limit for cache-size?

2010-01-04 Thread Thomas Vogt
Hello Are there any limits in bind 9.6.* or 9.7.* for cache-size or know issues? I'm planing to use 8GB ram for named cache. Regards, Thomas Vogt ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: limit for cache-size?

2010-01-04 Thread Alan Clegg
Thomas Vogt wrote: Are there any limits in bind 9.6.* or 9.7.* for cache-size or know issues? I'm planing to use 8GB ram for named cache. The LRU cache cleaning introduced in BIND 9.5.0 should make your large cache work as expected. AlanC ___

Re: File Descriptor limit and malfunction bind

2010-01-04 Thread Kevin Darcy
What's your hard limit (ulimit -n -H)? named seems to use, by default, the OS hard limit on file descriptors, even though the ARM says The default is |unlimited|. . When it starts up as superuser, in theory it should be able to set both the hard and soft limit to infinity, but it doesn't

Re: BIND 9.6.1-P1 crashing

2010-01-04 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:23:17 +0100, Dario Miculinic dario.miculi...@t-com.hr wrote: I'm administrating 4 DNS servers running CentOS release 5.4 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2. with BIND version 9.6.1-P1. On 3 of them BIND crashed 7 times in last 10 days. There's nothing in

Re: File Descriptor limit and malfunction bind

2010-01-04 Thread Shumon Huque
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:43:52PM -0500, Kevin Darcy wrote: named seems to use, by default, the OS hard limit on file descriptors, even though the ARM says The default is |unlimited|. . When it starts up as superuser, in theory it should be able to set both the hard and soft limit to