CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory CEEA-DRBD:2010-01
Upstream details at :
http://git.drbd.org/?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=blob;f=ChangeLog;hb=HEAD
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a0e5a05a562b28d2a0ed12d6c8b07194
I am experimenting with a kvm virtual machine. At the moment I
trying to configure iptables for the the host instance. In Xen
terms I would call this Dom0 but I do not know the appropriate KVM
term, if any.
The setup I have is a single NIC (eth0) host bridged (bridge0). I
want iptables to
Hi,
I'm geting this message from virt-manager.
Server: SuperMicro X8SIL with INTEL X3440
Here is my logs
/var/log/dmesg:
Bootdata ok (command line is ro root=/dev/md2)
Linux version 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen (mockbu...@builder10.centos.org)
(gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) #1 SMP
According to the manual for your motherboard supports it:
Intel Virtualization Technology (Available when supported by the CPU)
And according to Intel the cpu supports it. Make sure it's enabled in the
bios.
And it's my own opinion that there's no need email all your logs to the
world unless
Ok,
sory about the long post
Something specific:
[2010-06-22 06:05:02 xend.XendDomainInfo 3166] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:263) No
vm path in store for existing domain 0
[2010-06-22 06:05:02 xend 3166] DEBUG (XendDomain:164) number of vcpus to use
is 0
El 22/06/2010 11:44 a.m., compdoc
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Armando Montiel Caba wrote:
Ok,
sory about the long post
Something specific:
[2010-06-22 06:05:02 xend.XendDomainInfo 3166] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:263)
No vm path in store for existing domain 0
[2010-06-22 06:05:02 xend 3166] DEBUG (XendDomain:164) number of vcpus
Hola a todos, quisiera saber como puedo realizar redundancia de ISP, si es que
un ISP se cae el otro entre a funcionar automaticamente.
Gracias
_
Explore the seven wonders of
Edwin Guajala escribió:
Hola a todos, quisiera saber como puedo realizar redundancia de ISP, si es
que un ISP se cae el otro entre a funcionar automaticamente.
Gracias
Lo que tu quieres tener es un enlace redundante, cosa que en el caso que se te
caiga uno te queda funcionando el otro.
Creo que ese servicio lo da Telmex o si lo quieres hacer tu, hazlo con router
cisco . Busca info sobre el protocolo BGP
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Guajala
Eric,
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 you wrote:
I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
[...]
Would this error indicate a motherboard or CPU problem? How can I
diagnose? or is there something
Hi! Eric
(2010/06/22 13:11), Eric Deis wrote:
Transaction: Address/Command error
Its mother board (memory controller) problem.
Its *not* DIMM problem.(memtest can't detect this error.)
your data transfer(read/write) sometimes met bit errors.
This is Nehalem cpu's error detecting feature.(MCE)
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Eric Deis wrote:
I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
I'm guessing the old kernel just didn't notice.
The below MCEs indicate bad hardware. Since the DIMMs are a lot
On 06/22/10 12:21 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Eric Deis wrote:
I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
I'm guessing the old kernel just didn't notice.
The
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
On 06/22/10 12:21 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Eric Deis wrote:
I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
I'm guessing
Tim Nelson writes:
Greetings all-
I have a CentOS 5 (Final) system that is serving up content to several other
hosts via NFS. The amount of data transferred is rather small as most of the
files are under 100kb and each export has maybe 100 files that are accessed
regularly. I'm finding that
From: Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net
The MiscFixed fonts don't seem to be available in
GNOME Terminal anymore.
I can find misc-fixed in gnome terminal and xfontsel...
I have these packages...
bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.1.1
bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-7
chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.1
dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.10-1
Wordpress should:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/simple-ldap-login/
I have already tested this Wordpress plugin a few months ago (on
CentOS 5.4 x86_64 with EPEL's Wordpress).
I needed to fiddle a bit with the UI, but quickly got an LDAP
integration working.
As whether it is 100% secure,
Florin Andrei wrote on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:42:46 -0700:
No, that's fine, really. I was just pointing out that, for some
Internet-facing systems, this policy may be inadequate, due to the
fast-changing nature of the Internet.
I disagree. The included Postfix works just fine. You have a very
On 22/06/2010 09:52, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
So, this is CentOS 5.0 or 5.1. You should upgrade to at least CentOS 5.2. The
5.2 kernel fixes serious performance problems with NFS.
I agree, getting to the latest distro packages is a good idea. There
were some nfs issues in 5.2
On 22/06/2010 11:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:42:46 -0700:
No, that's fine, really. I was just pointing out that, for some
Internet-facing systems, this policy may be inadequate, due to the
fast-changing nature of the Internet.
I disagree. The
On 22/06/2010 00:52, Phil Manuel wrote:
Has anyone looked at using icinga ? I know it replaces the front end of
nagios, and uses the same (slightly modified ?) backend, using the same
plugins.
Icinga is an interesting project, and there is work going on under the
hood to make it a more
On 21/06/2010 18:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
I didn't know about that, but the first googled hit says you are
supposed to be able to write reusable tests in a human-readable language
which sounds way too unrealistic to ever work. And I want a tool that
understands network equipment natively,
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and find
internationalized add ons or alternatives for our new Asian customers
(Japan,
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
This seems like duplication of effort with the CentOS people, since they
already package DRBD for CentOS 5.x (and it works very well).
No its not,
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:23 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and find
internationalized add ons
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:03 AM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
This seems like duplication of effort with the CentOS people, since they
already
On 10-06-22 09:19 AM, JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:23 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and
On Jun 21, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/19/2010 08:58 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
agree. Karanbir, you used to say that community is about those people
who help the community and not about those who use the community. ihmo
Dag is one
[..]
/proc/mounts shows rsize has been negotiated to 1mB
Have you tested the same thing with a Linux NFS server?
The CentOS 5.x kernel has a maximum server [rw]size of 32Kb, so you
would need to use something with a more recent kernel to get [rw]sizes
to be 1Mb.
Haven't tried with a
On Jun 21, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Alex Still alex.rans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
[...]
Well, it's been a long time since I've done troubleshooting on large NFS
networks, but here's an idea...
Are you seeing any kind of
El lun, 21-06-2010 a las 19:57 -0400, Rick Thomas escribió:
I have a machine with two net interfaces.
it seems to always pick the wrong one (eth1) as the default route.
I can change it with
route del default
route add default eth0
after it's up (or in rc.local, of
On 05/25/2010 08:08 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from
using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages,
mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The
Samba server services Linux, WinXP, and
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:24 -0400, Digimer wrote:
On 10-06-22 09:19 AM, JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:23 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
Hi All:
I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-194.el5 is needed by kvm-83-164.9.x86_64
I have already run yum-builddep srpm and here is the
Hi,
I need to export NFS shares to all clients in a subnetwork, except
that one client will have different NFS options. I am not sure how to
write subnest mask for this in exports file. For all clients it was
easy as all I had to do was 10.0.0.0/16 or 10.0.0.0/255.255.0.0. How
do I modify
On 6/22/2010 6:06 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 21/06/2010 18:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
I didn't know about that, but the first googled hit says you are
supposed to be able to write reusable tests in a human-readable language
which sounds way too unrealistic to ever work. And I want a tool that
[...]
On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
definitly something fishy going on. This has been reported on over 20
machines, so I don't think it's faulty hardware we're seeing.
Any thoughts,
On 6/21/2010 11:27 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Has anyone looked at using icinga ?
The forums are nearly dead, doesn't look like much of the Nagios
folk jumped ship yet. Archives show next to no activity.
Frankly, if I am migrating away from Nagios, I would likely be compelled
to put any
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, Alex Still wrote:
Clients are blade servers. The blade chassis have integrated cisco
switches, which are plugged to a cisco 6509. The NFS server is on
another site 40km away, directly connected to another 6509. These
datacenters are linked via DWDM.
Carlos S wrote:
Hi,
I need to export NFS shares to all clients in a subnetwork, except
that one client will have different NFS options. I am not sure how to
write subnest mask for this in exports file. For all clients it was
easy as all I had to do was 10.0.0.0/16 or 10.0.0.0/255.255.0.0.
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
able to support XFS on your CentOS machine? Just seems a little odd
given how
On 06/22/2010 08:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
able to support XFS on your
On 06/22/2010 04:57 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
able to support XFS on your
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com wrote:
Hi All:
I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-194.el5 is
Thanks James.
So does exports list has any priority for loading config. e.g. I have
general rule as 10.0.0.0/16 for read-only and then 10.0.0.20 as
read-write. Then 10.0.0.20 overrides (default) 10.0.0.0/16 options?
--
CS.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, James Pearson
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
able to support XFS on your CentOS machine? Just seems a little odd
given how much
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, aurfalien aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/22/2010 08:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications
Digimer sent a missive on 2010-06-22:
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and find
internationalized add ons or alternatives
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
why does RHEL not support XFS straight out of the box?
i suspect you would be more likely to receive a meaningful answer from one of
these sources:
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 01:48:42PM -0400, Steve Huff wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
why does RHEL not support XFS straight out of the box?
i suspect you would be more likely to receive a meaningful answer
from one of these sources:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On 6/21/10, Jane Curry jane.cu...@skills-1st.co.uk wrote:
If you want further help, please ask!
Havwe you tried Zabbix, the NextGen NMS?
+1 to Zabbix
LAMP software, agent for all
Thanks! to all who replied.
I solved it by putting identical GATEWAY= clauses in each of
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth1
This works without error, even though the gateway IP address in
question is not accessible from
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Alex Still alex.rans...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
definitly something fishy going on. This has been reported on over 20
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com wrote:
Hi All:
I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
error: Failed build
On 6/22/2010 1:51 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Thanks! to all who replied.
I solved it by putting identical GATEWAY= clauses in each of
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth1
This works without error, even though the gateway IP
-Original Message-
From: Digimer
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:24
Subject: [CentOS] OT: Recommendation for a good Internationalized
terminalsoftware
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS.
Until now, most of our customer's end-users have accessed
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield cen...@dm.cobite.com
wrote:
Hi All:
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-x86_64 =
So I tried moving the GATEWAY clause into etc/sysconfig/network and
out of the individual ifcfg-eth? files. It works.
So I guess that's the preferred solution, because it puts the
information in a single place. There's no need to make sure two or
more places are synchronized if anything
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On 06/22/2010 04:57 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications after the install
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default
It does, try modinfo xfs or yum list xfsprogs.
but rather
requires custom modifications after the install in
It's not available in the installer since it's considered a technology
preview by Redhat.
... which causes no problem whatsoever. It is normally used for data
partitions, not system partitions.
One can install the OS and then create the necessary partitions with XFS.
Carlos S wrote:
Thanks James.
So does exports list has any priority for loading config. e.g. I have
general rule as 10.0.0.0/16 for read-only and then 10.0.0.20 as
read-write. Then 10.0.0.20 overrides (default) 10.0.0.0/16 options?
I don't believe the order is important - however, I suggest
Thanks Guys!
Your advice helped me fix the problem.
Yes, it was the motherboard that was the issue. I update the firmware
and must have had some microcode fixes to support my CPU (John mentioned
the memory controller is in the CPU for Xeon 5500).
Now upon reboot using 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 no
Just finished downloading the DVD with bittorrent. Ended up with two iso
files (1 of 2 and 2 of 2). sha1sum checks out on both.
This is the first time I've encountered two DVDs. Will the install
politely ask for DVD #2 when it is time?
___
CentOS
DVD2 only contains OpenOffice packages. Unless you need to install these from
the DVD, you should be fine without DVD 2.
Josh
From: centos-boun...@centos.org on behalf of David McGuffey
Sent: Tue 6/22/2010 9:46 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] 2
65 matches
Mail list logo
