.
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
--
Mirsad Goran Todorovac
CARNet sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
--
CAR
2giVp04ZC0agS+rPaCQZgeUXuneUk
5wle1qc5GF+R3E8rheTioWPJLw+L2V/n39LYOlQ= )
;; Query time: 189 usec
;; SERVER: 161.53.235.3#53(161.53.235.3)
;; WHEN: Wed May 18 17:34:31 CEST 2022
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 251
root@domac:/var/cache/bind#
Can you please help?
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Mirsad
On
hostnames and report a problem globally.
Kind regards,
Mirsad
On 12/30/2021 12:43 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Please excuse me, as I am a bit confused ...
I have tried to verify your findings, but I've found something awkward:
Something has changed, because ear
that the delegation of the
192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa is in the zone 186.198.193.in-addr.arpa?
Moment ago it was all so clear to me, but now it seems hieroglyphic
again :-(
Any idea? Thank you ...
Kind regards,
Mirsad
On 12/29/2021 6:57 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote
On 12/29/2021 6:57 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
I have recently implemented dynamic updates to a sub /24 reverse DNS
domain, 193.198.186.192/27.
I had upstream domain 192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. delegated from
authoritative servers.
However, something still isn't
Hello,
I have recently implemented dynamic updates to a sub /24 reverse DNS
domain, 193.198.186.192/27.
I had upstream domain 192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. delegated from
authoritative servers.
However, something still isn't right. In some reverse PTR addresses, the
resolver sees first
Dear Roberto,
It is hard to say without seeing the named.conf.local, but are you sure
you have incremented the serial?
Kind regards,
Mirsad
On 12/13/2021 7:24 PM, Roberto Carna wrote:
Dear all, I have BIND 9 and Webmin. One master and one slave using zne
ransfer with TSIG
Everything was Ok
c
;; SERVER: 2001:b68:c:2::70:0#53(2001:b68:c:2::70:0)
;; WHEN: Sun Dec 12 22:06:50 PST 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 88
On 2021-12-12 06:45, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Hello Crist,
I have implemented the recommended changes. It works forward and
reverse for the test record, from out doma
the name resolution is more stable with the
secondary (slave) servers for the zone.
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
On 13.12.2021. 9:25, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Hello Crist,
The good news is that it seems that the dynamic DDNS update from DHCP
works!
See here a snap from /var/log/syslog:
Dec
PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
; COOKIE: 341626673209a23b4777d39761b6e2f9656e01a40d454dcd (good)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. IN NS
;; Query time: 181 msec
;; SERVER: 2001:b68:c:2::70:0#53(2001:b68:c:2::70:0)
;; WHEN: Sun Dec 12 22:06:50 PST 2021
;; MSG
with DHCP DDNS updates. :-)
You said ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY but I am an open source fan and I can
live with that ;-)
Until tomorrow, then ...
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
On 12/12/2021 10:33 AM, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Hi Crist,
Now the resolution from the problematic record started
if
something becomes virus infected or even spambot, and not have to browse
DHCP leases in forensic analysis, which my fellow administrator probably
would not know how to do ...
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
On 12/12/2021 10:19 AM, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Hi Crist,
Thank you for your
86.198.193.in-addr.arpa to
test-record.slava.alu.hr <http://test-record.slava.alu.hr>. and
resolving 193.198.186.195 that apparently fails?
Is there a way to see more interim debugging output?
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
On 12/11/2021 10:25 AM, M
ORIGIN 192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.
193 IN CNAME 193.186.198.193.rev.example.com
<http://193.186.198.193.rev.example.com>.
194 IN CNAME 194.186.198.193.rev.example.com
<http://194.186.198.193.rev.example.com>.
…
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:51 PM Mirsad Goran Todorovac
wrote:
Hello,
186.198.193.rev.example.com
<http://193.186.198.193.rev.example.com>.
194 IN CNAME 194.186.198.193.rev.example.com
<http://194.186.198.193.rev.example.com>.
…
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:51 PM Mirsad Goran Todorovac
wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with DHCP DDNS update to BIND 9 re
max-lease-time 86400; } | Thank you very much for your time
reading this mail and help. Kind regards, -- Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Academy of Fine Arts | Faculty of Graphic Arts University of Zagreb |
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/l
24 matches
Mail list logo
