Urs, you wrote Monday, April 15, 2013 5:07 PM
OK, what the heck:
Here is a patch trying to fix the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh,
along with a comment in the CG.
If I have time I'll look into the other BUILD_DIRECTORY dependencies.
And if you can confirm my impression I would also
Am 18.04.2013 15:10, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Monday, April 15, 2013 5:07 PM
OK, what the heck:
Here is a patch trying to fix the lilypond-book issue in doc-section.sh,
along with a comment in the CG.
If I have time I'll look into the other BUILD_DIRECTORY dependencies.
And if
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:49 PM
I will look into it (when I have time) and see if I can manage to make
the script independent from a present build.
It's just an interesting topic and I'll learn something from it.
I suggest you can just wait if I provide something new.
OK -
Am 18.04.2013 16:10, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:49 PM
On Linux I found the location by the result of `which lilypond-book`.
Would that work on Windows too?
which lilypond-book.py works fine in the WinGW Bash shell.
I've just realised in your script you
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:07 PM
Does that mean that it is 'lilypond-book' on Linux and
'lilypond-book.py' on Windows?
I don't have a Linux installation to hand to check, but as lilypond-book
is written in Python and is not (I think) cross-compiled in GUB to an
executable, all
Am 18.04.2013 16:10, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:49 PM
I will look into it (when I have time) and see if I can manage to make
the script independent from a present build.
It's just an interesting topic and I'll learn something from it.
I suggest you can
Am 18.04.2013 18:20, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:07 PM
Does that mean that it is 'lilypond-book' on Linux and
'lilypond-book.py' on Windows?
I don't have a Linux installation to hand to check, but as lilypond-book
is written in Python and is not (I think)
Another minimal example from
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2795#c16
\paper { indent = 0\mm
line-width = 41\mm
ragged-right = ##f }
\score { \new Staff { g1_retaliate }
\new Staff { e''4 e''' r2 } \\ e'1 }
Workaround
\override DynamicTextSpanner
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Another minimal example from
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2795#c16
\paper { indent = 0\mm
line-width = 41\mm
ragged-right = ##f }
\score { \new Staff { g1_retaliate }
\new Staff { e''4 e''' r2 } \\ e'1 }
Trevor Daniels t.daniels at treda.co.uk writes:
% The tie between the g's is misplaced
c e g b~ c e g
I get a correct ties from this, with 2.16 and 2.17.2.
The tie between the Gs curves up, but is in a good place.
Maybe add directly to whichever of issue 904 or 962 is closer?
This example
Another minimal example from
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2795#c16
\paper { indent = 0\mm
line-width = 41\mm
ragged-right = ##f }
\score { \new Staff { g1_retaliate }
\new Staff { e''4 e''' r2 } \\ e'1 }
Workaround
\override DynamicTextSpanner
11 matches
Mail list logo
