On Sep 14, 2006, at 9:21 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gibson Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because the USA may be the target of nuclear terrorism. OTOH,
nuclear terrorists might explode a bomb anywhere they can, just
to show they have it.
OK.
How does this make any
JDG said:
Given the existence of universal truth, I don't see how the number n
of people who fail to recognize and accept that universal truth is at
all relevant. After all, that universal truth is, by definition,
universally true.
Yes, indeed. But Dan was specifically talking about
JDG said:
Additionally, if my memory serves me correctly, Egypt went on to
become
one of the most important and productive provinces in the Roman
Empire.
Thus, it hardly seems to have been depleted.
In fact, Egypt was so productive that there were people who argued
against its
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, J.D. Giorgis wrote:
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates based on political ideology
in the US:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gibson Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That you can phrase the question as should a defense company be making
sub-standard profits - whatever that means in this realm - is amazing
to read. If you have any direct experience I'd like to hear about it.
They've always
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if ABC had decided to air Farenheit 9/11 this weekend instead
would
you all agree or disagree that such an action would be a bald-faced
attempt to slander Republicans and revise history right before
Americans
vote in a
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why the Democrats will always lose: we lack the will to
feed
poisonous lies to children to achieve our ends.
Uh huh.
- It tells students that the United States went to war in Iraq
because
of weapons of mass
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an impressive display of agility, educational publisher Scholastic
has cancelled their planned distribution of study guides to accompany
the Path to 9/11 miniseries and replaced them with a Media Literacy
Discussion Guide that
Oh, that sucks!
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Bush, Buchanan, and Hoover
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:02:36 -0500
At 10:54 PM Thursday
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], John W Redelfs jredelfs@ wrote:
People extol the virtues of abortion
Not *all* people, Maru.
Not anybody that I know of. At best, it is a triage decision.
Wow. Finally a view that really
JDG wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
A while ago, somebody said This country isn't at war, only our
military is at war. I think that was profound. It bugs the heck
out of me, to put it mildly, that our leaders ask no one except the
troops to make sacrifices for the current wars.
What is huge
On 15/09/2006, at 3:29 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], John W Redelfs jredelfs@ wrote:
People extol the virtues of abortion
Not *all* people, Maru.
Not anybody that I know of. At best, it is a triage
On 9/14/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is huge profits? Is there some level of profits for these
companies that you would accept as not being huge? Particularly
after accounting for the fact that companies which provide services to
the military naturally find their services to
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anybody that I know of. At best, it is a triage decision.
Wow. Finally a view that really gets to the heart of it. Thanks, Nick.
I may use that in the future.
Too bad its not true.
Consider the website of this abortion provider - other
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate historical docu-drama? That is as much
like taking on controversial issues as going on a holiday cruise is
like
At 08:39 AM Friday 9/15/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
I don't think there is an economic formula in existence that justifies
making money in a cause for which people are giving their very lives.
And yet for most of the world's history that has been a very real
part of the economic system. It
On 9/15/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I am not mentioning this to make light of your argument about the
current war, but just to point out that in many other cases we accept
a human cost as necessary part of the cost of getting a job done.)
Accepting it and quantifying it are
JDG wrote:
Given everything that Herbert Hoover accomplished with his live,
I'm very surprised to see you compare Bush to Hoover
I know nothing about Hoover. Was he also an strategical genius
like Bush?
Alberto Monteiro
___
On Sep 15, 2006, at 4:56 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gibson Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That you can phrase the question as should a defense company be making
sub-standard profits - whatever that means in this realm - is amazing
to read. If you have any direct
Hoover had a far better strategic brain than Bush. Unfortunately, that's not
hard. Let's rephrase that:
Hoover did have a strategic brain. He was just operating on the wrong theory
under unprecedented circumstances, and a lot of startegists do not respond
quickly to things. Or why he was
On Sep 15, 2006, at 5:19 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an impressive display of agility, educational publisher Scholastic
has cancelled their planned distribution of study guides to accompany
the Path to 9/11 miniseries and replaced them
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate historical docu-drama? That is as much
like
On 15 Sep 2006 at 6:39, Nick Arnett wrote:
I hope and pray that the vast majority of people still believe that
making profits from death and destruction is wrong, that every red
cent is tainted with the blood of the fallen, even if it can be
justified by economics.
And there are people out
One of the thoughts I've had repeatedly since 9/11 is about the
phenomenon that just about anything can be accepted if it's done by
guys on your own side. The unprecedented power that George W Bush
is trying to take into the White House is one of those. Republicans
say it is great; Democrats say
On Sep 15, 2006, at 5:15 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why the Democrats will always lose: we lack the will
to feed poisonous lies to children to achieve our ends.
Uh huh.
- It tells students that the United States went to
On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:15 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 14/09/2006, at 7:26 PM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Hey, there was a lot of mass and volume to be those structures and it
is little wonder some of it spread out. The point we are all
scratching our heads over is how they didn't topple off to
On 15/09/2006, at 11:52 PM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Charlie,
You've turned the whole thing in it's head. Your asking me to
prove support for your position that the official story, du jour,
holds true.
No, I'm asking you for evidence to support your claim that it doesn't.
The point we
At 12:10 PM Friday 9/15/2006, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 15, 2006, at 4:30 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, J.D. Giorgis wrote:
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates
On Sep 15, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
I Am A Thoughtful Voter, You Are A Mindless Idiot Maru
I am both, depending on the election, to be honest. I'm taking
this one a little more seriously. The primaries almost got by
me without my putting a lot of thought into them, so I was
On Sep 15, 2006, at 7:50 AM, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
Bush's strategic ability can be measured in micrometers IMO.
Yeah, but have you measured his strategery? It's off the charts!
--
Warren Ockrassa
Blog | http://indigestible.nightwares.com/
Books | http://books.nightwares.com/
Web |
Sorry Charlie,
I have lost the references I have to the side-toppled buildings I speak
of, but will relay them as they turn up. Some of the same ones
appeared in the threads when we first dove into this some months ago,
if that helps.
Ok, let's get into the science a bit more.
This event
- Original Message -
From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: Bush, Buchanan, and Hoover
On Sep 15, 2006, at 7:50 AM, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
Bush's strategic ability can be measured in
John Gibson wrote:
I understand your acceptance.
Interesting that your friend is well-placed and
perhaps well-heeled -
this actually fits a premise I'll go into later about
people who know
where their bread gets buttered. I'd really like to
know just how
these studies were funded,
34 matches
Mail list logo
