I want to get some feedback.. I've used distributed version control
systems for a long time, and the most useful feature is to be able
to merge two different forks.
So what's the equivalent of this for Bitcoin or other crypto-currencies?
Let's suppose that me and my friends get 'islanded' from
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 02:48:14PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
I want to get some feedback.. I've used distributed version control
systems for a long time, and the most useful feature is to be able
to merge two
Are there any bitcoin to fiat currency processors (like bitpay,
coinbase, etc) that allow testing using the bitcoin testnet?
It seems most of the credit card payment processor apis have
features to allow developers to do testing without 'real money',
what's the equivalent of this for bitcoin
But I think it's great people can choose how to trade privacy for
computation/bandwidth however they want, and services can compete to
offer monitoring for 0+ bit prefixes.
Its not a decision with user localised effect. If most users use it with
parameters giving high elimination
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:32:31PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jeremy Spilman jer...@taplink.co wrote:
Choosing how many bits to put in the prefix may be difficult, particularly
if transaction load changes dramatically over time. 0 or 1 bits may be
just
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 05:25:41PM +, Luke-Jr wrote:
On Sunday, February 09, 2014 5:12:14 PM Peter Todd wrote:
We have an embedded consensus system and we want to be able to upgrade
it with new rules.
This asserts a central authority and gives developers too much power.
I don't quite
The only 'assertion' of central authority here is people who download and
run the code and submit to whatever the code asserts they are supposed to
do.
At least with the 'central authority' of the big-business bitcoin developer
cabal I can read the code before I submit to it's
Okay, why the everloving FUCK is there not someone on this list with a
@mtgox.com address talking about this?
I started using bitcoin because I could audit the code, and when the
developer cabal does stuff 'off-list' what you do is hand over market
manipulation power to the selected cabal of
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Isidor Zeuner wrote:
What is the official response from the Bitcoin Core developers about
MtGox's assertion that their problems are due to a fault of bitcoin, as
opposed to a fault of their own?
The technical analysis preluding this mess, was
on public display since day 1.
I'm not sure what critical information you think secret cabals are
keeping from you.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
Okay, why the everloving FUCK is there not someone on this list with a
@mtgox.com address talking about
code. If you feel wronged as a customer, sue them.
Otherwise, they have no obligation to you.
I believe you are barking up the wrong tree.
Respectfully,
Nick
On February 10, 2014 10:14:02 AM CST, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org
wrote:
Okay, why the everloving FUCK
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:45:03AM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
Name me one single person with commit access to the bitcoin github
repository
who is *independent* of any venture capital or other 'investment
elsewhere.
--
Jameson Lopp
Software Engineer
Bronto Software, Inc
On 02/10/2014 01:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:45:03AM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
Name me one single person with commit
Is there any code that does this? I would like to develop a multicoin-qt
wallet that runs on two blockchains from one binary, and allows trading
using this mechanism between the two chains.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:32:47PM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:44:34PM -0500,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:21:59AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:59:19AM -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Is there any code that does this? I would like to develop a multicoin-qt
wallet that runs on two blockchains from one binary, and allows trading
using this mechanism
instead
of just the guys paying for the attack.
The real killer feature of Bitcoin is that we can learn from it's mistakes
(and bitcoin can learn from the copycatcoins), instead of one-size-fits
all fiat.
--
Troy
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer
.
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash
far off-topic for this mailing list.
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
You can make the same argument against Bitcoin itself you know...
A Bitmessage-like network would be trivial to front-run via a sybil
attack. It's the fundemental problem
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:50:14PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
Such hand-wavy, data-free logic is precisely why community
coordination is preferred to random apps making random decisions in
this manner.
That ship
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes
plenty of time to evaluate
the market risk they face from the 40 byte limit, and put some pressure to
implement some of the alternatives Todd proposes.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho
managers with PGP instead of pre-
compromised X.509 nonsense. https://wiki.debian.org/SecureApt
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:08:36AM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:47:02AM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
There's been a lot of recent hoopla over proof-of-publication, with the
OP_RETURN data length getting
. But not here.
On 03/23/2014 04:17 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
I find it very irresponsible for Bitcoiners to on one hand extol the virtues
of distributed systems and then in the same message claim any discussion
about alternate chains as 'off-topic'.
If bitcoin-core is for *distributed systems
-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind
/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:40:40PM +, Ricardo Filipe wrote:
2014-03-25 13:49 GMT+00:00 Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:45:00AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Bitcoin doesn't scale. There's a
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 01:57:14PM -0700, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
On 03/24/2014 01:34 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
I'm here because I want to sell corn for bitcoin, and I believe it will be
more profitable for me to do that with a bitcoin-blockchain-based system
in which I have
on this list at mere thought
of such heresy.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick
me here, it's because I found a better
mailing list, or a got a contract to develop and ECDSA cracker, in
which case you probably won't hear from me again until I have a talk
at DEFCON showing it off.
-- Troy Benjegerdes
.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy a hacker
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy a hacker who makes money
, test and document PoS, while exploring its vulnerabilities and
fixing them in a transparent fashion.
Thanks for taking a bit of your time to read this message.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer
sense?
You've got to deal with politics, one way or another.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 11:45:44PM +, Luke Dashjr wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 11:02:21 PM Pedro Worcel wrote:
Hi there,
I was wondering if you guys have come across this article:
http://www.wired.com/2014/08/isp-bitcoin-theft/
The TL;DR is that somebody is abusing the
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
AFAIK the only protection is SSL + certificate validation on client side.
However certificate revocation and updates in miners are pain in the ass,
that's why majority of pools (mine including) don't want to play with
that...
.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:24:33AM +0200, Wladimir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
If bitcoin wants to become irrelevant, then by all means, continue to
depend on github and all the unknown attack surface it exposes.
Those of us that do
.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy a hacker who makes
sense.
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink
/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:32:15AM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 01:17:01AM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
This is why I clone git to mercurial, which is generally designed around the
assumption that history is immutable. You can't rewrite blockchain history,
and we
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 04:50:30PM +, Justus Ranvier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/23/2014 04:17 PM, xor wrote:
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 07:40:39 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
Encryption is of little value if you may deduce the same
information by observing
Thank you Jeff.
Having looked at a lot of linux code, and now a lot of bitcoin code, the
biggest long-term systemic risk I see is that Bitcoin has is the lack of
code janitors.
The problem is that janitoring was *disruptive* for non-x86 linux architectures
when it first got going, and it's
/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soulgrid.coop
Never pick a fight
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:27:22AM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Alex Mizrahi alex.mizr...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents?
Since RPC interface does not scale to serve a multi user service.
In
@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' ho...@hozed.org
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul
Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Adam Gibson wrote:
On 02/15/2015 11:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Most money/payment systems include some method to reverse or undo
payments made in error. In these systems, the longer settlement
51 matches
Mail list logo
