Hi,
to sum things up as I have an impression they are diesred:
- We would nominate Thorsten as election officer (who then would step
back as MC deputy),
- and we would like to elect 5 members and 2 deputies in the new MC,
- and we don't want to freeze membership applications.
Please, all BoD
Em 01-11-2011 11:26, Florian Effenberger escreveu:
Hi,
to sum things up as I have an impression they are diesred:
- We would nominate Thorsten as election officer (who then would step
back as MC deputy),
+1
- and we would like to elect 5 members and 2 deputies in the new MC,
+1
-
Florian Effenberger wrote:
- and we would like to elect 5 members and 2 deputies in the new MC,
+1
- and we don't want to freeze membership applications.
+1 (going with the flow :))
take the existing MC (needing a deputy for Thorsten,
since he's in the BoD already) and have a gentlemen's
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 14:26 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
- We would nominate Thorsten as election officer (who then would step
back as MC deputy),
+1
- and we would like to elect 5 members and 2 deputies in the new MC,
+1
- and we don't want to freeze membership applications.
+1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
I have assumed that Thorsten has not stepped down from MC or something.
Whatever he was stepping down from was in order for him to be able to do some
work that he is being blocked from doing anyway right? So
/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Preparing elections for the membership
committee
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Tuesday, 1 November, 2011, 15:16
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom
Florian Effenberger wrote:
With the caveat that Thorsten must resign as MC-deputy, since one
cannot be BoD and MC member at once.
good point, indeed. Thorsten, in case you get voted as election
officer, would you step back from your MC deputy role?
Hi Florian, all,
yes indeed, as a board
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 13:28 -0200, David Emmerich Jourdain wrote:
- In a nutshell, this means: We either can decide to nominate the current
MC as the first MC and have a gentlemen's agreement that they step back
as soon as the foundation is in place, leading to new elections about 45
days
Hello,
Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-10-31 11:41:
a) it -may- allow us to setup the foundation more quickly, at
least we are not blocking on a fairly artificial timeline
I think if so, it just would delay two weeks, IMHO noncritical after
this amount of time.
b)
Hi,
2011/10/30 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Hello,
André Schnabel wrote on 2011-10-26 21:48:
as we have discussed previously, the paragraphs about the membership
committee in the current statutes draft differ in some points from what we
have in the bylaws. I hope, I
Hi,
David Emmerich Jourdain wrote on 2011-10-30 16:28:
IMHO, I don't see why can we not adopt this option. The current MC proved
that was (and is) impartial and deeply focused on meritocracy, essential
factors for an MC.
For me, the current MC proved that's fully deserving of this gentlemen's
Hi,
Am 30.10.2011 17:09, schrieb Norbert Thiebaud:
Maybe we can do with the current MC as 'initially designated' for the
first 6 month of the foundation and organize a MC election then, since
it would be a good idea to have BoD election and MC election somewhat
separated to avoid
Hi,
2011/10/30 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 30.10.2011 17:09, schrieb Norbert Thiebaud:
Maybe we can do with the current MC as 'initially designated' for the
first 6 month of the foundation and organize a MC election then, since
it would be a good idea to have BoD election
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
'Freezing' the membership does not necessarily means stop processing
applications, but just that the list of eligible member for the
election is 'frozen' at that date.
The list of member can still grow, but people that get membershp after
the freeze date are not
2011/10/26 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
We had some discussion, if we should freeze again the membership process.
BoD should decide on that (I personally would not like to have again some
weeks where we do not accept new members, at the other hand it might be easy
to challenge the
15 matches
Mail list logo
