Hi,
I'm currently building a Registration form for my MonoRail application and
there is a LOT of data to be entered by the user.
So I decided to split it through using a Wizard interface.
I just feel a bit at a loss what the best way would be to carry that
intermediary data from Step to Step.
I
A multi-step wizard *is* a session-wide action.
options:
1. do all steps in Ajax way, aggregating the data on the client. not easily
supported within the MR wizard infra.
2. use session to keep data between steps. easy, simple, scaling issues
(unless using a farm-aware session storage)
3. use
I'm not used to the MR wizard but here are some thoughts:
- instead of validating a fullfledged DB entity, you could validate
plain Form DTO that match each registration steps, monorail controller
has a validator runner that you can use on any DTO bringing validation
attributes
- if session feel
Thanks!
The Form-DTO idea is really good. I'll do that.Also I agree Ken, it's a
Session-wide operation so that's probably the best way to go about that.
I guess what impaired my thinking on this one was that every step of the
Wizard corresponded to one Component in my Entity.
My current approach
Splitting the registration into two cases is also a very good Idea. I could
let them complete their profile through the member area. Thanks for the
suggestion.
Now, off to something else. I tried the DTO approach and just found out
something peculiar: I can't really use the ActiveRecord
Forget the last part about the Validator requiring a AR mapping. I just used
it wrong.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Daniel Hölbling hoelblin...@gmail.comwrote:
Splitting the registration into two cases is also a very good Idea. I could
let them complete their profile through the member
Don't know of any issues. What problems are you experiencing?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Colin Jack colin.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether there are any known issues with using
paricular ServiceBehavior values with Castle WCF, we were originally
using
Ok, I'll dig around a little so see if I can find anything.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jan Limpens jan.limp...@gmail.com wrote:
I could try, but I doubt it would reproduce. This happens sometimes only,
so I guess it is some threading issue and hell knows what else needs to be
emulated
I've seen the odd error message like that, but it has always appeared in our
logs coincident with an app restart. I've always assumed it's a by-product
of the app shutting down it's threads.
2009/9/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
Ok, I'll dig around a little so see if I can find anything.
I'm gonna guess that there's a XmlSerializer in there somewhere.
The Serializer makes a guess at the assembly early in the process
before it has all the information. The exception should be caught and
ignored internally, but you will see it if you have break on
Exceptions turned on.
On Wed,
I have a system where categories can be assigned to multiple objects
(such as a Calendar Event or an Action Item) within the system. Each
of those objects shares an Interface -- ICategoryItem. Then in the
category I have mapped it like this:
private IListICategoryItem _items;
Since NH cannot know in advance from which table the items come, it has to
load them from all the tables. The best approach would be having a
collection of intermediate objects that have a single Any reference.
-Markus
2009/9/11 JakeS jakesteven...@gmail.com
I have a system where categories
Even though, I don't have a solution for you...
From looking at your code snippet, I think your implementation of
ActiveRecord for ICategoryItem is unnatural (neither popular pattern
of ActiveRecord or Repository). Instead of using interface directly on
the model (an object that represent a
Our you can use ActiveRecord Linq (way better):
public static IListModels.Employee GetEmployees() {
return (
from x in Models.Employee.Queryable
select new Models.Employee() {
firstname = x.firstname,
lastname = x.lastname
I am currently developing a Survey management system for my company. I
am getting pretty good at creating straightforward classes that
persist to a database. I do have a couple questions on optimum uses of
AR.
I have a user security model that has User, Roles and Sessions. When a
user logs into
I am using the Automatic Transaction Facility and it seems that any
code in the brail file is executed outside of the transaction e.g.
lazy loading of objects. I am using the nhibernate profiler to see
this behaviour.
It is my understanding that the second level cache will not be used
outside of
Don't do lazy loading in the view
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Tomas tomas.gerhard...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the Automatic Transaction Facility and it seems that any
code in the brail file is executed outside of the transaction e.g.
lazy loading of objects. I am using the nhibernate
Thank you for the advice, but I'm still unsure exactly how to proceed,
partly because if my inexperience with using the repository pattern.
How will that help me here?
If I make a CategoryItem Repository, won't that still have make all
these database calls? Or is this just a method of caching
If you decide to use the repository pattern, then you need two sets
(or namespaces) of classes: Models and Repositories. The ActiveRecord
mapping will be in the Models set. Repository is should not be a model
of your database and it should contain methods (combination actions
and events to do
Krzysztof,
Thank you for looking into it. I opened a ticket. Where should this
code change be, in the DP code?
Thanks
Donn
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to
Yes
The ActiveRecord pattern does provide basic CRUD methods (e.g. Find(),
FindAll() methods). But, I use the Repository pattern as well because
of the complexity of the web application. Thus, I need another
separation in my DAL. The repository interact between your model/
database layers and
That makes sense. I guess I was hoping for too much from
ActiveRecord.
So my best bet is to handle some functionality with some special
queries, instead of just using the ActiveRecord properties on the
models. The Repository pattern is the best place to house some of
those queries, but that's
Colin,
As Craig mentions, there are no known issues on the Wcf Facility trunk
version, is this the version you are using?
For advise on achieving high throughput see
http://blogs.msdn.com/wenlong/archive/2007/08/10/service-instances-and-concurrent-execution.aspx
Cheers
John
On Sep 11, 9:32
I'd love to hear if there is one, but my suspicion is there isn't.
You just have to look at the context being passed to the template and
ensure it matches. The parser will provide some rudimentaty syntax
error exceptions.
On Sep 10, 7:41 am, jamesfarrer james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When
Yes in the DP,
The only workaround that would make it work right now, is if your
entity implemented an interface (even empty) that comes from an
unsigned assembly
2009/9/11 Donn Felker donnfel...@gmail.com:
Krzysztof,
Thank you for looking into it. I opened a ticket. Where should this
code
25 matches
Mail list logo
