Chris * wrote:
I had submitted a document to this list a few weeks back that gave
instructions for whole disk encryption which would cover /tmp /home
/swap and everything other than /boot. I did not ask for space in the
wiki because i thought it was waiting for peer review for accuracy.
Max Hetrick wrote:
To further explain things, MoinMoin starts off headers with = Title 1 =
and here's the problem with the html2wiki converter, it actually doesn't
convert the h1 correctly with how I would logically think it should work.
I contacted the Perl developer of
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:41:12PM -0400, Chris * wrote:
I had submitted a document to this list a few weeks back that gave
...
nice write-up, minor typo/corrections in the text added below.
Cheers,
Tru
Summary
...
Step One: Prepare the disk
The first step is to prepare the disk. The
Another post asked if I have a wiki account. The answer is no. I think that
at this point it would be better if i did for this article.
In response to some of the points by Tru:
to be verified: you need to make a GUI install, the text mode installation
method does not have the lvm creation
Craig White scribbled on Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:24 PM:
If you are going to go to multiple lists, might I suggest that you have
1 system-admins list and 1 general-users list and you can tightly
control the system-admins list.
I think you're on to something here. I assume you mean the
Trying to figure out how to make it work. Seems as though it should be
pretty easy.
installed package (from yum search)
avahi-compat-libdns_sd.i386 : Libraries for Apple Bonjour mDNSResponder
compatibility.
/etc/nsswitch.conf altered line so it reads,
hosts: files dns mdns mdns4
started
This is my second request for help with this problem. I have followed
the suggestions given the first time and made some progress but I still
have one final problem/question.
I have two CGI scripts that don't work. One is the standard Set-Cookie,
examples can be found all over the net, that
I have not found a definitive answer
to this question on the CentOS site yet.
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
operating system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the
underlying
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Given the popularity of this thread, I suggest creating a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list, where folks can discuss
list-related stuff.
Popular huh? Let as see some stats on the
posts by user
* Karanbir Singh (15)
* Spike Turner (10)
* Spiro Harvey (8)
* Kenneth Price (5)
* Frank
Hi folks,
I have lots of messages like these appearing on my local CentOS 5.2
consoles:
Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed.
Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address
as source address
I have disabled console logging in syslog.conf,
On 2008-10-17 11:30, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only argument list too long as feedback.
Is there
Mark Maskery a écrit :
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in which,
in general, the customer does not have direct access to the operating
system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the underlying
operating system and if so what licence considerations
Spike Turner wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Out of curiosity which major linux distro operates
a fragmented mailing list such as the one proposed?
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
http://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
Are you sure you are comparing apples to apples? There is nothing
particularly Centos specific
tech wrote:
If I run either of these scripts from a browser using www.domain.com it
fails. If I run it from a browser using
www.domain.com/cgi-bin/install.cgi or
www.domain.com/cgi-bin/techtest.cgi it works.
Yes. Look at ScriptAlias in the config. And at the SELinux contexts in
that
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Lawrence Guirre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 12:55):
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only argument list too long as feedback.
Is there a way to go round this problem?
I have
Lawrence Guirre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 12:55):
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi *
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Lawrence Guirre ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 12:55):
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only argument list too long as feedback.
Is
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Fedora I used to use djvulibre package for djvu files,
but I cannot seem to find this in any CentOS repositores out
there. Google also does not help, nor searching list
archives. :-(
I have found the .rpm file for RHEL 4, but when I tried to
install it (hoping
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Spike Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
the userbase and is not good for the community.
Spike.
Once again you are referring to the CentOS forum. Are you
Hi
Do you know whether snmpwalk can work in v3?
if not, how can I get the snmp v3 info
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Greetings to everyone!
On Fedora I used to use djvulibre package for djvu files, but I cannot seem to
find this in any CentOS repositores out there. Google also does not help, nor
searching list archives. :-(
I have found the .rpm file for RHEL 4, but when I tried to install it (hoping
that
adrian kok wrote:
Do you know whether snmpwalk can work in v3?
if not, how can I get the snmp v3 info
Yes.
# snmpwalk --help
Look at the following switches then.
-a PROTOCOL
-l LEVEL
-u USER
-x PROTOCOL
-X PASSPHRASE
Regards,
Max
___
CentOS
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Spike Turner wrote:
Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
the userbase and is not good for the community.
Spike.
Once again you are referring to the CentOS forum. Are you
saying that
the forums
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, Spike Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
You cannot get an rpm for CentOS 4 and hope it will
just work
on CentOS 5. What repositories have you got configured as
djvulibre-3.5.17-1.el4.rf is for el4?
I didn't get this rpm using yum, but by manually
Mark Maskery wrote:
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in which,
in general, the customer does not have direct access to the operating
system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the underlying
operating system and if so what licence considerations are
Spike Turner wrote on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:28:17 -0700 (PDT):
Popular huh?
You didn't get the subtile irony?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
The two subnets are not physically connected but a Client should be
able to connect to Subnet A or to Subnet B as well.
JohnStanley Writes:
This is what is confusing. If there *NOT* Physically Connected you will
never CONNECT to them. Hope you can calculate SNs ans SNMs. You can add as
many
Jeremy Sanders wrote:
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
This limitation has been removed from more recent kernels.
Yes, you are right - my example was misleading.
Thanks for the very easy solution (cd into directory). Have to try it the
next time.
- Jussi
Paul Bijnens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 13:18):
I believe you gave a bad example!
In the command
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
the
Karanbir Singh wrote:
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
operating system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the
underlying operating system and if so what licence considerations
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
So yum does not help here, or I need another repository
which has djvulibre package for CentOS 5.2, or some other
way to be able to view djvu files. Please give some advise
on this.
A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
shows an rpm in testing
Thank you for your input Les.
Mark
Original Message
From: Les Mikesell
Sent: 17/10/2008 14:02:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
operating
Thanks for your response Karanbir.
I will be putting this through our legal team.
Mark
Original Message
From: Karanbir Singh
Sent: 17/10/2008 13:30:
Mark Maskery wrote:
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in which,
in general, the customer
Spike Turner wrote on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT):
- some may not view the centos forum as fragmented
but is the participation at the same level as the
unfragmented mailing list?
Couldn't it be that some people simply prefer email over HTML forums?
Especially those that have less
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:32, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Here is Subnet number 2.
subnet 192.168.0.16 netmask 255.255.255.224 { # Subnet for 29 computers
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
And next time you ask something please include *error* messages.
Ralph,
Sorry. I should have said that there is nothing in the error log. I have
entries in the access log but not the error log. I had one before but
I did a complete format and re-install and it is
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 12:13 +0200, Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
Hi folks,
I have lots of messages like these appearing on my local CentOS 5.2
consoles:
Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed.
Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address
as
I am trying to increment a filename in a script example name is 01.txt
and I need to keep the leading 0's. I have no problem if the name was
1.txt, 2.txt etc...
var=`expr $var + 1`
however how do I keep the leading 0's?
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:52:15AM -0400, Jerry Geis enlightened us:
I am trying to increment a filename in a script example name is 01.txt
and I need to keep the leading 0's. I have no problem if the name was
1.txt, 2.txt etc...
var=`expr $var + 1`
however how do I keep the leading
Tech wrote on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:34:02 +0800:
I did go back and verify one thing, when the IT guy was testing and it
worked for him, he was using www.domain.com/cgi-bin/install.cgi and not
just www.domain.com. That also failed for him.
Of course, it does. If you have a URL
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:52:15AM -0400, Jerry Geis enlightened us:
/ I am trying to increment a filename in a script example name is 01.txt
// and I need to keep the leading 0's. I have no problem if the name was
// 1.txt, 2.txt etc...
// var=`expr $var + 1`
//
// however how do I keep
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, Spike Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
shows an rpm in testing djvulibre-3.5.19-4.el5.kb.i386.rpm
but you can have a glance at the repoview.
Aha! Ok, I was not aware of the kbs repo. I see the djvulibre in testing, so
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Spike Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Spike Turner wrote:
Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
the userbase and is not good for the community.
Spike.
Once again
We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to
have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they
were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are
in use 24x7, we do not have the luxury of simply doing a clean build,
taking md5sums of each
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:37, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On subnet 192.168.0.16 with a mask of 255.255.255.224 will give enuff ips
for 29 clients. One for the broadcast addy.
I think you are mistaken here, with netmask 255.255.255.224 you can
have network 192.168.0.0 (from 0 to 31) and
John wrote:
# Here is Subnet number 2. subnet 192.168.0.16 netmask
255.255.255.224 { # Subnet for 29 computers
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
here.
On subnet 192.168.0.16 with a mask of
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Sean Carolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to
have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they
were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are
in use 24x7, we
# Here is Subnet number 2.
subnet 192.168.0.16 netmask 255.255.255.224 { # Subnet for 29 computers
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
here.
Filipe
JohnStanley Writes:
On subnet 192.168.0.16 with a
Akemi Yagi wrote:
I can go on with my response to your personal view, but doing so would
be way off-topic here in this thread. Therefore, I started an open
discussion session in the right place for this topic - not
surprisingly - in the CentOS forum:
How can a forum possibly be the right
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
here.
JohnStanley Writes: Follow Up to Previous Mail!!
Filipe,
To early in the day for all this math. Your right saying x.31 - x.63 for
that particular SN, with
Felipe,
JohnStanley Writes.
Whoops, you Hit Send A little to Soon. Only if you waited.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Sean Carolan wrote:
We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to
have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they
were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are
in use 24x7, we do not have the luxury of simply doing a clean build,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Sanders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This limitation has been removed from more recent kernels.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:18, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To early in the day for all this math.
It really is! :-)
Your right saying x.31 - x.63 for
that particular SN, with x.63 being the broadcast addy and x.31 the network
addy.
Actually, x.32 to x.63, with x.32 being the network
Hi all
I want to reuse command in the shell historys
Which command I can only select traceroute 192.168.0.5 to run?
$ history |grep traceroute
26 traceroute 192.168.0.5
27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5
28 traceroute 192.168.0.10
29 traceroute yahoo.com
46 traceroute
Yeah, but you cannot really subnet that way:
JohnStanley Writes:
So let me understand that your saying that if I am Allocated and Own the IP
blocks 64.x.x.33 - 64.x.x.35 that I can not Subnet them Out in any way? I
have always done that between for inbetween LAN to WAN Back to LAN or VPN.
ann kok wrote:
Hi all
I want to reuse command in the shell historys
Which command I can only select traceroute 192.168.0.5 to run?
$ history |grep traceroute
26 traceroute 192.168.0.5
27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5
28 traceroute 192.168.0.10
29 traceroute yahoo.com
46
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
My personal opinion, if you're using RFC1918 addresses for internal
networks, you should only use 255.255.255.0 netmasks everywhere, even
though it's a network for one machine only. Dealing with netmasks is a
PITA, and should be avoided unless there's a real reason to
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, ann kok wrote:
Which command I can only select traceroute 192.168.0.5 to run?
$ history |grep traceroute
26 traceroute 192.168.0.5
27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5
28 traceroute 192.168.0.10
29 traceroute yahoo.com
46 traceroute 192.168.0.33
csh history
!26
on 10-16-2008 7:57 PM R P Herrold spake the following:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
I'd have to suggest that the 'default' list (eg this one) should be
the most general and beginner oriented, and any new additional lists
should be the ones with the narrower focus (centos-tech,
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 14:02, ann kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to reuse command in the shell historys
Which command I can only select traceroute 192.168.0.5 to run?
I would type Ctrl-R (interactive search history starting with more
recent events), then type trace, then type Ctrl-R
snip
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=16821forum=18
So, people who are interested, please join in and post your comments
and thoughts.
Thanks,
Akemi
(toracat, CentOS forum MODERATOR)
This thread has got to have beaten the CentOS record for most
My personal opinion, if you're using RFC1918 addresses for internal
networks, you should only use 255.255.255.0 netmasks everywhere, even
though it's a network for one machine only. Dealing with netmasks is a
PITA, and should be avoided unless there's a real reason to use it,
for instance with
on 10-16-2008 5:15 PM Clint Dilks spake the following:
I get a 404 on the url in the OP's post, but if someone has a url to
the driver disk in question, I can try and look at what the issue
might be
Hi
http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_103_13121.shtm
Or go to
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
This thread has got to have beaten the CentOS record for
most posts about nothing!
Or the longest off-topic thread about off-topic threads!
or a sad demonstation by people who know better ignoring
Godwin's Law
If people are unwilling to follow long
on 10-17-2008 2:30 AM Jussi Hirvi spake the following:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only argument list too long as
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 15:51, Marcus Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is definitely not what I am trying to do. I try to line out the
setup again:
Subnet A (192.168.2.x) - DHCP Server with 2 NICs - Subnet B (10.1.0.0)
Clients on Subnet A should get a static IP from the host
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS] CGI configuration - second post
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Friday, October 17, 2008, 1:12 AM
This is my second request for help with this problem. I have
followed
the suggestions given
John wrote:
Yeah, but you cannot really subnet that way:
JohnStanley Writes:
So let me understand that your saying that if I am Allocated and Own the IP
blocks 64.x.x.33 - 64.x.x.35 that I can not Subnet them Out in any way?
Yes, because that up there contains exactly *one* IP address
See man dhcpd for the details, but I think it would be something like:
# dhcpd -cf /etc/dhcpd-subnetA.conf -lf
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd-subnetA.leases -pf /var/run/dhcpd-subnetA.pid eth0
# dhcpd -cf /etc/dhcpd-subnetB.conf -lf
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd-subnetB.leases -pf /var/run/dhcpd-subnetB.pid Eth1
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with
the CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware
compatibility (especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a
purchase decision, and reckon that seeing what's included with the
installer would be the
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only argument list too long as feedback.
Is there a way to go round this problem?
I have CentOS 5.2.
It isn't a problem with the commands, it is a problem of how
long a command
line can be when piped to a command.
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp is
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Ian Levesque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility
(especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a purchase decision, and
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Ian Levesque
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included
with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility
(especially ethernet
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Ian Levesque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility
(especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a
Yes, because that up there contains exactly *one* IP address - so I'd
hardly
call that blocks.
Where I'm from we call it Blocks or Ipaddy. :-)
I have no idea what you are trying to tell me - you cannot subnet out one
IP address to your PIX firewall.
I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 16:32, Ian Levesque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer.
From what I see, the kernel in /isolinux/vmlinuz on the CentOS 5.2
x86_64 installer CD (which I'm pretty certain is the
John wrote:
I have no idea what you are trying to tell me - you cannot subnet out one
IP address to your PIX firewall.
I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have been doing it over 10 years. One
often misguided approach to setting them up is, facing it directly into the
open internet. Your
I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have been doing it over 10 years.
One
often misguided approach to setting them up is, facing it directly into
the
open internet. Your as good as gone when someone hits up the ftp port on
that shiny new PIX and tunnels right in.
I never heard anyone
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 16:32, Ian Levesque
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included
with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer.
From what I see, the kernel in /isolinux/vmlinuz on the
on 10-17-2008 9:13 AM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, Spike Turner spiketurner09-/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
shows an rpm in testing djvulibre-3.5.19-4.el5.kb.i386.rpm
but you can have a glance at the repoview.
on 10-17-2008 3:25 PM John spake the following:
I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have been doing it over 10 years.
One
often misguided approach to setting them up is, facing it directly into
the
open internet. Your as good as gone when someone hits up the ftp port on
that shiny new PIX
Satchel Paige - Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories
Scott Silva (Mail Scanner) Wrote:
TCP/IP works the same way no matter what country you are from. The terms
are
the same, and if someone uses the wrong term, it is not the language
difference, that person just learned the wrong term.
Yes, works the same in all Countries. Layers 1,2,3 of the OSI
trying to install octave from epel onto centos 5.2, and getting
dependency errors. only place I could find this RPM was in epel, which
I 'thought' ran on native rhel5/centos5 without requiring any other
repos, but I guess I'm wrong?!?
google tells me libhdf5 is some sot of 'heirarchial data
thad wrote:
Satchel Paige - Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10-16-2008 7:57 PM R P Herrold spake the following:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
Godwin's law declared on the thread
-- Russ herrold
That's one I hadn't heard in a long time! ;-P
Oh, my lord, that
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Mark Maskery a écrit :
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
operating system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the
Les Mikesell wrote:
thad wrote:
it should be:
for i in `ls /var/amavis/tmp`
do
rm $i
done
These shouldn't make any difference. The limit is on the size of the
expanded shell command line.
Really?
$ M=0; N=0; for W in `find /usr -xdev 2/dev/null`; do M=$(($M+1));
N=$(($N+${#W}+1));
Error: Missing Dependency: libhdf5.so.0 is needed by package octave
JohnStanley Writes:
yum whatprovides libhdf5.so.0
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: ftp.linux.ncsu.edu
* updates: styx.biochem.wfubmc.edu
* addons: mirror.atlantic.net
* extras:
Robert Nichols wrote:
These shouldn't make any difference. The limit is on the size of the
expanded shell command line.
Really?
$ M=0; N=0; for W in `find /usr -xdev 2/dev/null`; do M=$(($M+1));
N=$(($N+${#W}+1)); done; echo $M $N
156304 7677373
vs.
$ /bin/echo `find /usr -xdev
96 matches
Mail list logo
