Although CentOS 3 EOL was announced by Tru on Nov 3, 2010 it is still
listed on the home page with no indication of the EOL status. This has
been the source of some confusion already.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Estimados amigos de CentOS
tengo el LiveCD de CentOS 5.5, cuando arranco en una maquina que tiene winxp no
puedo acceder ni montar el HD.
Utilizo este sistema para eliminar virus en memory's y HD con otros linux me
funciona pero con CenOS no lo logro.
Basicamente necesito indicaciones de como
Puedes usar como alternativa Varnish
Sls
El 7 de diciembre de 2010 10:01, Julio Cesar jce...@geotech.cu escribió:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:20:19 -0500, Luis García Rey
r...@ecie.minbas.cu wrote:
Hola amigos de la lista, me gusta seguir el hilo de esta lista ya que
siempre nos aporta algo
2010/12/8 Carlos Mÿe9ndez tocarli...@yahoo.com.mx:
Estimados amigos de CentOS
tengo el LiveCD de CentOS 5.5, cuando arranco en una maquina que tiene winxp
no puedo acceder ni montar el HD.
Utilizo este sistema para eliminar virus en memory's y HD con otros linux me
funciona pero con
2010/12/8 wilmer caiza wilmerfernand...@gmail.com:
Buenas tardes, tengo un error al reiniciar el servicio named. El servicio no
se puede detener ni reiniciar me de el error de Fallo, a lo que utilizo
service named status me el siguiente mensaje named -sdb interrumpido pero
existe un archivo
I made a diskless node centos.
the pxelinux.cfg/default file :
default centos
label centos
kernel vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.el5
append initrd=initrd-2.6.18-194.el5.nfs.img
nfsroot=10.10.10.1:/srv/centos
ip=dhcp rw
I can successfull*y boot-strap the system with no error.*
*But when i
On 08/12/10 04:15, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 9:02 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
Well in fact I don't think that will even work with the present URL
rules. Just on a lark I clicked on your string, and my firefox
interpreted it as http://3ffe:1900. Unless there's a special http
protocol string
On 08/12/10 03:36, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:20 PM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno
On 29/11/10 13:11, Steve Clark wrote:
I don't know how it is now - but I tried running in permissive mode a
few years ago. It would complain about some
file, I would fix the file and the next thing I knew it was complaining
about the same file again, and the file was part
of the redhat
On 08/12/10 04:28, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 8:28 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
I think you've missed the point that 'all that stuff' (being traditional
unix security mechanisms) are not all that insecure. It is only when you
get them wrong that you need to fall back on selinux as a safety
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[...snip...]
As was already mentioned in another post, run in permissive mode, for a
few days if you must, and go through all the things the software does
and voila! setroubleshoot and/or logs tell
On 30/11/10 17:21, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/30/2010 9:51 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
If a particular app is so recalcitrant that SELinux needs to be turned off,
that's when I'd be doing some drastic things, much like windows lab
environments need done. Things like automatic revert to known-good
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:15:50PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 9:02 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
Well in fact I don't think that will even work with the present URL
rules. Just on a lark I clicked on your string, and my firefox
interpreted it as http://3ffe:1900. Unless there's a
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Agnello George wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com
Subject: [CentOS] display issue after installing centos 5.5 on hp probook
4420s
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
I can only image phonetically calling these off on a support call, I'd
get half way through it and the other end would tell me to forget it
I'll wait until DNS is working again.
You aren't crippled currently when DNS doesn't work?
On 12/06/2010 10:52 AM, adrian kok wrote:
Hi all
I just know there are curl / lwp-request, lynx and elinks
Which command is good for http testing?
What kind of testing? Throughput? Testing the output of scripts? Broken
link detection? You need to define what you mean by 'http testing'.
For
On 12/07/2010 04:31 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
LOL twice, I'll top-post! (I hate M$ Office, but I'm stuck with it)
Really? In blatant disregard for the published guidelines for
use on this and other
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:41:58AM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
Why do we bottom post? People have said so you can read what has been
already written before you reply.
But all the time people snip out big sections. That IMHO defeats the
reason for bottom posting.
Top posting ruins the
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:10 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
The even more horrendous problem, which is so pervasive it affects
everyone, is the insistence on asymmetric connections. Even when
Australia does get this fabled fibre-to-the-home, it still won't be
symmetric. *sigh*
Fibre
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:41:58AM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:31 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
Why do we bottom post? People have said so you can read what has been already
written before you reply.
But all the time people snip out big sections. That IMHO defeats the reason
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[...snip...]
As was already mentioned in another post, run in permissive mode, for a
few days if you must, and go through all the things the software does
On 12/8/10 4:42 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 17:21, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/30/2010 9:51 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
If a particular app is so recalcitrant that SELinux needs to be turned off,
that's when I'd be doing some drastic things, much like windows lab
environments need
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[...snip...]
As was already mentioned in another post, run in permissive mode, for a
few days
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:41:58AM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:31 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
Why do we bottom post? People have said so you can read what has been
already written before you reply.
But all the time people snip out big sections. That IMHO
On 12/8/2010 9:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[...snip...]
As was already mentioned in another
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:43:03AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Scott Robbins wrote:
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php
http://howto-pages.org/posting_style
give good explanations. Trimming is important. Putting a two line
answer at the end of 400 line message isn't
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:37:02 pm Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 03:11 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
The even more horrendous problem, which is so pervasive it affects
everyone, is the insistence on asymmetric connections. Even when
Australia does get this fabled
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:43:03AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Scott Robbins wrote:
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php
http://howto-pages.org/posting_style
give good explanations. Trimming is important. Putting a two line
answer at the end of
I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly.
Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off multipart
html crap.
---
This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 06:29:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
I think you've missed the point that 'all that stuff' (being traditional unix
security mechanisms) are not all that insecure. It is only when you get them
wrong that you need to fall back on selinux as a safety net. And if you
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:16 +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly.
Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off multipart
html crap.
+1
Although I've found @gmail user's consider themselves
-Original Message-
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:21:36 +
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
Alright, pray tell how I, a desktop
I am using an 8G CF card. (I was using dd to duplicate the card with
different size cards I was advised not to).
So I wrote the script below which basically:
1) runs fdisk to setup the device
2) makes the ext3 file system and the swap
3) mounts my old image / filesystem and the new partition
4)
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Nope, ARP is gone. But it gets a replacement as a part of IPv6, instead
of ARP being an addition to IPv4.
http://itkia.com/how-to-arp-a-in-ipv6/
http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_TCPIPIPv6NeighborDiscoveryProtocolND.htm
I have a
On 12/8/2010 9:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 06:29:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
I think you've missed the point that 'all that stuff' (being traditional unix
security mechanisms) are not all that insecure. It is only when you get them
wrong that you need to fall back on
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:37 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Nope, ARP is gone. But it gets a replacement as a part of IPv6, instead
of ARP being an addition to IPv4.
http://itkia.com/how-to-arp-a-in-ipv6/
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and still use aol.
It really is worth noting that the
I agree!!!
On 08/12/2010 16:46, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and still
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:03:26 am Scott Robbins wrote:
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and still use aol.
Lots of corporate people top post to retain the
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:46 -0800, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:28:38 am L A Hurst wrote:
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
Alright, pray tell how I, a desktop Linux user, can, without VM's and
without having to switch users, protect my files from a PDF attack
through Adobe Reader?
Backups.
I looked in vain for a
Le 2010-12-08 07:41, Steve Clark a écrit :
On 12/07/2010 04:31 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
LOL twice, I'll top-post! (I hate M$ Office, but I'm stuck with it)
Really? In blatant disregard for the published
On 12/08/2010 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Don't run software you don't trust. Keep the software you run up to
date. Don't open files you don't trust.
Agree here. We have very few issues at my company, because we stress the
issue of thinking before you click, especially when it comes to
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:16 +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post
properly.
Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off
multipart html crap.
+1
Although I've found @gmail
On 12/8/2010 4:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Disabling SELinux is the same type of decision as disabling the firewall ---
it's there to protect you, yet you don't know how to properly configure it
and
use it, furthermore you don't want to bother to learn, so you simply disable
the thing
Jerry Franz wrote:
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and still use aol.
It really is worth
On 08/12/10 16:03, William Warren wrote:
On 12/8/2010 9:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Lots of corporate people top post to retain the threading,
and get rather upset when you trim the replies below, since
they aren't using MUA's that can thread. Not to mention that
top-posting is the default reply setup for the most commonly
used corporate-type MUA's.
+1. M$ Outlook
Responses inline.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:13
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nerd rage (Was: IPV4 is nearly
depleted, are you ready for
On 12/8/2010 9:46 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and still use aol.
-Original Message-
Responses inline.
Jerry Franz wrote:
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a
mailing list for something else. I hadn't realized how
most people
top
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:39:50 am Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/2010 9:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Alright, pray tell how I, a desktop Linux user, can, without VM's and
without having to switch users, protect my files from a PDF attack through
Adobe Reader?
Don't run software you
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:13:05 am m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Top posting is talking over everyone else.
Yep, you nailed it. It's reply mode=jerry_springer_guest in essence. And it
is the way many non-technical people prefer to communicate. As Sam Goldwyn is
often quoted as saying:
On 12/8/2010 11:02 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:39:50 am Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/2010 9:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Alright, pray tell how I, a desktop Linux user, can, without VM's and
without having to switch users, protect my files from a PDF attack through
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:13:05 am m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
Oh, BTW: vim over emacs.
Actually, yep. I do know how to exit from emacs (the windowing o/s
masquerading as a text editor...).
alt.religion.editors g
What about alt.emacs.die.die.die or
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:17:40 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
But your question was what to do if you choose to ignore the simple and
available tools - things available and well understood on many platforms.
VM = complex. Not to mention proprietary (for all but KVM) and
resource-wasteful.
On 12/8/2010 11:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
But your question was what to do if you choose to ignore the simple and
available tools - things available and well understood on many platforms.
VM = complex. Not to mention proprietary (for all but KVM) and
resource-wasteful.
Switch User =
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 01:02:10 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
Standards committees have their ways of breaking all previous existing
implementations with their final decrees. Let me know when they are
finished.
Standards committees are never finished.
Linux is not standardized, either;
On 12/8/2010 12:19 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Standards committees have their ways of breaking all previous existing
implementations with their final decrees. Let me know when they are
finished.
Standards committees are never finished.
Linux is not standardized, either; in the case of CentOS,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2010 10:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 06:29:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
I think you've missed the point that 'all that stuff' (being traditional
unix
security mechanisms) are not all that insecure. It is only
On 08/12/10 17:10, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/2010 4:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
[...snip...]
Agreed, and something that equally needs standardization.
iptables is a de-facto standard on all Linux distributions nowadays. It
is not ratified by ISO, IETF or similar ... but how does that
I hadn't noticed until just now that the default apache config file
doesn't show a virtual host for https anymore. Does that have any
significance, and do the same old config parameters apply to the new
httpd when I want to set up a secure web site?
Steve Campbell
On December 8, 2010 11:23:55 am Steve Campbell wrote:
I hadn't noticed until just now that the default apache config file
doesn't show a virtual host for https anymore. Does that have any
significance, and do the same old config parameters apply to the new
httpd when I want to set up a secure
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 01:47:07 pm Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Sandbox -X might help solve some of these problems. Available in RHEL6
http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/31146.html?thread=212906
Looks interesting, Dan. Thanks much. And thanks much for the sometimes
thankless work of trying
On 12/8/2010 12:55 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
The real life situation is that iptables only works on linux and the way
it works is distribution-dependent. So what you learn may lock you into
a platform that may not always be your best choice.
Please educate me here. I've been using Novell
Has anyone noticed over the years, that every time a major new CentOS
release is just about to happen, suddenly there starts to be a few very
long and drawn out threads?
Has anyone ever considered that the core team is in fact monitoring this
thread while trying to devote as much time as
On 12/8/2010 7:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Such [periodic failures] are fairly common
I'd say the main reason someone chooses CentOS (or another Linux flavor
with similar policies, like Ubuntu LTS) is that the distro provider has
made a long-term support commitment with minimal churn
[I'm guessing from the dozens of quoted lines per reply that many of
y'all aren't as lucky as I am. I have a threading email reader with
backing store, so I can go back and read past messages in a thread if I
need more context than a brief quote can provide. I have been so lucky
since the
On 12/8/2010 3:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
it is still not recommendable to trade security for simplicity.
Security is never an absolute, is *always* a tradeoff against simplicity.
We could store our servers 16 feet underground and encased in concrete
to prevent tampering and accidental
On 12/8/2010 8:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 06:29:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
And if you can't get the simple version right, how can you hope to
do it right with something wildly more complicated?
Alright, pray tell how I, a desktop Linux user,...
Let's not drag the
On 12/8/2010 3:41 PM, Warren Young wrote:
/That/ is my point. I could -- and sometimes do -- work around file
permissions errors manually, quickly. SELinux has a higher order of
complexity compared to Unix file permissions, so the associated fixes
don't fit into a small,
On 12/8/2010 3:26 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there any central reporting concept in SELinux so a multi-machine
admin doesn't have to go check each for all of the one-off cases and
knowledge can be shared about the fixes needed for 3rd party RPMs?
No. But then, there's not one for file
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, John Hinton wrote:
Has anyone noticed over the years, that every time a major new CentOS
release is just about to happen, suddenly there starts to be a few very
long and drawn out threads?
Really? Interesting.
Has anyone ever considered that the
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:41 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:37 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Nope, ARP is gone. But it gets a replacement as a part of IPv6, instead
of ARP being an addition to IPv4.
On 12/8/2010 4:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/8/2010 3:26 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there any central reporting concept in SELinux so a multi-machine
admin doesn't have to go check each for all of the one-off cases and
knowledge can be shared about the fixes needed for 3rd party RPMs?
No.
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:11:23 pm Warren Young wrote:
Let's not drag the desktop user into this discussion, too.
Why not? Are there no CentOS desktop users out there? Are the needs of the
desktop just to be ignored? I support desktop Linux users who are not power
users; works
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:03 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 12/8/2010 9:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Les
Hi all,
Not having issues setting this in Ubuntu or Windows but I cannot seem
to add a static DNS or search path without it getting over written
when networks restarts.
The file dhclient.conf seems ignored.
I would like to simply have a fixed DNS and search path added to what
ever was
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 05:00 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/8/2010 7:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Such [periodic failures] are fairly common
I'd say the main reason someone chooses CentOS (or another Linux flavor
with similar policies, like Ubuntu LTS) is that the distro provider
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 02:55 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Second, iptables is a de-facto standard for Linux, just as pf is pretty
much the standard firewalling on BSD. Windows and Solaris got their own
firewalling methods as well. My point is, neither of them are any Posix
standards
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
How many of those use the same commands to
start/stop/save-current-config? Where do they keep the configs? How If
you deployed applications on all of them, how much time would it take to
train the operators that do the install and
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:11:23 pm Warren Young wrote:
Let's not drag the desktop user into this discussion, too.
Why not? Are there no CentOS desktop users out there? Are the needs of the
desktop just to be ignored? I
Hi all,
Not having issues setting this in Ubuntu or Windows but I cannot seem
to add a static DNS or search path without it getting over written
when networks restarts.
The file dhclient.conf seems ignored.
I would like to simply have a fixed DNS and search path added to what
ever was
On 12/8/2010 6:14 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Or rather stop telling people not to use SELinux and iptables on this
list just because you don't want to use any of these tools because it is
too troublesome for you and your gang.
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 08:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/8/2010 6:14 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Or rather stop telling people not to use SELinux and iptables on this
list just because you don't want to use any of these
On Dec 8, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
Hi all,
Not having issues setting this in Ubuntu or Windows but I cannot seem
to add a static DNS or search path without it getting over written
when networks restarts.
The file dhclient.conf seems ignored.
I would like to simply have a
On 12/8/2010 5:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 05:00 AM, Warren Young wrote:
I assume you mean to advocate running updates infrequently,
No, I advocate setting up SELinux properly which will take care of the
automatic updates.
That's great if you are wise enough
On 12/8/2010 3:55 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:11:23 pm Warren Young wrote:
Let's not drag the desktop user into this discussion, too.
Why not?
I thought my reason was clear, but apparently not. You talk the talk of
security, but I guess we hang in different
On 12/07/2010 05:11 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I wrote this paper to try to explain what SELinux tends to complain
about.
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/Presentations/selinux_four_things.pdf
I am having difficulty with the pdf file - both adobe and kpdf
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:06 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/8/2010 5:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 05:00 AM, Warren Young wrote:
I assume you mean to advocate running updates infrequently,
No, I advocate setting up SELinux properly which will take care
In the bang head and repeat mode here.
The live usb partition is /dev/sda1
Reboot / power on
It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2
$ umount /mnt/disc/sda2
$ mkdir /root/foo
$ mke2fs /dev/sda2
$ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo
Kernel panic
Snip from the kernel panic:
??
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:38
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: [CentOS] 5.5 x86_64 live cd
In the bang head and repeat mode here.
The live usb partition
92 matches
Mail list logo
