Dear Tobias,
Thank you for identifying the 0.6A resolution structure solved by
electron diffraction as 6KJ3. This is a good, genuine de novo structure
determination using direct methods (SHELXD) on high-resolution data. The
R-values are not flattering (above 30%) but one can't expect too
The molecular weight of the Hope Diamond is about 5.5e24 Daltons, and I
bet it diffracts to better than 1.0 A.
For every rule there are exceptions, and for every distribution there
are "outliers". Maybe a more informative number would be obtained after
discarding the best 1-5% and see what
Hi Tobias,For what is worth, we report 1.22 A for single particle cryo-EM ;-)) But very likely there is more in that dataset, we should know soon.Best wishes,RaduOn 9 Jun 2020 3:11 pm, Tobias Beck wrote:Dear all,Thanks a lot! (I should have used the PDB query myself for neutrons, sry, my bad)As
Dear all,
Thanks a lot! (I should have used the PDB query myself for neutrons, sry,
my bad)
As there was a request to share the bioRxiv links, here they are:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.21.106740v1
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.22.110189v1
along with the
Just queried the PDB and found 4AR3 for neutron at 1.05A.
Best
Roberto
On 9 Jun 2020, at 14:46, Tobias Beck
mailto:tobiasb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear all,
Thanks for the link to the latest BioRxiv papers! So for cryo EM it is 1.2 now.
Any numbers for neutron?
Best, Tobias.
Tobias Beck
I’m reminded of a comment Wim Hol made at an ACA meeting many years ago during
a discussion of resolution. He noted that you had to add molecular weight into
the equation also to really get a handle on how impressive an experiment is.
Some proteins are larger small molecules, others are tour de
Dear all,
Thanks for the link to the latest BioRxiv papers! So for cryo EM it is 1.2
now. Any numbers for neutron?
Best, Tobias.
Tobias Beck schrieb am Di. 9. Juni 2020 um 15:35:
> Dear all,
>
> I was asked by a student what the highest resolution is, for each of the
> four methods listed
Recent cryoEM resolution in apoferritin (yes, the Lysozyme of cryoEM, but
still) seems to be 1.2 A by two groups in the UK and Germany.
Notably (yes, I am kidding, please don't think that I really believe this)
the resolution of MODEL structures is ZERO angstroms :) It's perfectly
good... as long
Dear all,
I was asked by a student what the highest resolution is, for each of the
four methods listed above. Maybe someone has researched the current numbers
previously and would like to share them? For X-ray, I found 0.48 A in the
PDB. For EM method details, the PDB gives me 0.6 A, but it is
Dear Stuart,
yes, you are right. I also submitted successfully a first Phaser job to
our number cruncher.
Thanks a lot for this fast work around.
To ask for the SSH port setting within the final user/password window
would be extremely helpful to avoid a fixed port setting.
An egoistic dream on
Apologies, it did work for me, I think. I just hadn't set my username.
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:45, Stuart McNicholas
wrote:
> My idea seemingly hasn't worked for me. I'll keep trying.
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:17, Stuart McNicholas <
> stuart.mcnicho...@york.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Dear Michael,
My idea seemingly hasn't worked for me. I'll keep trying.
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:17, Stuart McNicholas
wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>I think that the port number is hardwired in CCP4i2 on line 439 of
> $CCP4/share/ccp4i2/core/CCP4JobServer.py
>
> transport =
Dear all,
This is a very good idea for development: with many of us port-forwarding to
access resources from home, the capacity to specify a non-standard port for ssh
connections in i2 can in principle allow submission from a home laptop to a
work-based server…very efficient !
Please keep me
Dear Michael,
I think that the port number is hardwired in CCP4i2 on line 439 of
$CCP4/share/ccp4i2/core/CCP4JobServer.py
transport = paramiko.Transport((sP.machine, 22))
also there are various calls to the "paramiko" library which handles ssh,
which do not pass a port number and so
14 matches
Mail list logo
