The CentOS development team is please to announce the release of CentOS
3.9 for i386 and x86_64.
This is the final minor release for CentOS-3. With this release CentOS-3
has entered its maintenance phase during which time only fixes for
critical functional and security issues will be provided.
Lo que dice Osvaldo, tambien funciono, el menos en mi caso. Creo que fue solo
con la ultima instrucción (all-generic-ide). Lo del USB fue lo primero que
probe haciendolo de la siguiente manera:
- Actualizacion de bios (siempre hay que verificar eso)
- En la bios de la
Esto lo he probado pero no funciona , se queda colgado . Como dice Alex , lo
tengo que hacer en un cliente. Estuve pensando copiar a un disco duro los
cds de instalacion, pero lo del usb seria una buena idea y mas comoda. Pero
no he visto la forma de indicarle que lea del usb .
Como haria para
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Camron W. Fox wrote:
DVD hyper multidrive, capable of reading and writing DVD-R, DVD-RW,
DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, DVD-R for DL, and DVD+R DL.
I've used an Optiarc to burn all that in Linux, some with cdrecord
some with NeroLinux. Optiarc is a joint NEC/Sony company.
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:46 -0400, Barry L. Kline wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
simon wrote:
Dear All,
I have been running linux 9 server as a dns and mail server and is workin
fine..
i want to install CENTOS 5 with all the latest mail server software and
beast wrote:
On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote:
CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and
possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications
current.
I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is
3.1.1,
today OO in Centos5 is
John R Pierce wrote:
I've used an Optiarc to burn all that in Linux, some with cdrecord
some with NeroLinux. Optiarc is a joint NEC/Sony company. DVD
drives/burners are commodity these days with standard interfaces.
not many support dvd-ram, however, which was buried in his list.
But the
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts = 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by
package httpd
Show us the output of yum -d 5 update, please.
[...]
Dep Number: 1/1
httpd requires: initscripts = 7.93.26.EL-1
-- Processing Dependency:
beast wrote:
On 25/07/07 10:38 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
They are kept functional and secure. I think that is enough in many
cases.
If someone really needs a special app they can always compile it
and/or install it in their $HOME.
Are you saying that you predict users will not need
Forgot to mention - the server will be FJ Primergy RX200_S3 and
RX300_S3.
what does the vendor supply? those are 1U rack servers (appears the
RX200-S3 is, I can't seem to find any pix of the RX300)? they probably
have a slimline internal dvd that can be optionally DVD +/- RW
Is it dropping packets or Ethernet frames?
Iptables may be dropping packets, check cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -w
see how many connections iptables is keeping track of. The default value
held by this entry varies heavily depending on how much memory you have. On
128 MB of RAM you will get
epel exists, but not ready for prime time? I'm assuming that
when it is ready it will go here.
EPEL isn't a CentOS repo ... as all the other ones you have listed above
are. It is your box though, so you can put it where you want. I would
have it in the other 3rd party repos section
Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same
thing.
Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the plus
repo it needs to be the same priority as base and updates.
That could be a problem. Thanks.
Well ... actually, having plus lower is a good
Martin Marques wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
but thats neither here nor there, PAE is a universal issue for any
x86 32bit system with 4GB+ ram, with PAE disabled, the BIOS, PCI, AGP
or PCI-express, etc IO spaces consume anywheres from .5 to 1GB of the
32bit address space. PAE is a hardware
ajulvestad wrote:
Ok, this is the case:
I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks.
Setup:
md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1
md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3
Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a
reboot where it attempted to fix the raid, but
Martin Marques wrote:
Nick wrote:
Hi,
Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's
shows up as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 29008
On 7/26/07, Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the
highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base
etc.
Is there a HOWTO
On 7/26/07, Narasimha Valiveti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I noticed FUSE is not there by default disabled on centos 5. Is there a
separate RPM that includes FUSE module for
the same kernel as of centos 5 ?. I have installed the latest centos 5
update, don't see FUSE enabled .
[EMAIL
Hello,
I noticed FUSE is not there by default disabled on centos 5. Is there a
separate RPM that includes FUSE module for
the same kernel as of centos 5 ?. I have installed the latest centos 5
update, don't see FUSE enabled .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pwd
/lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.8.el5/source
[EMAIL
On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the question was if it was possible to get them with yum.
Personally, I never download SRPMS with yum.
On a somewhat related issue, is the 'centos SRPM repo' supposed to
work? The suff in this bug report:
Martin Marques spake the following on 7/26/2007 1:46 PM:
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
Another option is that you try to boot with the PAE kernel. That
kernel is made to go over the 4GB boundary on 32bit.
Didn't work for me. :-(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free
Is there an RPM for this? I think it's in the kdeedu package on the FC6
DVD. My wife is an amateur astronomer and she uses this excellent
program. If upstream isn't including it, can I get it and not break my
CentOS 4.4 system? (Also, I'd like to migrate her and my daughter to
CentOS). TIA, Lanny
--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the
highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base
etc.
Is there a HOWTO for this (setting up a personal repo) in the wiki? I
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
Another option is that you try to boot with the PAE kernel. That
kernel is made to go over the 4GB boundary on 32bit.
Didn't work for me. :-(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 3237236
On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well ... actually, having plus lower is a good thing. BUT, it requires
you to exclude the packages that exist in Base/Updates if you use the
Plus repo.
Sounds like a choice between some of plus versus all of plus, correct?
--
Dave K
Unix
--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:59 PM -0600 drew einhorn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30,
...
That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them.
I smell an old-time BASIC programmer. ;)
drew einhorn wrote:
On 7/26/07, *Dave K* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the
highest priority. In that case,
On 7/26/07, Dave K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the
highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base
etc.
I'm just starting to play with priorities, but I actually
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070719
CentOS/1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos Firefox/1.5.0.12
I updated Firefox a few days ago. Now, very frequently, it freezes, for
a few seconds, each time. Is this a known bug? Does it have a simple
cure? TIA, Lanny
On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should probably wait until they announce that the EPEL repo is
released and correct all the missing dependencies first.
Yes, now if only they marked their packages in some identifiable way
that could be easily seen.
/time to stir the
drew einhorn wrote:
Information about the epel repository should be added
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
But since it is an immutable page someone with more privileges
than I will have to do it.
We should probably wait until they announce that the EPEL repo is
released and correct
On 7/26/07, Centos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any idea why my server crashes when I am creating a 200 G tar file?
I am using tar -zcvf and the original file is about 250 G
Probably because you're attempting to compress it at the same time.
That's amazingly resource intensive, and it's probably
On 7/24/07, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Cantara wrote:
So basically, what I can figure from all of the evidence at this point
is the problem is either:
default configuration of the network in CentOS isn't proper for what
I'm doing (can't handle the traffic or number of
On 7/26/07, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yum install kernel-PAE
reboot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux ubercore1 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5PAE #1 SMP Tue Jul 10 07:50:36 EDT 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers
beast wrote:
On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote:
If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local
repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone
has
real experiences on upgrading OS?
You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if
any idea why my server crashes when I am creating a 200 G tar file?
I am using tar -zcvf and the original file is about 250 G
Centos wrote:
ok, the file system is ext and block size is the default which is 4096,
so I should be able to have 16 Tera Byte filesystem and 2 Tera Byte
files size.
This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd
party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step
by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing
that Priorities is the recommended plugin, so I will change to that,
from
On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote:
If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local
repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has
real experiences on upgrading OS?
You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if you want to go
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mark Rose wrote:
I took a stab at making a bootable CentOS 5 Live USB pendrive and I
ended up with a kernel panic. I was able to do this with a live CD of
CentOS 4, but it seems the same procedure does not work for the
On 26/07/07, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not many support dvd-ram, however, which was buried in his list.
otherwise, I'd say any $34.95 LiteOn or LG drive could do all the rest
of that without a hitch, SATA or PATA.
LG ones usually do DVD-RAM. It's one of their sales slogan.
--
Camron W. Fox wrote:
DVD hyper multidrive, capable of reading and writing DVD-R, DVD-RW,
DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, DVD-R for DL, and DVD+R DL.
I've used an Optiarc to burn all that in Linux, some with cdrecord some
with NeroLinux. Optiarc is a joint NEC/Sony company. DVD drives/burners
are
John R Pierce wrote:
but thats neither here nor there, PAE is a universal issue for any x86
32bit system with 4GB+ ram, with PAE disabled, the BIOS, PCI, AGP or
PCI-express, etc IO spaces consume anywheres from .5 to 1GB of the 32bit
address space. PAE is a hardware workaround implemented
Nick wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
The thing is, and I'm still trying to find a solution for one of our
servers, the the memory addresses from 4Gb down are used for PCI, VGA,
onboard stuff, and even though the memory isn't used, the addresses
are, and so they are not passed to the OS.
Can
Hello,
I'm running centos5. There's some rpms that exist on fedora that are not
in centos5 in it's repos. I was wondering if it was possible to set up yum
to get only selected packages in source rpm form ou of a fedora repo and
install them on centos? In that way they could be recompiled
Tony Barratt wrote:
Hello!
Need to install the required rpmz to support 32bit apps on 64bit Centos 4.
How to find out which rpmz are needed?
Probably the easiest way is to first make sure you have a .rpmmacros
file (in at least root's home directory, also any users that you
routinely use to
Information about the epel repository should be added
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
But since it is an immutable page someone with more privileges
than I will have to do it.
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a
Hi, I have a server linux whith a system storage
DS300. The server run ok, transfer file no problem.
My problem is than when i restart the DS300 this begin
to syncronizing again, but the data not is lost. I can
work whith the DS300 while this is syncronizing.
Is this normal?.
Thanks
beast spake the following on 7/26/2007 2:39 AM:
On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote:
CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and
possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications
current.
I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts = 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by
package httpd
Show us the output of yum -d 5 update, please.
[...]
Dep Number: 1/1
httpd requires: initscripts =
On 7/26/07, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's
shows up as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 29008
Hi,
Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's
shows up as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 290082382360
-/+ buffers/cache: 138300
On 7/26/07, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd
party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step
by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing
that Priorities is the
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, beast wrote:
On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote:
If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local
repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has
real experiences on upgrading OS?
You really want apt and deb
centos a écrit :
Thank you Ugo,
But I was asking about Cricket and not Cacti.
please let me know if you have installed Cricket as well.
Just here : http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/cricket/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 06:25 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:36 +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite
slow. It has only 128 MB RAM. So I upgraded it to 512 MB RAM. Now, It
is running with 512 MB
Lanny Marcus spake the following on 7/26/2007 3:13 PM:
Is there an RPM for this? I think it's in the kdeedu package on the FC6
DVD. My wife is an amateur astronomer and she uses this excellent
program. If upstream isn't including it, can I get it and not break my
CentOS 4.4 system? (Also, I'd
Martin Marques wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
but thats neither here nor there, PAE is a universal issue for any
x86 32bit system with 4GB+ ram, with PAE disabled, the BIOS, PCI, AGP
or PCI-express, etc IO spaces consume anywheres from .5 to 1GB of the
32bit address space. PAE is a hardware
Martin Marques wrote:
Nick wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
The thing is, and I'm still trying to find a solution for one of our
servers, the the memory addresses from 4Gb down are used for PCI,
VGA, onboard stuff, and even though the memory isn't used, the
addresses are, and so they are not
drew einhorn wrote:
Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the
same thing.
Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the plus
repo it needs to be the same priority as base and updates.
That could be a
drew einhorn wrote:
Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions,
and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing
things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not
exist, some exist but are empty, etc.
Depending on whether I am in
Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ...
That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them.
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, drew einhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's how I set up my repository priorities,
I have a SMB printer on my network (HP1120C connected to a Windows XP
machine). CUPS test page printed OK (CUPS v1.1.x) so printer appears to
be installed and set up correctly for printing from my CentOS 5 machine.
Problem is when I try to print multi-page emails, I get an unspecified
error after
beast wrote:
It seems not. Updates directory in Centos 3 still contains OOv1.1.2 only.
So, what is the meaning of supported for 5 years? is it only for bug and
security fixes, not features or enhancements?
Correct. And it is 7 years. Also there are some slight feature
enhancements during the
Steven Haigh writes:
Quoting ajulvestad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Johnny Hughes writes:
ajulvestad wrote:
Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid,
both with three disks.
Setup:
md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1
md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3
*snip*
Thank you for the URL,
Johnny Hughes writes:
ajulvestad wrote:
Ok, this is the case:
I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks.
Setup:
md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1
md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3
Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a
reboot where it attempted
Ok, this is the case:
I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks.
Setup:
md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1
md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3
Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot
where it attempted to fix the raid, but it didn't exactly
Hi Nick,
- Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's
shows up as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0
Hi,
The board has to support it. It has to be able to map the underlying memory to
a higher address space, and the bios has to notify the OS where this is. Are
you using a desktop board as opposed to a server board?
Anyone trying for 3gb ram on an Asus p5b-vm should try their new bios
901
.
On 7/26/07, Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a SMB printer on my network (HP1120C connected to a Windows XP
machine). CUPS test page printed OK (CUPS v1.1.x) so printer appears to
be installed and set up correctly for printing from my CentOS 5 machine.
Problem is when I try to print
On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote:
CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and
possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications
current.
I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is
3.1.1,
today OO in Centos5 is 2.0.4, will it get
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:35:58PM -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Brett Schroeder wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH
and when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big
Chris wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:27:10 +0200
Peter Kjellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Dave K wrote:
On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would
prevent it from being a fine desktop.
I was feeling a bit un-appreciated as a Developer and I thought of all
the other developers of Open Source (Free) Software who relentlessly
contribute to/make Open Source (free) software.
I just wanted to take some time to officially say *Thank You* for all
the good things which you guys/gals
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 08:45 -0700, mario salcedo wrote:
Hi, I have a server linux whith a system storage
DS300. The server run ok, transfer file no problem.
My problem is than when i restart the DS300 this begin
to syncronizing again, but the data not is lost. I can
work whith the DS300
75 matches
Mail list logo
