Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
OK, don't mean to sound like a whiner here, and I haven't spent any time
investigating the various GCC packages, but it's making me laugh that
it's been suggested I download a C++ development package just so I can
get my perl modules to install.
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 6/30/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The hassle is that we are a Windows shop and my boss only cares about
results. To roll out an .ASP application is only a matter of using the
resources that are already installed in the development
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
The problem is that I never managed to get Apache to run mod_perl
properly without crashing. But maybe that's just me, since I've seen
other people reporting the opposite. But it works fine enough for my
current purposes under Apache::Registry.
We've
On 6/30/06, Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't do that. Bad things will happen. Always compiled your modules with
the same compiler used for the perl install itself on Windows. To that
point, you could compile perl in .NET, then do the modules that way too.
FUD.
VS.NET 2003
On 6/30/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that's the point - that AS has switched to gcc and it's *generally*
preferable to use the same compiler as your perl binary was built with.
There's nothing in the release notes indicating that they've done this
(they've recently switched
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 6/28/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygwin or
On 6/29/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, don't mean to sound like a whiner here, and I haven't spent any time
investigating the various GCC packages, but it's making me laugh that
it's been suggested I download a C++ development package just so I can
get my perl modules to
Hugh Lampert wrote:
I mean I only want to finish my small app. My boss is going to split his
gut when I tell him first I need to download a C++ dev package so I can
install the application framework that actually is written in perl.
Looks like I'll be sticking to whatever Catalyst modules
You may want to look into Vanilla / Strawberry perl as an alternative
to ActivePerl.
It includes the mingw (gcc) compiler and nmake, and the perl included
is compiled from scratch with mingw, rather than ms compilers.
http://win32.perl.org/wiki/index.php?title=Vanilla_Perl
The files are here (get
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to let you know something amusing - I tried the preconfigured
CPAN.pm that comes with ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. First, it took about 10
minutes to figure out I needed to type Enter+Space instead of
Hugh Lampert wrote:
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to let you know something amusing - I tried the preconfigured
CPAN.pm that comes with ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. First, it took about 10
minutes to figure out I needed to type
Matt S Trout wrote:
Once you've got CPAN configured and nmake and a gcc installed,
http://shadowcatsystems.co.uk/static/cat-install
will install Catalyst itself plus deps hands-off via CPAN (with a
little help from ppm on windows)
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:09:13PM -0400, Hugh Lampert wrote:
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygwin or other
environments?
Hugh Lampert wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
Once you've got CPAN configured and nmake and a gcc installed,
http://shadowcatsystems.co.uk/static/cat-install
will install Catalyst itself plus deps hands-off via CPAN (with a
little help from ppm on windows)
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit
On 6/28/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygwin or other
environments? the CPAN module was
On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for responding! Perhaps you can forward this to the mailing
list, as I am unable to reach it from my work (the mail server will not
accept my relays.)
Done. I'll answer your message without removing anything you wrote.
I looked at the
16 matches
Mail list logo
