Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Having the Mesa 3d libs installed will break hardware 3D-rendering
always - whether it be DRI-based, NVIDIA drivers, or ATI's FireGL
drivers. People will be limited to software 3d rendering.
Thanks Jeremy. I can confirm that with the mesa
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Having the Mesa 3d libs installed will break hardware 3D-rendering
always - whether it be DRI-based, NVIDIA drivers, or ATI's FireGL
drivers. People will be limited to software 3d rendering.
Thanks Jeremy. I can confirm that with
El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 01:52, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
You are suggesting dropping the command. Is that something that has
to be done for all or can we just do that as time allows?
Dropping the command and adding literal in files creation command.
Again, this looks like a huge task.
El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 01:11, Randy McMurchy escribió:
Doesn't matter to me. My question is, why do you want to go through
all this work, for something that won't be seen by anyone after the
book is rendered in either PDF or HTML or otherwise? It just seems
like you're going to an
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I figured out what happened. I installed the Nvidia binary drivers. It
overwrote:
Is it a good idea to add manual installation of those NVidia drivers (and
possibly fglrx, I can provide instructions) to the book, so that future
readers don't step onto this problem?
--
Randy McMurchy wrote:
In my opinion, the LessTif package belongs in the X Window Manager
section of the book, and not the X Libraries section. LessTif includes
the mwm Motif compatible window manager. Surely, we should move the
instructions, right?
What is Lesstif?
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 04/17/05 10:42 CST:
The only thing I have at the moment that uses Lesstif is `xpdf', and
that certainly doesn't care about the window manager portion of Lesstif :-)
Well, to counter this, I'll say that at the moment on a system I
am building up, I have the
El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 18:10, Randy McMurchy escribió:
I really don't have a preference on where the package is located in
the book, however. I just wanted to throw this out, in case there
were others that were thinking the same thing. I'll defer to your
opinion and the fact that it
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 04/17/05 11:21 CST:
Why not to add a mwm page in window managers like we already do in graphipcal
browsers for Konqueror or in the mail/news clients pages for Kmail/Knode?
Excellent suggestion, Manuel. Something like, The LessTif package
includes a Motif
Matthew Burgess wrote:
If you've any problems with the approach above, let me know.
No. Your approach seems great. We don't get dunned with gcc-4.0 issues
and both lfs and blfs get appropriate input. Thanks for the heads up.
-- Bruce
--
Matthew Burgess wrote:
The primary objectives have been to develop the widget code of the
LessTif Toolkit. Intermittently, the window manager (mwm) and the
combination of UIL compiler and libMrm are being worked on.
I agree with Matt. In this case the primary purpose of the package is
as a
I'm trying to install libgnomeprint-2.8.0.1. As a prereq for gnumeric.
I have not installed gnome. The instructions say:
./configure --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0` \
--sysconfdir=/etc/gnome --disable-gtk-doc
But ORBit-2.0 is not listed as a dependency. When I execute:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Actually, the instructions say that libgnomeprintui, not libgnomeprint
is the dependency.
Yes but libgnomeprintui has a required dependency of libgnomeprint.
There is a huge difference here. Much of GNOME will need to be
installed to satisfy the dependency.
Perhaps.
Randy McMurchy wrote:
it probably doesn't need an immediate fix.
Agreed.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/17/05 17:58 CST:
Yes but libgnomeprintui has a required dependency of libgnomeprint.
I've been thinking about this, and perhaps the easiest thing to
do is just substitute then for the , in the list of depends.
Then, folks would install them in the required
DJ Lucas wrote:
Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem
still exists.
Just checking back, but no change necessary to db except that passing
LIBSO_LIBS and LIBXSO_LIBS to make is no longer necessary.
-- DJ Lucas
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
