At 09:00 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:37 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Dave Land wrote:
Gadzooks, you hit a nerve.
Now, I have to stop writing this email and get some work done for a
12:00 meeting.
I hope it is not significant in that context that the
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 09:00 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:37 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Dave Land wrote:
Gadzooks, you hit a nerve.
Now, I have to stop writing this email and get some work done for a
12:00 meeting.
I hope it is not significant
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:00 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:37 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Dave Land wrote:
Gadzooks, you hit a nerve.
Now, I have to stop writing this email and get some work done for a
12:00 meeting.
I hope it
On 5/4/06, Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the books are aimed at boys. Both the AS and the ADD books. It
seems that AS presents itself differently in girls so that makes it
very difficult to pick good books.
I think you may be mistaken about this. Many of the ADD books are
Thanks!
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Blog entry with interesting comment
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 07:00:19 -0700
On 5/4/06, Horn, John
At 08:39 AM Friday 5/5/2006, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
Prayers for the ADD: Oh, God, grant me focus and ... oh, look, a bird!
Prayers for the OCD: Oh, God, help me to relax - starting precisely
at 8:01 Monday morning as soon as I get to my desk and have my coat
off but before I turn on my computer
I'm combining posts here-
PAT MATHEWS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippage
3) Again in my observation, Aspies come in roughly
two flavors: the
organized, single-focused, linear mind; and the
absent-minded
professor/free-spirited idea mill. Inattentive ADD
goes with the latter. If
you
On Behalf Of Nick Arnett
All the books are aimed at boys. Both the AS and the ADD
books. It
seems that AS presents itself differently in girls so that makes
it
very difficult to pick good books.
I think you may be mistaken about this. Many of the ADD
books are written by women,
Ok, here are a few sites for those curious:
http://www.personalitypathways.com/MBTI_intro.html
http://www.personalitypathways.com/type_inventory.html
And for the skeptical (I have only skimmed this, as
it's time to head out):
http://skepdic.com/myersb.html
I do have a problem with this site's
At any rate, you still test out Idealist, and in many ways that's the most
important part because it's the central theme of your life.
Pat, INTP but unwilling to make up my mind oh, look, a bird! BAD
kitties!
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, here are a few sites for those curious:
And for the skeptical (I have only skimmed this, as
it's time to head out):
http://skepdic.com/myersb.html
MBTI is psuedo-science at its finest.
___
On May 5, 2006, at 11:52 AM, The Fool wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, here are a few sites for those curious:
And for the skeptical (I have only skimmed this, as
it's time to head out):
http://skepdic.com/myersb.html
MBTI is psuedo-science at its finest.
OK. You're
On May 5, 2006, at 11:39 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
OTOH, I'm split between the J and P, which makes me
feel a little better, not desiring to be known as
judgemental...even though in many ways, I am.
Some are confused by the language of MBTI, and find one or the other
terms for each of the
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 5, 2006, at 11:52 AM, The Fool wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, here are a few sites for those curious:
And for the skeptical (I have only skimmed this, as
it's time to head out):
http://skepdic.com/myersb.html
MBTI
On May 5, 2006, at 1:27 PM, The Fool wrote:
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 5, 2006, at 11:52 AM, The Fool wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, here are a few sites for those curious:
And for the skeptical (I have only skimmed this, as
it's time to head out):
Dave Land wrote:
And, of course, each is a spectrum:
Because they are spectra there are a number of encoding schemes out
there to try to disambiguate those that move or are near the lines, and
some psychologists will tell you the categorizations are meaningless
without the full test and
On May 5, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
Dave Land wrote:
And, of course, each is a spectrum:
Because they are spectra there are a number of encoding schemes out
there to try to disambiguate those that move or are near the lines,
and some psychologists will tell you the
On 5/5/06, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's no different than ennenagrams and other bullsh!t that sounds good
to the ignorant and uninformed.
So what do you think of this bit of logic from the skeptics' site:
However, his typology seems to imply that science is just a point of view
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Arnett
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:21 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Myers-Briggs
On 5/5/06, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a glaring logical error. The idea that
On 06/05/2006, at 1:53 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
stuff
Given that I so often disagree with Dan on many things, I think it
only fair to chip in that I was lurking on this one too, and he has
basically said what I would've...
:)
So, where are we wrong this time?
Charlie
20 matches
Mail list logo
