Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-Medium
Comment #4 on issue 1553 by percival.music.ca: Staff stretching problem in
2.13.50+
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553
Ok, good argument.
___
bug-lilypond mailing
It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer
stretching the lines, if one line was forced to be stretched.
---
\version 2.13.51
\score {\relative c'' {
c1 c \break
d1 d d d d d d d
} }
\markup hello
[...]
I think this is a bug/regression.
Probably not a bug.
Keith,
-Original Message-
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:18:17 +
To: bug-lilypond bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+
It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer
stretching the lines
On 3/9/11, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Actually if you go back to my example that I reported this with
\header {
title = S C H E R Z O
}
\relative c'' {
\time 3/8
\compressFullBarRests
R1*19*3/8 \break| cis4. | d8 r r | R1*2*3/8 | cis4. | d8 r r | \break
R1*20*3/8
}
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical
New issue 1553 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Staff stretching problem in
2.13.50+
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553
It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer
stretching the lines
On 11-03-09 05:52 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
\version 2.13.53
\header {
% removing the title changes the spacing of the c1 c c c line below!
title = title
}
\relative c'' {
\compressFullBarRests
R1*4
\break
% this will either be spaced on two systems (including the title)
James Lowe James.Lowe at datacore.com writes:
\header {
title = S C H E R Z O
}
\relative c'' {
\time 3/8
\compressFullBarRests
R1*19*3/8 \break| cis4. | d8 r r | R1*2*3/8 | cis4. | d8 r r | \break
R1*20*3/8
}
There is no \markup.
I meant markup in the general sense of text
Comment #1 on issue 1553 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Staff stretching problem
in 2.13.50+
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553
2.12.3 also tries to make the spacing similar on successive lines. The
newer versions just to a better job of it.
\relative c'' {
c1 \break
Comment #2 on issue 1553 by percival.music.ca: Staff stretching problem in
2.13.50+
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553
Sorry for a case of the stupids, but where exactly do you propose that
\noBreak should be placed? With 2.13.47 (sorry, old version), putting
Graham,
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:52:59 +
To: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
Cc: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net, bug-lilypond bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+
On 3/9/11, James
Comment #3 on issue 1553 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Staff stretching problem
in 2.13.50+
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553
but where exactly do you propose that \noBreak should be placed?
I should have used the plural. \noBreak s at every bar in the troublesome
line
Hello,
See attached PNGs
From Keith O'Hara:
---
It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer
stretching the lines, if one line was forced to be stretched.
\version 2.13.51
\score {\relative c'' {
c1 c \break
d1 d d d d d d d
} }
\markup hello
If the first line has
12 matches
Mail list logo
