Re: [Catalyst] Modifying the base url

2006-12-15 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Julien GILLES [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, is-it possible to add a default base address to Catalyst urls ? I have a classical application with /foo, /bar/123 urls, and I want to call them as http://localhost:3000/baz/foo, http://localhost:3000/baz/bar/123, having all Catalyst.uri_for

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::View::TT

2006-11-14 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Ivan Wills [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote: Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ivan Wills wrote: Hi, I'm using Catalyst::View::TT to display my pages. I'm having trouble removing excess blank lines appearing at the top of my files. I realise this is not normally

Re: [Catalyst] IDE/editor

2006-11-14 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all, right? [grin] With that out of the way, what IDE or editor

Re: [Catalyst] IDE/editor

2006-11-14 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christopher H. Laco wrote: Ian Docherty wrote: Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for Linux) http://www.ultraedit.com/ I think it gives you everything you listed and more. Regards Ian Docherty Last time I

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::View::TT

2006-11-13 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ivan Wills wrote: Hi, I'm using Catalyst::View::TT to display my pages. I'm having trouble removing excess blank lines appearing at the top of my files. I realise this is not normally a problem but I am playing with mixing SVG and XHTML (with

Re: [Catalyst] Is Catalyst what I want?

2006-10-27 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Hermida, Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I'd never used TT, so you might be even more at home. I have been trying to decide what is the best 'View' to use with Catalyst and it is so difficult to get an up-to-date comparison that I can understand of the main views available for

Re: [Catalyst] Is Catalyst what I want?

2006-10-27 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TT. Mostly beacuse I have access to catalyst context here. I've tried to use ClearSilver but it was too simple for me (almost every controller needed additional 10-20 lines of code). Keep in mind that although ClearSilver isn't as syntactically

Re: [Catalyst] [Announce] Catalyst 5.7000

2006-07-08 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Vlad Bazon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Soon. the Debian way (apt-get, synaptic) is for me The Simple method of installing/ updating Catalyst (and work fine). When will have C-5.7000 on Debian? Thanks for your great work! On 7/8/06, Gavin Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quote who=Marcus

Re: [Catalyst] [announce] Catalyst 5.70 developer release.

2006-06-29 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [..] for example: first 5.6902, then 5.70_1 then 5.70. From debian point of view 5.70 is before 5.6902, 5.70_1 is invalid (so probably should be changed to 5.70.01 but then it's after 5.70 so probably should be changed into 5.69-5.70pre1 etc.). But this

Re: [Catalyst] [announce] Catalyst 5.70 developer release.

2006-06-28 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Derek Poon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please be consistent with the number of digits in the versioning scheme. While it may be easy for humans to guess that 5.7001 comes before 5.80, packaging tools like RPM and APT could easily get confused. While such problems could be worked around

Re: [Catalyst] [announce] Catalyst 5.70 developer release.

2006-06-28 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote: Derek Poon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please be consistent with the number of digits in the versioning scheme. While it may be easy for humans to guess that 5.7001 comes before 5.80, packaging tools like RPM and APT

Re: [Catalyst] uri rewrite (drop port)

2006-06-27 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Armin Obersteiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Armin Obersteiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uri rewrite (drop port) To: catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:02:21 +0200 hi! I'd like to drop the port from the base/uri part: 'request' = bless( { 'base' = bless(