Hello
Are there any limits in bind 9.6.* or 9.7.* for cache-size or know
issues? I'm planing to use 8GB ram for named cache.
Regards,
Thomas Vogt
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Thomas Vogt wrote:
Are there any limits in bind 9.6.* or 9.7.* for cache-size or know
issues? I'm planing to use 8GB ram for named cache.
The LRU cache cleaning introduced in BIND 9.5.0 should make your large
cache work as expected.
AlanC
___
What's your hard limit (ulimit -n -H)?
named seems to use, by default, the OS hard limit on file descriptors,
even though the ARM says The default is |unlimited|. . When it starts
up as superuser, in theory it should be able to set both the hard and
soft limit to infinity, but it doesn't
At Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:23:17 +0100,
Dario Miculinic dario.miculi...@t-com.hr wrote:
I'm administrating 4 DNS servers running CentOS release 5.4 and Red Hat
Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2. with BIND
version 9.6.1-P1. On 3 of them BIND crashed 7 times in last 10 days. There's
nothing in
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:43:52PM -0500, Kevin Darcy wrote:
named seems to use, by default, the OS hard limit on file descriptors,
even though the ARM says The default is |unlimited|. . When it starts
up as superuser, in theory it should be able to set both the hard and
soft limit to
5 matches
Mail list logo