Hi i am a PHP developer and work on Codeigniter framework and really
like their active records, now i am trying to develop a small database
form application in .net and found really handy Castle AR and i really
like how its working, but i am facing some problem. i want to use MS
Access as Database
I don't think you will find any tutorials covering the use of Active Record
with an Access database.
That said, Castle ActiveRecord is built on top of the NHibernate ORM - so
what you are looking for is the Jet dialect/driver for NHibernate - this is
not a standard part of NHibernate, but is part
really great thanks for reply, i know that Sql server is the best
combination with .net, i will give a try
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com.
To
The problem with Sql Server is the installation process. We have found a lot
of issues when trying to install SQL on different environments, with many
combinations of platforms (WinXP, Vista, 7), architectures (x86, x64),
installed componentes, etc.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:09 PM, umefarooq
Access also needs some form of installation on a machine. not all windows
machines can run the Jet 4.0 engine (which is what access use).
You should be looking into SQLite in file mode. It has a good support for
NHibernate. It is not however very suitable for high concurrency but I
suspect it is
Regarding firebird...
Is it really a good option for an embedded deployment?
Is the NH support good enough?
As I said in my previous mail we found a lot of issues with sql express
installation process, and we are currently looking for an embedded
alternative. I don't like access, and I was
I'll give a +1 for SQLite. Had a small, single-user project for a
non-profit that we wanted to use ActiveRecord with. SQLite worked
just fine with AR and it exposed just a single file that made backups
easier for the user. I don't recall having any problems and the
project came together
Is the SQLite schema very different from the SQL Server one?
In our project, we'd like to keep two versions of the app, a lite version
with reduced functionality but easier deployment, and a full version, more
powerful and with concurrent users support. Since we are going to use SQL
Server in the
I have not done a comparison of the schema options. For the project I
used, migration was not an option.
However, if you're using ActiveRecord on a new database, there's the
GenerateSchema method to create your schema. You should be able to
use that with both SQLite and SQL Server.
---
Patrick
Hmmm, actually I suppose the real problem would be more different datatypes
than the schema itself.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Patrick Steele patrick.ste...@gmail.comwrote:
I have not done a comparison of the schema options. For the project I
used, migration was not an option.
Master branch seems to be fairly up to date (Windsor 2.5.2) :
https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Components.Scheduler
The only problem is, there hasn't been a release in over a year... César
Sanz, are you there?
--
Mauricio
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Michael mhartma...@yahoo.com
Which version are you using? Did you marked the class as
transactional?
And btw, usually it's a bad ideia to have the controller as a
transaction boundary.
On Jul 16, 11:40 am, Chuck swampy...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to use the CFN plus ATM. I thought I had everything set
up, but I am not
NHibernate makes it easy to smooth out the different data type issues
between databases. For me the only irksome thing is that once you project
becomes brownfield the approach to database migrations for Sql Server and
Sqlite are quite different - with sql server you can add/remove/change
columns
I was considering registering some types via their attribute
(ServiceContract)
I found an example at
http://docs.castleproject.org/Windsor.Registering-components-by-conventions.ashx
But it doesn't compile - it comes close, which is why I thought I'd
ask. I'm using 2.5.3
I was wondering if this
Did you try redirecting the assembly bindings? See a webconfig from an mvc 3
project for an example. That'll work as long as the issue is just the
assembly version and not a breaking api change.
On Jul 16, 2011 7:42 PM, Michael mhartma...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey all, I upgraded to Windsor 2.5.1 and
There is no need to use binding redirects. The master branch is already
updated for Windsor 2.5.2
--
Mauricio
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Shawn Hinsey smhin...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you try redirecting the assembly bindings? See a webconfig from an mvc
3 project for an example. That'll
16 matches
Mail list logo
