Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Hi all, Thanks for all your replies. David Kastrup wrote > You don't _need_ to override the whole list. You could just override > single properties from it. You are of course right, David, I can just use: \override Stem.details.lengths = #'(3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5.0 6.0) Thanks for the tip.

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Torsten Hämmerle writes: > Any automatic interference (even if it's only in a special case like for > flat-flag-style) could lead to unpredictable results and the user would lose > part of the freedom and flexibility to set any desired value by modifying > the details

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Gilberto Agostinho wrote > Wouldn't it be possible to add a conditional to check for those? If an > user > uses flat-flag then they certainly would also prefer these stem length > settings that you posted. Having this automatized would be great. Hmmm, At first glance, that seems to be a good

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Gilberto Agostinho wrote > I noticed that the length of the stems in beamed > notes changed considerably after I used your suggestion below, they are > now > much taller than before: Hi Gilberto, Oh, bummer, I had forgotten to set some values back to default after playing around with them...

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Hi Torsten, Sorry to disturb you but I noticed that the length of the stems in beamed notes changed considerably after I used your suggestion below, they are now much taller than before: Torsten Hämmerle wrote > The modified Stem details are: > > \override Stem.details = #'((lengths 3.5 3.5

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Hi Torsten, Thanks a lot for your message and apologies for my late reply, for some reason I did not receive a notification that someone had replied to my post. Also, thank you very much for the modified Stem details, that indeed does the trick. I will add that to all my scores. > There is no

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Hi Torsten, Thanks a lot for your message and apologies for my late reply, for some reason I did not receive a notification that someone had replied to my post. Also, thank you very much for the modified Stem details, that indeed does the trick. I will add that to all my scores. Torsten

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

Gilberto Agostinho wrote > I noticed that some of the 32nd-note flags in the flat-flag style seem to > have a layout problem. The flat flags should always match the staff lines > (just like beams do), but in a few cases they are located in between the > staff lines, which looks quite bad. See the