Hi all,
The deadline to register for the COMPPÅ symposium at Columbia University in New
York (covering production, structure determination, functional analysis and
engineering of membrane proteins, 17-19 June 2018) is coming up in less than a
week - May 1!
Register here to attend and/or
Hi Philippe,
The affinity was measured by SPR where we immobilized the protein on the chip.
One thing I forgot to mention is that the association rate (kon) shown in SPR
experiment for this compound is faster (>10-fold faster) compared to other
analogues with similar koff. There is a pi-pi
Unfortunately it is unlikely that the costs for robotic equipment (at least the
larger scale equipment) will come down much.
It is effectively all ‘bespoke’ equipment and will never benefit from high
volume manufacturing (nothing like phones or cars).
How many crystallisation centres are needed
Dear Daniel,
I appreciate you for your really worthwhile comments that would be useful
for other scientists in this field.
Thanks.
Frank
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 17:13 Daniel M. Himmel, Ph. D. <
danielmhim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I skimmed your paper, and overall it looks like a good overview
>
I skimmed your paper, and overall it looks like a good overview
of high-throughput protein crystallization. However, I was surprised
that no mention was made of Formulatrix Rock Maker software,
which is an excellent computer-aided graphical tool for designing
crystallization screens rapidly.
For proteins in membranes, or proteins purified in the presence of detergents
and/or lipids, the active site is sometimes surrounded by a hydrophobic mileau.
The actual concentration that the binding site sees is then dependent on
partitioning of the ligand between the water (where its
Le Jeudi 26 Avril 2018 16:50 CEST, WENHE ZHONG a
écrit:
Just to be sure: how was the nM affinity evaluated ? By in vitro measurements,
or by obtaining an IC50 by tests on cells ?
Of course, if you are mentioning an IC50, you may have a measurement of the
Just a friendly reminder that the deadline for applying the upcoming
CCP4 school at APS is next Wednesday (5/2/2018), please apply or finish
your application (if you have already applied) if you wish to
participate in the school. Please let us know if you have any
questions/concerns.
Hi Markus,
just be aware that silica-based SEC columns are very sensitive to alkaline pH
conditions, so you should not use them at pH higher that 7.5
We found that to be a limitation and thus chose polymer-based columns.
Hth,
ciao,
Sebastiano
> On 26 Apr 2018, at 18:03, Markus Heckmann
Dear all,
We are looking for a size exclusion chromatography column
(silica-based) for protein purification prior to a MALS-detector. We
looked for (www.waters.com BEH-450), Sepax (Unix-C 300) and Phenomex
(BioZen SEC-3). Any 'column' tips or recommendations when dealing
with large proteins
Dear Community,
A little bit out of topic here. We are applying the structure-based approach to
design compounds that can bind our protein target. We have synthesized a series
of analogues based on the same scaffold with different substituents at one
particular site. The most potent analogue
Just to make the point that you are not alone, I have observed the same
issue on Mac with CCP4-installed Coot 0.8.9.1 using latest OS and
Xquartz. This started happening with a recent update.
Interestingly, the 'Edit Chi Angles' dialogue now allows us to modify
non-chi angles as well (not
Update 055 should have reverted out ASP, and update 056 (coming real soon now)
should fix the other issues.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
"Weiergräber, Oliver H."
Sent: 26 April 2018 15:06
To: ccp4bb
Indeed, update 54 from Mar 29 seems to have messed up several monomer
definitions and/or their handling in coot (the version distributed with ccp4):
- GLU and ASP contain lines referencing GLN and ASN, respectively, preventing
coot from finding any chi angles.
- For GLN, chi angles appear twice
Oops - oh dear - GLN labels should* NOT *appear in a list devoted to GLU!!
Well spotted..
Eleanor
On 26 April 2018 at 10:34, Chris Richardson
wrote:
> Many thanks for explaining where it is going awry.
>
> Looking at GLU.cif in the monomer library that is part of
A postdoctoral position is available to work on a Wellcome Trust funded project
to investigate the molecular mechanisms of regulation of alternative pre-mRNA
splicing in the group of Prof. Chris Smith
(https://www.bioc.cam.ac.uk/research/uto/smithc
Many thanks for explaining where it is going awry.
Looking at GLU.cif in the monomer library that is part of the CCP4
distribution, it contains the following lines:
GLN chi1 N CA CB CG 180.000 15.000 3
GLN chi2 CA CB CG CD 180.000
Dear all,
A permanent position as Research Engineer for the recently funded
microfocus and serial crystallography beamline MicroMAX is now available
at the MAX IV Laboratory. For more information and to apply please
follow this link:
https://lu.varbi.com/en/what:job/jobID:203507
or see the
2 PostDoctoral positions are available in the Structural Biology and
Biophysics Unit @ Fondazione Ri.MED (www.fondazionerimed.eu).
The successful candidates will carry out scientific projects in the field
of structural biology and biophysics aimed at understanding the molecular
mechanisms
> On 26 Apr 2018, at 09:19, Chris Richardson wrote:
>
> I've just compiled Coot on the same Mac using Fink, and the dialogue for this
> version of Coot shows CA <--> CB, CB <--> CG, and CG <--> CD angles for the
> same residue.
From a quick look at the Fink
?We have an issue with the 'Edit Chi Angles' dialogue in Coot on Macs using the
version of Coot bundled with CCP4.
For some residues - such as Glu - the dialogue only shows the C <--> CA angle.
If you tick the 'Add Chi Angles for Hydrogens' box, it adds CA <--> N.
I've just compiled Coot on
Is this another example of crystallising the reagent and not the desired
material? No wonder molecular replacement failed with a DNA search model .
Eleanor
On 25 April 2018 at 20:06, George Sheldrick
wrote:
> Dear Rafal et al,
>
> With some help from Kay I think that
22 matches
Mail list logo