Hello Bashir,
Maybe it's because your dataset present too much weak diffraction spots.
You can try to change the setting for the strong pixel detection. You
can Try to decrease a little bit de I/sigma. Have you define the
resolution range?
I read on your message that you resolution start at
Am Mittwoch 07 September 2011 21:39:07 schrieb Muhammed bashir Khan:
Dear All;
I am trying to to xsale several data sets together, but it gives an error
of
!!! ERROR !!! INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF COMMON STRONG REFLECTIONS.
PROGRAM IS UNABLE TO PRODUCE A SCALED DATA SET.
Original Message
Subject: XSCALE!!! ERROR
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:39:07 +0200
From: Muhammed bashir Khan muhammad.bashir.k...@univie.ac.at
Dear All;
I am trying to to xsale several data sets together, but it gives an
error of
!!! ERROR !!! INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF
To Boaz: I seperated the large crystals and checked its diffraction already.
While the diffraction is quite poor, only several dots could be seen. T_T
I washed the seeds twice with my buffer and seed the drop immediately after
setting it. Thanks for your advices and I will try the additives.
To
SnowDeer,
Additives are indeed a good idea, make sure you do it in an informed
manner, each additive is different and you will
get a benefit only if you know how to do it right. I do not recommend a
random approach.
For example, you mention glycerol. There is a lot to know on the subject
Hi all,
Just a quick reminder that the deadline for applications for this EMBO
practical course is 30 September. See:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/training/handson/course_110912_structures.html#registration
--Gerard
-- Forwarded message --
Hi all,
From 14-18 November, an EMBO
There is a vacancy for an experienced crystallographer to lead the
crystallography/crystallization section at our UK site (Alderley Park).
Please search for reference RD237 on our careers pages on
www.astrazeneca.com or you can find the ad directly using this link
After switching (finally) to 6.2.0 and therefore to Refmac 5.6.0117 I
have found a problem working with DNA that I have not seen with
6.1.13/5.5.0109. Namely,
- if I use the pdb file produced by Coot (0.7.pre-1.3470) that seems to
output DNA as Ad/Td/Gd/Cd no matter what the input names were,
On 08/09/11 15:35, Ed Pozharski wrote:
After switching (finally) to 6.2.0 and therefore to Refmac 5.6.0117 I
have found a problem working with DNA that I have not seen with
6.1.13/5.5.0109. Namely,
- if I use the pdb file produced by Coot (0.7.pre-1.3470) that seems to
output DNA as
a tabindex=1 title= name=ratsqgtrrg
href=http://tdnsoftware.by.ru/romio1.html;http://tdnsoftware.by.ru/romio1.html/a
Sorry - I already belong to 2 bbs and to add another would make me really a
mess.
Can someone out there who is a CNS developer please send me an email off
this bb I need to ask a glibc question.
Thanks, Laurie Betts
laurie.betts0...@gmail.com
Is there a CNS BB?
JPK
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Laurie Betts laurie.betts0...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry - I already belong to 2 bbs and to add another would make me really a
mess.
Can someone out there who is a CNS developer please send me an email off
this bb I need to ask a glibc
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:28:28PM -0500, Jacob Keller wrote:
Is there a CNS BB?
Yes.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cnsbb/
-b
--
| Ben Eisenbraun
| SBGrid Consortium | http://sbgrid.org |
| Harvard Medical School | http://hms.harvard.edu
13 matches
Mail list logo
