Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?

Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:40:56AM CET: I wonder what the best idiom for gnulib should be. We probably do not want to require automake CVS just yet. Should it be the one I'm using: TESTS += test-gc$(EXEEXT)

Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?

Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SJ How about simply: SJ tests_PROGRAMS += test-gc [...] SJ Or something, I'm not really sure. I have always found this SJ redundancy a bit disturbing though. I don't think a new syntax is necessary since you can do TESTS =

Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?

Hi Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:40:56AM CET: I wonder what the best idiom for gnulib should be. We probably do not want to require automake CVS just yet. Should it be the one I'm using: TESTS += test-gc$(EXEEXT) check_PROGRAMS += test-gc or should we do

Re: patch for gettext.m4 for better included intl support

Title: Re: patch for gettext.m4 for better included intl support Hello Claudio, Sorry for not answering earlier: on 2006-01-06 I felt that I had to think a bit more about the possible drawbacks of your proposed patch. assuming full autotools and gnulib support, lib/, and lib/Makefile.am