On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 03:32 am, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: The Greatest Story Ever Sold
In a message dated 9/24/03 10:04:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
William T Goodall wrote:
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 03:32 am, Dan Minette wrote:
Tobit, one of the histories. It was part of the Septuagint, and was
considered part of the cannon at the time of Jesus. Well, not by the
Sagacees (sp) Or, Macabees would be another history that
Dan Minette wrote:
The term observant Jews use is Tanakh, which is an acronym of
Torah, Nevi'im (Prophets), and Ketuvim (writings). And they were
all written in Hebrew
before being translated into Greek and then back into Hebrew.
OK, lets look at Tobit, for example. What evidence exists
It makes sense: the Old Testiment was anti-Semetic. If you want to
make a movie about, say, the latter days of the Northern Kingdom,
and if you want to base it in the Bible, it will be a _very_ anti-semetic
movie, showing israelites with all kinds of sins.
How is the Old Testament (a term
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It makes sense: the Old Testiment was anti-Semetic. If you want to
make a movie about, say, the latter days of the Northern Kingdom,
and if you want to base it in the Bible, it will be a _very_
anti-semetic
movie, showing israelites with all kinds of sins.
Tom Beck wrote:
It makes sense: the Old Testiment was anti-Semetic. If you want to
make a movie about, say, the latter days of the Northern Kingdom,
and if you want to base it in the Bible, it will be a _very_ anti-semetic
movie, showing israelites with all kinds of sins.
How is the Old
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: The Greatest Story Ever Sold
How is the Old Testament (a term Jews never use) anti-Semitic?
I realize that the Old Testament is a Christian term
I realize that the Old Testament is a Christian term, and that the Hebrew
Scriptures are the more common used term when these scriptures are
discussed in forums that include people of many beliefs. However, the
professor who taught the Persian and Hellenistic Judaism seminar I took
pointed
Turn to any random passage and it will very likely be 'you people are
evil and deserve to be killed' paraphrased.
For one thing, those are translations. And not necessarily good ones. (The
King James Bible may be beautiful English, but it is not a very good translation
of the Hebrew Bible.)
The term observant Jews use is Tanakh, which is an acronym of Torah,
Nevi'im (Prophets), and Ketuvim (writings). And they were all written in
Hebrew
before being translated into Greek and then back into Hebrew.
OK, lets look at Tobit, for example. What evidence exists that it was
first written
In a message dated 9/24/03 10:04:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, lets look at Tobit, for example. What evidence exists that it was
first written in Hebrew?
Sorry, at what?
Tom Beck
www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org
I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: The Greatest Story Ever Sold
In a message dated 9/24/03 10:04:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
OK, lets look at Tobit, for example. What evidence exists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/24/03 10:04:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, lets look at Tobit, for example. What evidence exists that it was
first written in Hebrew?
Sorry, at what?
Tobit.
That doesn't fall under Old Testament, strictly speaking -- it's one
of
The Fool quoted:
I never called the movie anti-Semitic (...)
Which is stupid, because the Gospels _are_ anti-Semitic, and
a movie that pretends to be faithful to them [AFAIK, if Gibson
wants to do it in Aramaic, he has this intention] should be
anti-Semitic.It's like making a movie about
- Original Message -
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: The Greatest Story Ever Sold
The Fool quoted:
I never called the movie anti-Semitic (...)
Which is stupid, because
--- Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Fool quoted:
I never called the movie anti-Semitic (...)
Which is stupid, because the Gospels _are_ anti-Semitic, and
a movie that pretends to be faithful to them [AFAIK, if Gibson
wants to do it in Aramaic, he has this intention] should
In a message dated 9/22/2003 9:52:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The Fool quoted:
I never called the movie anti-Semitic (...)
Which is stupid, because the Gospels _are_ anti-Semitic, and
a movie that pretends to be faithful to them [AFAIK, if Gibson
wants to
Jan Coffey wrote:
If fact I am supprised that there are not more italians
complaining about Gibbsons movie.
Probably because italians don't consider themselves romans -
they are as roman-germanic hybrids as any other western
europeans [except portuguese, that are half to 1/4 jews :-)]
Dan Minette wrote:
1) The criticism of the Jewish leaders and of the croud during the passion
needs to be understood in terms of the context: Jerusalem, you killer of
prophets. If this understanding is anti-Semetic, then much of the Old
Testiment was anti-Semetic...which makes no sense.
It
In a message dated 9/22/2003 9:52:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The Fool quoted:
I never called the movie anti-Semitic (...)
Which is stupid, because the Gospels _are_ anti-Semitic, and
a movie that pretends to be faithful to them [AFAIK, if Gibson
wants to
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/21/arts/21RICH.html?ex=1064721600en=7126a
37552fcf278ei=5062
FRANK RICH The Greatest Story Ever Sold
Then Gibson expressed his feelings about Rich. I want to kill him, he
said. I want his intestines on a stick. . . . I want to kill his dog.
The New Yorker, Sept
21 matches
Mail list logo
