On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Peter Korsgaard jac...@uclibc.org wrote:
John == John Williams john.willi...@petalogix.com writes:
John Hi,
John I'm running a pure BusyBox v1.14.3 rootfs on a PPC440 environment, and
John am seeing some strange behaviour at the initial login prompt.
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 13:14:07 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Are you saying that here:
# define move_from_unaligned16(v, u16p) (memcpy((v), (u16p), 2))
memcpy may be opportunistic and if u16p has type uin16_t,
memcpy will be optimized to assignment? If so, this
should be prevented from
Hi Denis,
the patch converts fuser generic linked list implementation to the 'single
instantion'.
It also change llist 'add' operation to 'append', because the previous works as
a
stack's push and reversing output e.g.:
$ fuser /bin/bash
/bin/bash:1978e 3619e 3705e 20476e
$
On Monday 17 May 2010 12:07:27 Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
Oh boy... But then you'll also have to imitate those many intentional
obscure bashisms in hush, will you not?
Yes.
This was always the plan. Adding support for things people actually _use_ to
busybox is what busybox does.
The
On Friday 21 May 2010 03:02:13 Mike Frysinger wrote:
so really you have no solution other than Windows isnt supported. if you
arent interested in working on something, then stop wasting people's time.
-mike
1) Thats a fairly context-free message. Were you replying to me, or were you
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
[snip]
I don't believe the too big problem is entirely cygnus, I believe that the
fundamental problem is that Win32 and Posix are very dissimilar and making one
look like the other is a big job. (Wine, going the other way,
