Re: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-03-01 Thread Nick Tait via bind-users
On 02/03/2024 11:36, Greg Choules wrote: Please don't encourage using "search" in resolv.conf or the Windows equivalent. Search domains make queries take longer, impose unnecessary load on resolvers and make diagnosis of issues harder because, when users say "it doesn't work" you have no idea

Re: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-03-01 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Please don't encourage using "search" in resolv.conf or the Windows equivalent. Search domains make queries take longer, impose unnecessary load on resolvers and make diagnosis of issues harder because, when users say "it doesn't work" you have no idea what it was that didn't work. I tried using

Re: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-03-01 Thread Nick Tait via bind-users
On 02/03/2024 03:42, Mike Mitchell via bind-users wrote: Our networking team is in the habit of entering the IP address of every network interface on a router under one name. The very first address entry is their out-of-band management interface. "rrset-order fixed" is used on their domain

RE: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-03-01 Thread Mike Mitchell via bind-users
Our networking team is in the habit of entering the IP address of every network interface on a router under one name. The very first address entry is their out-of-band management interface. "rrset-order fixed" is used on their domain for address records, so they can ssh to the router by name

Re: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-03-01 Thread Stacey Marshall
On 29 Feb 2024, at 21:39, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hey, > > BIND 9 supports a fixed rrset ordering (that is keeping the order of the > RRSets from the zone file). It has to be configured > at the compile time, it takes more memory (to record that order) and it's a > #ifdef all over the places. >

Re: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-02-29 Thread Matt Nordhoff via bind-users
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:38 AM Matt Nordhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Hey, > > > > BIND 9 supports a fixed rrset ordering (that is keeping the order of the > > RRSets from the zone file). It has to be configured > > at the compile time, it takes more

Re: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?

2024-02-29 Thread Matt Nordhoff via bind-users
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hey, > > BIND 9 supports a fixed rrset ordering (that is keeping the order of the > RRSets from the zone file). It has to be configured > at the compile time, it takes more memory (to record that order) and it's a > #ifdef all over the