ut I read that: "New tcpborphserver3: fixes unmap issue when programming
>> boffiles" ,
>>
>> could be our case.
>>
>> It is being tested ...
>>
>> 2018-08-13 10:59 GMT+02:00 Marc Welz :
>>>
>>> The one is a symbolic link to the other
>&
The one is a symbolic link to the other
regards
marc
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Raimondo Concu wrote:
> Yes Mark!
>
> I had already seen this link.
>
> What is the difference between tcpborphserver3 and tcpborphserver3-unmap?
>
> Thank You!
> Raimondo
>
>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:51 PM, John Ford wrote:
> That depends where the image lives. If it is on an NFS mounted disk
> somewhere, you have to install the new kernel and file system there. If on
> the flash, you have to install it on the flash.
>
> THe latest stuff ought to be here (Marc is
ch release mem called
> roach VMA close
> roach release mem called
> roach VMA close
> roach release mem called
> roach VMA close
> roach release mem called
> roach VMA close
> roach release mem called
> roach VMA close
> roach release mem called
> roach VMA close
&
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Bela
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Marc Welz <m...@ska.ac.za> wrote:
>>
>> As uboot starts up, interrupt the boot to get the uboot prompt. Then
>> run a printenv command and compare it to the other working roach. If
&g
As uboot starts up, interrupt the boot to get the uboot prompt. Then
run a printenv command and compare it to the other working roach. If
the configuration is bad, you might not have a useful kernel command
line or mac address available - the latter is need for the network
interface to be
Another way of programming the roach is to go
(echo "?progdev filename" ; cat) | nc -q 1 roach-ip-or-name 7147
The protocol to speak to the roach is simple text, so you might not
need a supporting library to drive it, provided you are willing to
open a tcp socket and write/read text from it.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Jack Hickish wrote:
> Here's a preview, which maybe someone more knowledgable with augment /
> correct --
>
> ..
>
> What tgtap does is start a process on the CPU which will read and respond to
> packets from the interface which aren't
etstat -ng", it says "netstat: no support for 'AF INET (igmp)' on
> this system. Can this be due to old version of tcpborphserver ?
>
> Regards,
> Amit
>
> On 08-Jun-17 3:54 PM, Marc Welz wrote:
>> You might be looking in /proc/sys/net, you want to be in /proc/net
entry in /proc/net directory.
>
> Regards,
> Amit
>
> On 08-Jun-17 3:38 PM, Marc Welz wrote:
>> Not 100% sure, but I think you might have to downgrade the linux igmp
>> messages to version 2 to work with mellanox ? There is a
>> force_igmp_version entry in /proc/sys/net ...
>
IGMP version has to be same as the switch. We are
> using the Mellanox SX1012.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
> On 02-Jun-17 4:28 PM, Marc Welz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Amit Bansod <aban...@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
ere a way to monitor IGMP requests
> ? I am not sure if the IGMP version has to be same as the switch. We are
> using the Mellanox SX1012.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
> On 02-Jun-17 4:28 PM, Marc Welz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Amit Bansod <aban...@mpifr-bonn.mpg
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Amit Bansod wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I am trying to subscribe to a multicast group (receive data). How then
> can I configure the core to send an IGMP request ?
You are probably looking for ?tap-multicast-add. Note that you can
only invoke
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Amit Bansod wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am getting this message on giving tap-start on ROACH2:
>
> ?tap-start tap0 gbe0 239.10.1.64 7148 01:00:5E:0A:01:40
Hang on - you are configuring your local interface to be a multicast address.
That
Long shot - could you have run out of space on the roach ?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Heystek Grobler
wrote:
> Good day everyone
>
> I have encountered a weird problem. Everything was working fine until today.
> I cant upload a .bof file to my roach1. I keep
It has been a while, but I am not sure if/how the remote upload was
implemented in the roach1 and what its syntax was - it might have been
different. Telnet to port 7147 on the roach and type ?help - if there
is no progremote, see if you can find something similar ...
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at
This is a bit hazy, but I think that might be because the processor
hasn't stopped properly - some permutation of rebooting, unplugging
and pressing the halt button on the GUI repeatedly sometimes helps.
Also check if the processor isn't running in an overclocked
configuration
regards
marc
On
The fpga<->ppc interface is limited in size - if you want to see huge
memory areas, you will need some sort of windowing/offset scheme
regards
marc
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Franco wrote:
> Doing some more testing, I realize the progdev works when I remove the
gt; register\_dram_controller\_not\_defined
>
>
> Franco
>
>
>
> On 02/12/16 04:32, Marc Welz wrote:
>>
>> telnet to the roach on port 7147 while repeating the operation - what
>> do the #log messages say ?
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Franco <f
telnet to the roach on port 7147 while repeating the operation - what
do the #log messages say ?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Franco wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I tried to test the dram of ROACH2 by porting an example model I had for
> ROACH1.
>
> However when I tried to read
I can't answer the question directly, there is a C utility which will
program fpg files into roach2s, called kcpfpg - it lives on github in
ska-ska/katcp_devel - run the toplevel makefile then cd into fpg and
there should be the utility
regards
marc
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Heystek
his system had been run previously with success using the same python
> operations and .bof files. It's possible that there are required packages
> that are not installed on the ROACH, because the USB drive had been loaded as
> read-only (so packages installed previously may now be absent
There are a number of things to look at:
- the content of /proc/sys/net/*/*rmem*
- various sheduling priorities
- the network driver (and card) - some are better than others, and
many have options to tweak things
- how bursty your traffic from the roach is
- the locking strategy of your
What does
"?listdev" (issued via telnet roach-ip 7147, discard the quotes) have
to say after a program ? If there are lots of register names, then it
probably programmed successfully.
You don't specify if you are using a roach1 or roach2... Generally
you can telnet to the roach on port 7147 via
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Amit Bansod wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to upgrade romfs on ROACH2 via "run tftproot".
>
> https://github.com/ska-sa/roach2_nfs_uboot/blob/master/boot/roach2-root-phyprog-release-2015-04-01.romfs
>
> The process seems to work but it
Hello
Just use a port over 1024 in the upload command
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Amit Bansod <aban...@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I tried as root as well but I get the same error.
>
> Cheers,
> Amit
>
> On 28-Apr-16 10:57 AM, Marc Welz wro
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sam Gordon wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for the lead. I see the line you're referring to (735), but am not
> sure how to go about clearing that register. I tried toggling the transfer
> and receive registers on the GbE block to no avail
> After sending, telnet returns the 'tap-start is OK' message, then enters
> into an endless stream of:
>
> #log warn 183324 raw tx\_queue\_still\_busy\_(8\_words\_to\_send)
>
> Meanwhile, the network configuration in the PPC shows that tap0 has been
> created, and the UDP frame contains the
unix systems do not let unpriviledged users bind ports under 1024
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Amit Bansod wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using upload_program_bof to upload the bof file and I get following
> errors:
>
> Programming FPGA...
> ('Error: request(Request to
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Amit Bansod wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Unfortunately ?tap-info does not show any information like "announce" or
> "query".
That probably means you are running an earlier version of tcpborphserver
> I do see lot of messages like
>
> #log
Assuming you are running a recent version of tcpborphserver, the error
message is generated at line 2601 or so in tg.c, where the beginning
of a packet is compared to the arp header which we can process
(arp_const). It maybe be that your network has:
* unusual arp traffic
* maybe vlan traffic
*
So it depends on exactly what you want - if you are going though one
(eg default) gateway to both subnets, then this might be feasible, but
you will need a very new tcpborphserver. Having multiple routes on a
single interface will require custom fpga work, however.
It isn't clear how smart a
David MacMhaon wrote:
>> I think multicast transmit is easy (just populate the ARP table
>> appropriately). I think multicast receive is also supported with recent
>> versions of the 10GbE yellow block. You could probably check the
>> mlib_devel git commit logs for the yellow block code to find
>
> I use an ancient version of the core package, and here is the help on on
> tg_tap - no mention of a gateway here...
>
> tap_start(self, tap_dev, device, mac, ip, port) method of
> corr.katcp_wrapper.FpgaClient instance
> Program a 10GbE device and start the TAP driver.
>
> @param
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ramesh Karuppusamy
wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> For a set up here, we have a ROACH1 with it 10GbE (assigned to 10.0.0.30)
> ports connected to a HP 5412l switch’s VLAN (subnet 10.0.0.0/24). Is there a
> way to get the ROACH1’s 10GbE
You don't specify if you boot off the onboard flash, via nfs or something else.
If you boot via nfs, the kernel does the initial dhcp request to get
the root filesystem,
so it won't write anything into resolv.conf - that you would have to
do with another
dhcp request, taking care not to
From: Marc Welz <m...@ska.ac.za>
Date: Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [casper] ROACH-1 Boot issue
To: indrajit <indra...@iiap.res.in>
What is autoboot configured as ? It looks like boot from mmc - mmc
(depending on card and controller) can corrupt horribly on power
failur
You need both a valid root file system and kernel on your roach for
the "soloboot" macro to bring up your system. The "run tftproot"
programs a new file system, but it seems that the kernel image isn't
correct, so that must have been managled somehow (possibly with a "run
tftpkernel"). So try to
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Christopher Barnes
wrote:
> Hey Marc,
>
> I plugged the ROACH into a PC, and the USB connection is visible within my
> /dev/ folder. However, when I updated minicom to recognize the correct USB
> connection and then turned on the ROACH (same
If you erase the last couple of sectors of onboard flash, then the uboot
bootloader is gone, at which point the board is unresponsive. There are
ways to recover it via jtag over usb. But you will have to do some work.
Things to try: plug in the roach into a PC: does dmesg show any fdti
devices
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Craig Tong wrote:
> Hi Aniket.
>
> As James has said, if you have been making various telnet connections to
> your Roach2 before running the script it might be worth just rebooting
> the board before trying the casperFPGA scripts. The
The first point looks like you (maybe ?) installed a version of u-boot with
the memory
check and are running it. Updating uboot should be done with care, as
recovering from
a garbled upload is tricky. In other words, if you can tolerate the delay,
and the system is working for you, don't worry too
So I confess to relying on third parties for this information, but isn't
the board populated with 1Gb RAM after all ? Would the crash be trigged by
a kernel memory layout of 3Gb+1Gb rather than 2Gb+2Gb ?
Have you tried the kernel from 9 months ago at github
ska-sa/roach2_nfs_uboot ?
regards
Well, then you are almost there: Note that the NFS server somehow isn't
happy:
Root-NFS: Server returned error -13 while mounting
/home/nfs/roach1/current
regards
marc
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Nishanth Shivashankaran nshiv...@asu.edu
wrote:
Hi All,
We bought a new desktop and I tried installing nfs boot on to the new
computer to boot the roach1 and was trying to bring the roach1 up. But I
think I messed up installing something somewhere and
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Madden, Timothy J. tmad...@aps.anl.gov
wrote:
I am trying to start telnetd on a roach2 booting from the local flash.
I added
telnetd
to /etc/rc.local
When I do a ps -a, no telnet is listed...
Also I cannot telnet to it.
What happens if you run telnetd
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:08 AM, James Smith jsm...@ska.ac.za wrote:
Hello all,
I've given some thought to the topic of writing (and reading) registers on
the ROACH using the python corr module. Often in a design a single register
may be sliced into many bits to control various things. The
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu wrote:
Hi Marc,
/dev/roach/mem exists but I'm not sure what the correct numbers are.
So if you go cat /proc/devices there should be an entry for the roach
driver which should tell you the major number, if there isn't such a line
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu wrote:
This is what comes up.
Character devices:
...
252 roach2_fpga
Ok, so then /dev/roach/config should be c 252 0 and mem c 252 1. When the
programming
fails, does dmesg tell you anything interesting ?
regards
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu wrote:
Hi Marc. Thanks for the help.
I'm not exactly sure what I'm supposed to be looking for, but here's the
dmesg dump:
roach2: claiming matching platform
Using PowerPC 44x Platform machine description
Linux version
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu wrote:
I do that by running tftpkernel at the R2 bootup instead of tftproot,
correct?
yep - printenv will show you what these macros do in case you want to know
more
Is there any cleanup I need to do after the reset like when
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu wrote:
I tried again with progdev and it failed, but I tried
fpga.upload_to_ram_and_program('qdr_err_check_2015_Mar_16_1247.fpg') and it
succeeded.
Could fpga.upload_to_flash('qdr_err_check_2015_Mar_16_1247.fpg') be
exhibiting
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu wrote:
#log error 957577359468 raw
unable\_to\_map\_file\_/dev/roach/mem:\_Invalid\_argument
#log error 957577359471 raw Unable\_to\_map\_/dev/roach/mem
That looks like you have a kernel which doesn't have the roach2 mmap
AM, Marc Welz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Paul Marganian pmarg...@nrao.edu
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've recently run in to a problem with tcpborphserver2 running on Roach
1. In the past, I've been able to debug and develop simply by running this
program interactively, getting
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Paul Marganian pmarg...@nrao.edu wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've recently run in to a problem with tcpborphserver2 running on Roach
1. In the past, I've been able to debug and develop simply by running this
program interactively, getting feedback from print
Hello
Thanks Marc,
Good suggestion. I'd hat the log level set to debug, but hadn't thought
of lowering it. I get a lot of output, most of which I don't quite
understand (see below). At this point, I probably should add that we
are running a tcpborphserver with a mode we created for our
?progdev mba15_obs2d_2014_Jan_31_1052.bof
So this is the same bof file which sometimes works and sometimes does not ?
Or is this subsequent to some upgrade of the roach ? If it is a sometimes
work/not work issue maybe
you are not marking it executable (chmod +x) on transfer or the transfer is
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Matt Strader mstra...@physics.ucsb.edu
wrote:
Hi Alec and Paul,
I should have said, I'm booting from NFS. I see that on
https://github.com/ska-sa/roach2_nfs_uboot, the romfs and uImage is much
newer than boot/tcpborphserver3, which is what I copied into
So as already mentioned, the trick would be to stick to the object files
that implement
only the _katcl functions - that shouldn't require some basics (malloc,
strcmp, etc) but
not the full unix io API. That might mean building individual object files
(parse.c, line.c etc)
rather than the full
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Pablo Vasquez pvasq...@das.uchile.cl
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a 32 bits PIC controller to work with a ROACH. I'm
establishing communication through a standard TCP connection and getting
data from a socket opened between the PIC and the ROACH. About this
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Norbert Bonnici
norbert.bonnici...@um.edu.mt wrote:
Dear Marc,
I've have tried all the possible CR+LF combinations.
Any ideas?
Then I am not sure - I know that some USB dongles attempt to autodetect the
serial
speed - maybe something is going wrong there
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Peter Niu peterniu...@163.com wrote:
Hi,Dave,
Sorry reply you late.
The little trouble I encountered in netboot turned out to be that the
uImage I am using have changed.Well ,As for a test ,I download the latest
uImage from
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Marc Welz m...@ska.ac.za wrote:
There should be an even newer uImage (ie linux kernel) and romfs (ie flash
filesystem, containing tcpborphserver3) at that location.
I think the most notable change is that we have changed the kernel memory
model, so
Hello
I find a updated roach2-root-fullmap-2014-08-12.romfs.Could you please
tell me what should I do to make it work?
Should I put this file in the same place as tcpborphserver3 in Roach2
file system (/usr/local/sbin)?
Thanks for your answer ,I am totally a fresh man. :)
Peter
If
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Richard Black aeldstes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow. Well that seemed to be the magic bullet. Thanks!
Any ideas why this works? Is it because of an NFS lock-out or a 10-GbE
driver issue in the NFS kernel image?
So I don't know. It could also be a version
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:32 AM, David MacMahon dav...@astro.berkeley.edu
wrote:
Are the drivers that provide the /dev/roach/mem and /dev/roach/config
nodes compiled into the kernel image?
Yes, the roach kernels have never used modules
regards
marc
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:11 PM, 牛晨辉 peterniu...@163.com wrote:
hi, all,
I try a soloboot to install a roavh2.What should I do to transfer bof file
from PC to Roach board?the upload command in telnet may a little slowly, it
seems never completed,so i close it first.the second time i upload
Hello
Then I reboot in the minicom window,command dhcp and nfs seperately,the
ouput information is below.It seems that the roach has found the uImage and
transferred the kernel file.But next it doesn't boot up automaticly.
Yes, that is expected.
In my thought, once the roach have loaded the
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Wang Jinqing jqw...@shao.ac.cn wrote:
For tut1 I can use telnet to roach2,the using the command like
nc -w 2 -q 2 192.168.111.10 name.bof
to download the bof file.But tut3.py looks not in that way. What should I
do ?
I think try using the same
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Raul Sapunar Opazo rasapu...@gmail.com wrote:
#log error 963267824776 upload
saving\_of\_bof\_file\_failed:\_No\_such\_file\_or\_directory
#log info 963267824780 raw job\_483\_completed\_with\_code\_1
#log error 963267824781 raw encountered\_fail\_on\_upload
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Roelof Burger roe...@eflex.co.za wrote:
Hi John,
Thanx for the quick response.
I can ping the ROACH from my windows and UBUNTU machines. They are on the
same domains
I left a TELNET session open just now, and when i run the command: ssh -p
7147
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Pablo Vasquez pvasq...@das.uchile.cl wrote:
Hi,
I want to implement KATCP protocol on a PIC32 micro controller. I'm trying
to compile the KATCP C library over a TCP/IP stack freeware provided by
Microchip (the manufacturer of the starter kit I'm working
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Rolando Paz flx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wesley
I did this:
rolando@rolando-MS-7815:/media/TERA/roach/Xilinx_ISE_DS_Lin_14.7_1015_1$
chmod +x xsetup
rolando@rolando-MS-7815:/media/TERA/roach/Xilinx_ISE_DS_Lin_14.7_1015_1$
sudo ./xsetup
./xsetup: 18:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:22 AM, David Bonnici
dav...@ascentsoftware.eu wrote:
Hello Mark. Are there any replacements for the BORPH ioreg interfaces? How
do I access the FPGA registersor am I now kinda restricted to use the
katcp interface?
The ioreg interface is gone.
To access FPGA
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:43 AM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marc,
Thanks for the reply. I would have expected that selecting the 64 MB chunk
with the dram_controller register as described in the DRAM block
documentation on the wiki would get around any such PPC address space
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:57 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to repost this. Just curious if anyone has experience using more than
256 MB of FPGA DRAM on the ROACH, in particular through the PPC interface.
The PowerPC's virtual memory subsystem maps things in 256Mb
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Paul Marganian pmarg...@nrao.edu wrote:
Thanks marc!
Embarrassingly enough, I've noticed these registers before, but never
investigated them:
sys_scratchpad
So scratchpad is just a test register to see if accesses across the bus are
ok (timing issues, etc can
Hello
Then, the error msgs start to show up:
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/3.7.0-rc2+/modules.dep: No such
file or directory
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/3.7.0-rc2+/modules.dep: No such
file or directory
modprobe: FATAL: Could not load
Hello
I'm also going to look at another option which is with the mmap kernel I
have access to the FPGA memory in /dev/roach/mem. I think it should
be fairly easy to write a custom server that runs on the roach that
collects the bram data from the mem and then buffers if for sending
over
Hello
The path FGA-PPC-ethernet-python hasn't been
optimised for speed. So if you can get hold of a
PCI(e) CX4 ethernet card for your capture machine
then you will save yourself a considerable amount
of effort and get way better max transfer rates
However: If this isn't an option, there are a
Hi there
I think building a multicast receiver is non-trivial. Doing multicast the
right way requires that hosts implement IGMP (Internet Group Management
Protocol).
If you are running sshd or telnetd on the roach you can connect to
those over the 10GbE
interface attached to the FPGA. It
Hi there
Regarding the chdir issue:
The way to fix it properly is to install a more recent
tcpborphserver which always programs an absolute path.
(See progdev_cmd() in tcpborphserver3/raw.c on github). I think
that was changed at the beginning of the year.
However, this probably isn't necessary
Hello
-bash: ./tur.bof: cannot execute binary file
- I execute a lot of bof files, but the ROACH show the same error.
Assuming you are running on a roach and not a roach2, the most likely
reason would be that ./tur.bof isn't marked executable, so use chmod +x
to change that.
regards
marc
Hello
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jason Ray j...@nrao.edu wrote:
All,
Occasionally I've noticed (maybe a handful of times over the past few
months) that progdev will fail with our roach2 boards. After working fine
for long periods, it will fail to program out of nowhere and the only
Hello
cockroach3 / $ ls
bin dev etc lib mnt proc root sbin sys tmp usr var
On the solobooted filesystem, bof files live in /usr/bof
When I try to create a boffiles directory, I find that the system does not
allow it (soloboot):
Yes, / is readonly, /usr is writable. We have
Hello
Second, I have tried
?listbof -b /usr/bof
and
?listbof -b/usr/bof (no space)
Oh, I didn't explain that properly - it is the tcpborphserver process
that accepts commandline parameters (eg tcpborphserver3 -b /usr/bof)
But the unusual part is that it seems to be running already, and
AFIK you can use the -b flag of tcpborphserver to set the bof dir u'll need
to edit /etc/init.d/tcpborphserver startup script to change that.
Confirmed -b will work, but for solobooted roaches the startup file is
/etc/rc.tcpborphserver3
regards
marc
Bad magic in file bof header ? That looks like a corrupt bof file ...
Is it really a bof file and not a bin or bit file ?
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Sarfraz Qureshi
sarfrazqureshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shanly,
Thanks for the reply. We have tried doing this and seem to be getting the
I am having a problem receiving 10gbe packets from one of the interfaces on
a dual-port Myricom NIC. I believe the packets are properly addressed, and
wireshark sees them fine, but programmatically we cannot receive them on
10.0.0.102 via C or Python (recvfrom() just hangs), while on
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Gary, Dale E. dale.e.g...@njit.edu wrote:
Hi All,
Hello
We previously were successful in setting up the 10gbe core for ROACH1 using
tap_start, which I believe resulted in a process tgtap appearing in the
ROACH.
I am using the same method for ROACH2 (using
Hi,
Hello
I was wondering if anyone knew the answer to two questions:
1) Can I use more than one KATCP connection within one process?
Yes. See kcppar for an example which issues commands to
multiple katcp servers in parallel.
2) If so, do they need to be protected from each other via
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Rich Lacasse rlaca...@nrao.edu wrote:
Hi Casperites,
Is there a easy way to monitor the temperature of the FPGA and PPC on the
ROACH2? Perhaps using the sensors command on katcp?
Thanks,
Rich
Try
?sensor-sampling raw.temp.ppc period 2000
regards
marc
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:30 PM, John Ford jf...@nrao.edu wrote:
Hi all. We are going to attempt to update the standard romfs file system
to support some additional stuff, like ssh and ???. Can someone give me a
hint where to start?
Well, the current romfs is mainly busybox (unmodified) and
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:52 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hello
Anyone know why there are a bunch of messages like this in dmesg on a ROACH
II:
r2case_event(): Got type 11, code 8, value 1
attempting led toggle
About to toggle cpu_rdy pin7r2case_event(): Got type 11,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:29 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hello
We're experiencing some intermittent failures where it appears the
FPGA is spontaneously deprogramming on the ROACH II. We'd like to try
to track this down by turning on logging in tcpborphserver3. Has
anyone
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Guy kenfack guy.kenf...@gmail.com wrote:
and we get:
?progdev roach2_tut1_2013_Mar_06_1343.bof
#log info 152278 raw
attempting\_to\_program\_roach2_tut1_2013_Mar_06_1343.bof
#log info 152365 raw
Hello
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Jason Castro jcas...@nrao.edu wrote:
I just loaded the latest version of tcpborphserver dated 2013-02-12T17:00:21
for my ROACH2. I've recompiled tutorial1 for a ROACH2 and I'm able to load
the bof file to the FPGA, however when I try to read a register I
Hello
1/
a- how can I find the version of my romfs and also how can I find the
version of my Tcpborphserver3
if you telnet to port 7147, there should be a version string
for tcpborphserver3. The romfs contains a timestamp in its filesystem
label, but since it such a small system, you can
Hello
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:42 PM, G Jones glenn.calt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As mentioned previously, we've been noticing failures of
tcpborphserver3 at a rate that has become annoying enough to finally
track down. We compiled from the github source on the ROACH2 itself
with debugging
Hello
However, we are stuck in debugging the system: we think we are sending stuff
properly, but we can not read anything from the python socket, coming from
our roach 2 fpga.
Try running tcpdump on the receiving PC. If you are using tgtap logic,
you should see occasional arp traffic from the
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo