On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my understanding that Babel is FOSS. If this is incorrect,
please be sure to let me know.
No, it is not. The original Babel (which you used) does not have any
sort of open source license. It's free to distribute, but was blocked
There is no indication in the babel-1.6 source tree that I could find
to indicate that it is not FOSS. It looks like openbabel-2.1.1 is in
the package tree, and it would be worth checking out I take it. In
fact, thank you for the excellent suggestions!
Regards,
On 25 Aug, Geoffrey Hutchison
On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no indication in the babel-1.6 source tree that I could find
to indicate that it is not FOSS.
If you take a look at any source file:
This file is part of the Babel Program
Copyright (C) 1992-96 W. Patrick Walters and Matthew T.
On 25 Aug, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no indication in the babel-1.6 source tree that I could find
to indicate that it is not FOSS.
If you take a look at any source file:
This file is part of the Babel Program
Copyright (C)
