Hi Chet,
I didn't realize until much later that we were corresponding off-list
when I sent you the OS/2 patch. I'm just following up to make sure you
didn't miss it. I actually had expected you to tell me to fix some
things with it and re-submit, so I was waiting to hear back before
doing any
style
before you want to see it?
posting patches would probably be useful to the next random person who wants
bash running on OS/2, but if you want to get included, writing proper patches
against the latest release+patchset is the way to go.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
complete,
or would you rather I had Bash 3.2 working 100% with perfect style
before you want to see it?
posting patches would probably be useful to the next random person who wants
bash running on OS/2, but if you want to get included, writing proper patches
against the latest release
On Friday 23 May 2008, Brendan Oakley wrote:
I would like to see them included, so the crucial part of my question
is whether it would be proper to submit any incremental patches for
inclusion even while the port itself is, in some ways, incomplete; or
whether I should have everything right
