how would this be different then the byte[] column name you can
already match on?
2010/2/1 Ted Zlatanov t...@lifelogs.com:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:07:01 -0600 Ted Zlatanov t...@lifelogs.com wrote:
TZ On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:06:28 -0600 Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
JE On Fri, Jan
I don't think this is very useful for column names. I could see it
being useful for values but if we're going to add predicate queries
then I'd rather do something more general.
2010/2/1 Ted Zlatanov t...@lifelogs.com:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:42:16 -0600 Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
predicates for values would be nice, = and others would be quite useful
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:41, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think this is very useful for column names. I could see it
being useful for values but
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:41:28 -0600 Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
JE I don't think this is very useful for column names. I could see it
JE being useful for values but if we're going to add predicate queries
JE then I'd rather do something more general.
Do you have any ideas? Are you
2010/2/1 Ted Zlatanov t...@lifelogs.com:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:41:28 -0600 Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
JE I don't think this is very useful for column names. I could see it
JE being useful for values but if we're going to add predicate queries
JE then I'd rather do something more
So it turns out it's not socket related and it seems to only happen on my
second new node only not the first one with a higher load.
I decommissioned the new node and replaced it with another new node from
scratch but the issue persists: clients continue to timeout on it and
eventual the node
One last thing, timeouts start happening to happen more frequently either
with time or just more reads/writes.
Suhail
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Suhail Doshi suh...@mixpanel.com wrote:
So it turns out it's not socket related and it seems to only happen on my
second new node only not the
My list of things I need for predicate queries across column and
supercolumn names:
- bitmask (OR AND1 AND2 AND3 ...). This would make my life easier and
take load off our Cassandra servers. Currently I have to scan the
result sets on the client side to find the things I need.
- date
2010/2/1 Ted Zlatanov t...@lifelogs.com:
My list of things I need for predicate queries across column and
supercolumn names:
- bitmask (OR AND1 AND2 AND3 ...). This would make my life easier and
take load off our Cassandra servers. Currently I have to scan the
result sets on the client
