Hi,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Wed 04 Aug 2010 19:37:18 +0200, a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sat 24 Jul 2010 04:08:51 +0200, a écrit :
- A
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:24:24PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Besides: Did something change from your usability report last year?
Not fundamentally. Some new breakage -- gv for example has been broken
for a while (epdfview works though, so not a real problem); or some
breakage in
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Wed 04 Aug 2010 19:37:18 +0200, a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sat 24 Jul 2010 04:08:51 +0200, a écrit :
- A full-featured high-resolution console (probably
framebuffer-based)
For
On Thursday 12 August 2010 08:10:43 olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
However,
I still refuse to run a graphics-centric environment, just to
do my
text-centric work on top of it. It makes no sense. I want a
text-centric
environment, with graphics capabilities as on optional
addition; not the
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:17:34AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
What about console on X? Would that suffice for your needs?
Oh, sorry, forgot to answer that question.
No, it wouldn't suffice. If I was content with X, why would I ever want
to port KGI?...
Admittedly, X would
On Wednesday 04 August 2010 19:25:26 olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
*
Hurd related:
- Boot on laptop ;)
- Non-jerky X
-
Switching between console and X
- A full-featured high-resolution
console (doesn't good X suffice?)
- WLAN
- Ported Firefox
- Flash
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 14:13:44 Ivan Shmakov wrote:
For those
wishing for a better experience, a Linux kernel module
version of
Mach could be developed at some time later.
That would be quite neat.
Then adding Hurd to other distributions would be easy, too.
Then,
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am I right in reading your mail, that the real show stoppers for a pure Hurd
environment for you are
* Hurd related:
- Boot on laptop ;)
- Non-jerky X
- Switching between console and X
- A
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:13:44PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net writes:
However, I have been planning to get an extra router box for quite
some time now -- so that is really only a temporary consideration.
(Holding me back so far is the excessive cost of
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sat 24 Jul 2010 04:08:51 +0200, a écrit :
- A full-featured high-resolution console (probably
framebuffer-based)
For that, just a framebuffer would be enough, then bogl can be used.
I was
Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org writes:
Ivan Shmakov, le Wed 28 Jul 2010 19:13:44 +0700, a écrit :
- PPPoE/routing/NAT/packet filtering.
I'd much appreciate IPv6 support, and there will be virtually no
need for NAT for me then.
AIUI, IPv6 is already supported.
Indeed.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:18:32PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org writes:
Ivan Shmakov, le Wed 28 Jul 2010 19:13:44 +0700, a écrit :
- PPPoE/routing/NAT/packet filtering.
I'd much appreciate IPv6 support, and there will be virtually no
need for
On Saturday 24 July 2010 04:08:51 olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Not sure why you want to exclude me here :-)
That was just because you already said what’s missing. But your list here is
much more useful, so the excluding was clearly wrong :)
Am I right in reading your mail, that the real
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 08:41:49AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
This message goes to all who (different from Olaf aka antrik) don???t
yet use the Hurd for their day-to-day tasks (if you do, please write
anyway that it fullfills your (basic?) needs).
What is currently missing in
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sat 24 Jul 2010 04:08:51 +0200, a écrit :
- A full-featured high-resolution console (probably framebuffer-based)
For that, just a framebuffer would be enough, then bogl can be used.
- Firefox (or perhaps some other full-featured browser)
We should be close to this,
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net writes:
[…]
For my desktop:
- PPPoE/routing/NAT/packet filtering.
I'd much appreciate IPv6 support, and there will be virtually no
need for NAT for me then.
(There's an obvious interest in P2P in the free software
community, and
Ivan Shmakov, le Wed 28 Jul 2010 19:13:44 +0700, a écrit :
- PPPoE/routing/NAT/packet filtering.
I'd much appreciate IPv6 support, and there will be virtually no
need for NAT for me then.
AIUI, IPv6 is already supported.
• message passing on top of Linux:
–
On 15/07/10 17:54, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Wed 14 Jul 2010 21:13:11 +0200, a écrit :
- Support for modern processors (Intel Core 2 Duo, I've heard anything newer
than Pentium III may not work)
I'd actually say that anything may not work, be it newer than Pentium
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Wed 14 Jul 2010 21:13:11 +0200, a écrit :
- Support for modern processors (Intel Core 2 Duo, I've heard anything newer
than Pentium III may not work)
I'd actually say that anything may not work, be it newer than Pentium
III or not. If there's an issue, people should
On 12/07/10 08:41, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
What is currently missing in the Hurd distibutions to make it fullfill your
basic needs for your day-to-day work or hobby? Ideally on real hardware,
alternatively in qemu/virtualbox/XEN/…
I'd first need to (try to) install it on my desktop
Sorry for chiming in here, maybe this is a shot in the dark. Grub has
made some progress with USB interfaces by Ales Nesrsta, see e.g.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-07/msg00079.html
Can this (GNU) work be reusable for Hurd?
Svante Signell
GNU and Hurd supporter
This reply does not seem to have made it to bug-hurd. Maybe not so
usable to get support for USB in Hurd, but anyway.
Forwarded Message
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com
Reply-to: The development of GNU GRUB grub-de...@gnu.org
To: grub-de...@gnu.org
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 08:41:49AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
What is missing for you?
Sound support, wireless, and PPPoE. I could probably factor out these
to a seperate router/sound box but at that point I might as well just
run Hurd in in kvm and use the host as the support box,
On 12/07/10 07:41, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
What is currently missing in the Hurd distibutions to make it fullfill your
basic needs for your day-to-day work or hobby? Ideally on real hardware,
alternatively in qemu/virtualbox/XEN/…
In order of importance:
-USB (can't do backups/access my
One of my aims in starting Arch Hurd was to end up with a system which
could run on my server, maybe also my netbook. There are only a few
things (alas, big things) before I can do that. In order of importance:
Server:
* USB
* Sound
* SATA
Netbook:
* SATA
* USB
* Sound
* Wireless
25 matches
Mail list logo
