This is actually a quick way to use multiple cores with ocaml. Find a
often called function that takes considerable time and offload it to C
Or HLVM, F#, Scala, Clojure or any of the other languages that permit shared
memory parallelism. C is particularly poor in this regard so I would not
just
Jon Harrop jonathandeanhar...@googlemail.com writes:
This is actually a quick way to use multiple cores with ocaml. Find a
often called function that takes considerable time and offload it to C
Or HLVM, F#, Scala, Clojure or any of the other languages that permit shared
memory parallelism. C
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:08:19 +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote:
And OCaml on GPU ? We just tested a recent GPU card with 480
processors at 900Mhz ... this is qui impressive ... and supported by
matlab via cuda-lapack (http://www.culatools.com/) ... I imagine we
could at least use cuda-lapack
There seem to be solutions in theory. I think a colleague had pointed out
one of the papers below, so there is indeed something like a lock-free
garbage collector. Then, why do we worry about much synchronization
overhead? I don't quite understand.
Maurice
Christophe TROESTLER christophe.troestler+oc...@umh.ac.be writes:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:08:19 +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote:
And OCaml on GPU ? We just tested a recent GPU card with 480
processors at 900Mhz ... this is qui impressive ... and supported by
matlab via cuda-lapack
-list@yquem.inria.fr
*Subject:* Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:27:14AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
As I said even in C good results can be achieved, I've seen that, so I
know
Edgar Friendly wrote:
It looks like high-performance computing of the near future will be built
out of many machines (message passing), each with many cores (SMP). One
could use message passing for all communication in such a system, but a
hybrid approach might be best for this architecture,
Hello,
And OCaml on GPU ? We just tested a recent GPU card with 480 processors
at 900Mhz ... this is
qui impressive ... and supported by matlab via cuda-lapack
(http://www.culatools.com/) ...
I imagine we could at least use cuda-lapack from OCaml ?
Cheers,
Christophe
signature.asc
Can you cite any papers from this century? ;-)
Cheers,
Jon.
From: Eray Ozkural [mailto:examach...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 November 2010 13:41
To: Eray Ozkural; Jon Harrop; caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Gabriel
13:41
*To:* Eray Ozkural; Jon Harrop; caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
*Subject:* Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:27:14AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
As I said even in C good results can
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.frwrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:27:14AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
As I said even in C good results can be achieved, I've seen that, so I
know it's doable with ocaml, just a difficult kind of compiler. The
functional
Am Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:05:52 +0100
schrieb Philippe Wang m...@philippewang.info:
Take the current Apple Mac Pro for instance (I take this reference
because it's easy to find and it doesn't evolve very often), with
12-core configuration.
- Two 2.93GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon “Westmere” (12 cores)
-
Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar Friendly:
On 11/15/2010 09:27 AM, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote:
Hi,
I've just read
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2002/11/64c14acb90cb14bedb2cacb73338fb15.en.html
in particular this paragraph:
| What about
On 2010 Nov 15, at 22:46 , Edgar Friendly wrote:
It looks like high-performance computing of the near future will be built out
of many machines (message passing), each with many cores (SMP). One could
use message passing for all communication in such a system, but a hybrid
approach might
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann i...@gerd-stolpmann.dewrote:
Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar Friendly:
* As somebody mentioned implicit parallelization: Don't expect
anything from this. Even if a good compiler finds ways to
parallelize
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2010, 22:35 +0200 schrieb Eray Ozkural:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann
i...@gerd-stolpmann.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar
Friendly:
* As somebody mentioned implicit parallelization: Don't
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Gerd Stolpmann i...@gerd-stolpmann.dewrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2010, 22:35 +0200 schrieb Eray Ozkural:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann
i...@gerd-stolpmann.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:04:54 +0200
Eray Ozkural examach...@gmail.com wrote:
[readworthy text]
I'd like to point out how the big competitor to OCaml deals with it.
The GHC Haskell system has SMP parallization built in for some time,
and it does it quite well.
Wolfgang
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Wolfgang Draxinger
wdraxinger.maill...@draxit.de wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:04:54 +0200
Eray Ozkural examach...@gmail.com wrote:
[readworthy text]
I'd like to point out how the big competitor to OCaml deals with it.
The GHC Haskell system has SMP
Wolfgang wrote:
I'd like to point out how the big competitor to OCaml deals with it.
The GHC Haskell system has SMP parallization built in for some time,
and it does it quite well.
I beg to differ. Upon trying to reproduce many of the Haskell community's
results, I found that even their own
To: Gerd Stolpmann
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Gerd Stolpmann i...@gerd-stolpmann.de
wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2010, 22:35 +0200 schrieb Eray Ozkural:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann
i...@gerd
but I doubt it will ever be realized.
Cheers,
Jon.
*From:* caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:
caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr] *On Behalf Of *Eray Ozkural
*Sent:* 16 November 2010 23:05
*To:* Gerd Stolpmann
*Cc:* caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
*Subject:* Re: [Caml-list] SMP
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:27:14AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
As I said even in C good results can be achieved, I've seen that, so I
know it's doable with ocaml, just a difficult kind of compiler. The
functional features would expose more concurrency.
Could you share a pointer to a paper
Hi,
I've just read
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2002/11/64c14acb90cb14bedb2cacb73338fb15.en.html
in particular this paragraph:
| What about hyperthreading? Well, I believe it's the last convulsive
| movement of SMP's corpse :-) We'll see how it goes market-wise. At
| any
On 11/15/2010 09:27 AM, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote:
Hi,
I've just read
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2002/11/64c14acb90cb14bedb2cacb73338fb15.en.html
in particular this paragraph:
| What about hyperthreading? Well, I believe it's the last convulsive
| movement of SMP's corpse
25 matches
Mail list logo
