Charlie Bell wrote:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:02 AM, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
And in the UK (lost the attribution) a boy of 13 was accused of
statuatory rape for having consensual sex with a girl of 11-going- on-12.
But in the UK the age of consent is 16. So if you're under 16, you
can't give
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:20 AM, Julia Thompson wrote:
The laws in the US vary from state to state. Texas does something
fairly reasonable -- I've forgotten the age of consent, but if one
person is on one side and the other is on the other side, if the
difference in ages is a certain
Charlie Bell wrote:
shame some other states seem to be wanting to go back to the century
before last in terms of contraception and abortion.
Hey, we have to keep our children from learning that filthy, dirty sex
can actually be fun! How do you expect to do that if you don't punish
them with
Charlie Bell wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Hey, we have to keep our children from learning that filthy, dirty
sex can actually be fun! How do you expect to do that if you don't
punish them with ignorance and unwanted pregnancies?
In the dark, in the bedroom, in the missionary position only Maru
Julia Thompson wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:02 AM, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
And in the UK (lost the attribution) a boy of 13 was accused of
statuatory rape for having consensual sex with a girl of 11-going-
on-12.
But in the UK the age of consent is 16. So if you're under
Charlie Bell wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:51 AM, Jim Sharkey wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
shame some other states seem to be wanting to go back to the
century
before last in terms of contraception and abortion.
Hey, we have to keep our children from learning that filthy, dirty
sex can
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:51 AM, Jim Sharkey wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
shame some other states seem to be wanting to go back to the
century
before last in terms of contraception and abortion.
Hey, we have to keep our
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
The laws in the US vary from state to state. Texas does something
fairly reasonable -- I've forgotten the age of consent, but if one
person is on one side and the other is on the other side, if the
difference in ages is a certain margin or less
At 09:04 PM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
The laws in the US vary from state to state. Texas does something
fairly reasonable -- I've forgotten the age of consent, but if one
person is on one side and the other is on the other side,
http://smh.com.au/news/National/Labor-will-make-ISPs-block-net-porn/20
06/03/21/114270305.html
Labor's plan to protect children from online pornography and graphic
violence has been backed by family groups, but dismissed by the
government and internet industry.
Opposition Leader Kim Beazley
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://smh.com.au/news/National/Labor-will-make-ISPs-block-net-porn/20
06/03/21/114270305.html
Labor's plan to protect children from online pornography and graphic
violence has been backed by family groups, but dismissed by the
government and internet
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:02 AM, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
And in the UK (lost the attribution) a boy of 13 was accused of
statuatory rape for having consensual sex with a girl of 11-going-
on-12.
But in the UK the age of consent is 16. So if you're under 16, you
can't give consent legally. So
12 matches
Mail list logo
