Re: License of module "Perl" seems wrong

2023-02-27 Thread Bruno Haible
On Montag, 27. Februar 2023 21:58:13 CET Reuben Thomas wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 14:05, Bruno Haible wrote: > > > Hi Reuben, > > > > Reuben Thomas wrote: > > > The perl module has a GPL license, but its only file, m4/perl.m4, has an > > > "unlimited" license. > > > > The license of a

Re: Apple LLVM 10 and `__fallthrough__`

2023-02-27 Thread Bruno Haible
Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > > > Wiki suggests __apple_build_version__ >= 1200 > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcode#Xcode_11.0_-_14.x_(since_SwiftUI_framework)_2 > ... > I wish I could directly test it. However, I could confirm that Swift > release 5.3 (Xcode 12) was the first release

Re: License of module "Perl" seems wrong

2023-02-27 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 14:05, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Reuben, > > Reuben Thomas wrote: > > The perl module has a GPL license, but its only file, m4/perl.m4, has an > > "unlimited" license. > > The license of a module, in the module description, cannot be "wrong" since > that's the authoritative

Re: License of module "Perl" seems wrong

2023-02-27 Thread Jim Meyering
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 6:05 AM Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Reuben, > > Reuben Thomas wrote: > > The perl module has a GPL license, but its only file, m4/perl.m4, has an > > "unlimited" license. > > The license of a module, in the module description, cannot be "wrong" since > that's the

Re: Updating in glibc and gnulib

2023-02-27 Thread Florian Weimer
* Bruno Haible: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> Does gnulib still override unconditionally? > > Gnulib does not override , and never did. Thanks for looking into this. gnulib's libc-config.h does this: | #ifndef __attribute_nonnull__ | /* either does not exist, or is too old for Gnulib. |

Re: License of module "Perl" seems wrong

2023-02-27 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Reuben, Reuben Thomas wrote: > The perl module has a GPL license, but its only file, m4/perl.m4, has an > "unlimited" license. The license of a module, in the module description, cannot be "wrong" since that's the authoritative location where the license is noted. I guess your problem is

[PATCH] terminfo, termcap: Fix more spellos in a comment.

2023-02-27 Thread Benno Schulenberg
* lib/tparm.c: Fix misspellings and wording in the main comment. --- ChangeLog | 5 + lib/tparm.c | 8 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 25610ee51b..17bb762072 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@

Re: Apple LLVM 10 and `__fallthrough__`

2023-02-27 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
> > > -# elif (__GNUC__ >= 7) || (__clang_major__ >= 10) > > > +# elif ((__GNUC__ >= 7) \ > > > +|| (defined __apple_build_version__ \ > > > +? __apple_build_version__ >= 1400 \ > > > +: __clang_major__ >= 10)) > > > > > > Wiki suggests __apple_build_version__

Re: 回复: lib/fts.c: return when malloc failed

2023-02-27 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 27/02/2023 11:36, ChuanGang Jiang wrote: I found this by accident and then reproduce it through artificial mem pressure test. And I update the patch as you said. *lib/fts.c:return when malloc failed in function setup_dir() --- lib/fts.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1

回复: lib/fts.c: return when malloc failed

2023-02-27 Thread ChuanGang Jiang
I found this by accident and then reproduce it through artificial mem pressure test. And I update the patch as you said. *lib/fts.c:return when malloc failed in function setup_dir() --- lib/fts.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/fts.c b/lib/fts.c

License of module "Perl" seems wrong

2023-02-27 Thread Reuben Thomas
The perl module has a GPL license, but its only file, m4/perl.m4, has an "unlimited" license. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org

Re: Take account of splitting option in gendocs.sh

2023-02-27 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 09:52:08PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Gavin Smith wrote: > > I notice that this script also still supports texi2html, which is no > > longer developed. I could produce a patch to remove this support if > > it was very likely that nobody was relying on it. > > A web