Okay,We have two distinct requests here.
One is for WCF stuff, and as presented, it looks like life styles can
resolve that.
Second is for additional providers for handlers, for things like MEF, lazy
component discovery, etc.
Is this accruate?
2009/8/11 Krzysztof Koźmic krzysztof.koz...@gmail.com
Hey guys,
Just returned from a quick vacation. I don't think WCF presents any
different scenario than MEF or any lazy discovery. WCF Facility would take
advantage of the same deferred resolution hook to provide WCF managed
proxies that were only defined in the standard system.serviceModel
In that case, I don't understand it, do read the app.config to integrate
with that?
2009/8/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
Hey guys,
Just returned from a quick vacation. I don't think WCF presents any
different scenario than MEF or any lazy discovery. WCF Facility would take
The original feature request for the WCF Facility was to not require
registering a client component for a WCF interface that is already defined
in the app.config/web.config via the system.serviceModel section. This
makes it nice and DRY to not have to indicate that you want a WCF Facility
managed
Okay, now that I understand it, it is the same, yes.I'll start a new thread
with thoughts about the whole topic
2009/8/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
The original feature request for the WCF Facility was to not require
registering a client component for a WCF interface that is already
forgot to mention, the new thread is going to be in the dev group, which is
more appropriate
2009/8/11 Ayende Rahien aye...@ayende.com
Okay, now that I understand it, it is the same, yes.I'll start a new
thread with thoughts about the whole topic
2009/8/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
-project-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:castle-project-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Craig Neuwirt
Sent: Wednesday, 12 August 2009 3:18 a.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Design questions for resolution of IOC-ISSUE-161
The original feature request for the WCF Facility
Hm,I would say that we need a LazyHandler, then, no?
2009/8/6 Krzysztof Koźmic krzysztof.koz...@gmail.com
Hi,
Funny, how we were discussing with Craig this very issue not further than
two days ago.
Anyway, I agree, that we should have something like ILazyComponentsProvider
(being handler
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:castle-project-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ayende Rahien
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2009 9:24 a.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Design questions for resolution of IOC-ISSUE-161
Hm,
I would say that we need a LazyHandler, then, no?
2009/8/6
@googlegroups.com [mailto:
castle-project-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ayende Rahien
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2009 9:24 a.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Design questions for resolution of IOC-ISSUE-161
Hm,
I would say that we need a LazyHandler, then, no?
2009/8
After speaking to Krzysztof Kozmic, this question is directed primarily
to Ayende and Craig Newirt,
I require that Windsor has the ability to resolve component types to a
WCF client endpoint configured in system.servicemodel/client rather than
to a well-known type.
Krzysztof suggested that I ask
IHandlerSelector is how I would handle this.You would need to provide an
implementation of IHandler that provide instances via the WCF client
support.
Shouldn't be too hard, I think.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Adam Langley alang...@winscribe.com wrote:
After speaking to Krzysztof Kozmic,
[mailto:castle-project-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ayende
Rahien
Sent: Thursday, 6 August 2009 11:08 a.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Design questions for resolution of IOC-ISSUE-161
IHandlerSelector is how I would handle this.
You would need to provide
Ayende,
I believe the IHandlerSelector was mainly used to select from an existing
set of handlers. What we
need is HandlerMissing support which will allow us to dynamically return
handlers and/or register them
at the same time. I am on vacation for a few days, but we can chat about
this (If
14 matches
Mail list logo
