The results and final report of the Plat_forms international programming
contest were released yesterday in a press conference in Nuremberg, and will be
published today June 20th, 2007 on http://www.plat-forms.org/.
For each of the categories Perl, PHP and Java, three teams of three people
Hi,
-- Dami Laurent (PJ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The results and final report of the Plat_forms international
programming contest were released yesterday in a press conference in
Nuremberg, and will be published today June 20th, 2007 on
http://www.plat-forms.org/.
the results are now online
hate to admit it, but perl took a hammering in terms of the
completeness of solutions thing, maybe the most important metric. see
the charts on page 13.
You might see it that seperating the code from the html takes a little
longer, but gives you a better architecture. I wonder how it would
work
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
hate to admit it, but perl took a hammering in terms of the
completeness of solutions thing, maybe the most important metric. see
the charts on page 13.
Perl WSDL/SOAP tooling is pants. Film at 11.
I do know of a large suite of
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
hate to admit it, but perl took a hammering in terms of the
completeness of solutions thing, maybe the most important metric. see
the charts on page 13.
SOAP slowed 'em down, it seems.
I only scanned the report, but lots of
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:33:50AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
Overall, seems like a lot of mixed results -- too much variability
to draw any concrete conclusions. Not that that will stop the camps
from using the report to support their claims of superiority. ;)
I think one of the main
Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, à 18 heures 28, Matt S Trout écrivait :
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
hate to admit it, but perl took a hammering in terms of the
completeness of solutions thing, maybe the most important metric.
see the charts on page 13.
Cédric Bouvier wrote:
Unfortunately, the requirements just included a WSDL file, and the words
implement that!. So we were doomed. The pressure and lack of sleep
must have blinded me, for I didn't give up at once, and wasted valuable
time trying to get something working.
I'm no expert on SOAP,
Cédric Bouvier wrote:
[snip]
To me, it seems that the enterprise world take it for granted that
SOAP is a synonym for web services, the only way to go, whereas the
Perl community generaly considers it as useless and as heavy as a dead
donkey.
Ha ha. Couldn't agree more.
-=Chris
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:39:47PM +0200, C?dric Bouvier wrote:
To me, it seems that the enterprise world take it for granted that
SOAP is a synonym for web services, the only way to go, whereas the
Perl community generaly considers it as useless and as heavy as a dead
donkey. Still, we
interesting inside view of the whole thing, Cédric. Thanks.
On 6/20/07, Cédric Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, à 18 heures 28, Matt S Trout écrivait :
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
hate to admit it, but perl took a hammering in
Hi,
-- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only scanned the report, but lots of interesting bits in there.
The two PHP teams used the same framework (and not sure about the
third, but perhaps similar), where the Perl and Java teams had a wider
range of frameworks. Might explain why the
12 matches
Mail list logo
