[Capistrano] Re: Progress!

2007-02-15 Thread Jamis Buck
The plugin is still in development. My original design did not sufficiently account for the needs of distributed SCM's, and there are a couple people working with me on fixing that gap. I hope to have it all ready to unveil by RailsConf in May, at the very latest, though I'm hoping against

[Capistrano] Re: Progress!

2007-01-27 Thread luke
Hi Jacob, I have been using this method for little while. I just hacked at cache_svn.rb and created cache_rsync.rb. It works like this.. 1. local svn cache is updated using svn up 2. rsync sends changes (minus .svn folders, and deploy.rb) to servers cache folder 3. simple copy from the

[Capistrano] Re: Progress!

2007-01-24 Thread Jamis Buck
On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:14 AM, NeilW wrote: Jamis, Any particular reason why you don't just move from Subversion to SVK and use that as the default? Because we use the checkout strategy, ourselves, which is why it is the default favored by Capistrano currently. :) Having the deploy be a

[Capistrano] Re: Progress!

2007-01-23 Thread Jamis Buck
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:42 PM, S. Robert James wrote: I would suggest to versions of cached_repository: 1. Incremental. 2. Clean (rm -rf and sync everything from the beginning). Could you elaborate on the difference between these? (On Perforce, this would be p4 sync and rm -rf p4 sync